Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-20

Introduzione

Mike McGlone, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, has revised his Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction upward from a previous low of $10,000 to $28,000, citing historical price distribution. However, he maintains a cautious outlook, suggesting the buy-the-dip strategy may be over and noting that traditional assets like stocks, gold, and silver are attracting investors with lower volatility compared to cryptocurrencies. His forecasts have faced criticism from the crypto community, with some labeling them as alarmist and potentially misleading. Despite the revision, broader concerns about Bitcoin's volatility persist, with current prices around $67,471.96 and a high volatility rating. The article emphasizes that this is not financial advice and encourages independent research.

Mike McGlobe, a Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst, has revised his BTC price prediction. While the number is still worrisome, it presents a comparatively better picture than before. Hence, keeping the broader concern as it was previously. Mike has noted several factors to back his forecast while the crypto community remains optimistic in general.

BTC Price Prediction by Mike McGlone

The Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst had earlier stated a BTC price prediction of $10,000, signaling that the flagship token could stoop to that level as a lowest value. Mike McGlone reportedly warned that the crypto bubble was imploding, underlining a 85% chance for bitcoins to reach a low.

His forecast made its way to the market, among investors, only to face criticism. Many called his projection alarmist and risky for investors, possibly because statements like these could trigger massive selling. Mike has now revised his estimate to $28,000 on the grounds of historical price distribution.

The revised forecast has also met with criticism, with investors saying that it could distort positioning and put capital at risk.

Factors in Support

Mike has stated a few factors to support this projection for BTC price. He has said that it’s possible for the buy-the-dip mantra to be over. Another factor is a surge in stock markets with lower volatility in comparison to Bitcoin tokens, or cryptocurrencies in general.

Finally, he has said that Gold and Silver are also performing well for investors who are looking to book profits.

Notably, he has highlighted that the crypto sphere might be losing faith in Trump and his stance towards boosting the segment. Both his projections are reportedly being challenged by investors and crypto enthusiasts.

For instance, Quantum Economics Founder Mati Greenspan has published a post on X, and has said that the price prediction was done to stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.

Volatility for BTC

While price predictions are never certain, BTC does seem to be struggling with volatility. The figure of 11.75% currently features under the Very High category with an FGI of 7 points. Even a general price prediction has been revised to $71,355 in the next 3 months. It does sound optimistic but is down from the monthly projection of $77,018.

The flagship token is up by 1.51% over the last 24 hours, trading at $67,471.96 when the article is being written. Do your research thoroughly, and do not take the content of this article as advice or a recommendation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Weakens for Ethena (ENA): Will the Bears Deliver Another Blow?

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Mike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction and what was his previous prediction?

AMike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction is $28,000. His previous prediction was that the price could drop to $10,000 as a lowest value.

QWhat are some of the factors Mike McGlone cited to support his revised price forecast for Bitcoin?

AMcGlone cited several factors: the possibility that the 'buy-the-dip' mantra is over, a surge in stock markets with lower volatility compared to Bitcoin, and the strong performance of Gold and Silver for profit-seeking investors.

QHow did the crypto community generally react to Mike McGlone's price predictions?

AThe crypto community reacted with criticism to both of McGlone's predictions. Many labeled his initial $10,000 forecast as 'alarmist' and 'risky,' and his revised $28,000 prediction was also criticized for potentially distorting market positioning and putting capital at risk.

QAccording to the article, what is the current volatility status and Fear & Greed Index (FGI) reading for Bitcoin?

AThe article states that Bitcoin's volatility is currently at 11.75%, which is categorized as 'Very High,' and the Fear & Greed Index (FGI) is at 7 points.

QWhat was Mati Greenspan's criticism of Mike McGlone's price prediction?

AMati Greenspan, Founder of Quantum Economics, criticized the prediction, stating that it was done to 'stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.'

Letture associate

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit1 h fa

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit1 h fa

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 h fa

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 h fa

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit1 h fa

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit1 h fa

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit2 h fa

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit2 h fa

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 h fa

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures