Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-20

Introduzione

Mike McGlone, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, has revised his Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction upward from a previous low of $10,000 to $28,000, citing historical price distribution. However, he maintains a cautious outlook, suggesting the buy-the-dip strategy may be over and noting that traditional assets like stocks, gold, and silver are attracting investors with lower volatility compared to cryptocurrencies. His forecasts have faced criticism from the crypto community, with some labeling them as alarmist and potentially misleading. Despite the revision, broader concerns about Bitcoin's volatility persist, with current prices around $67,471.96 and a high volatility rating. The article emphasizes that this is not financial advice and encourages independent research.

Mike McGlobe, a Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst, has revised his BTC price prediction. While the number is still worrisome, it presents a comparatively better picture than before. Hence, keeping the broader concern as it was previously. Mike has noted several factors to back his forecast while the crypto community remains optimistic in general.

BTC Price Prediction by Mike McGlone

The Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst had earlier stated a BTC price prediction of $10,000, signaling that the flagship token could stoop to that level as a lowest value. Mike McGlone reportedly warned that the crypto bubble was imploding, underlining a 85% chance for bitcoins to reach a low.

His forecast made its way to the market, among investors, only to face criticism. Many called his projection alarmist and risky for investors, possibly because statements like these could trigger massive selling. Mike has now revised his estimate to $28,000 on the grounds of historical price distribution.

The revised forecast has also met with criticism, with investors saying that it could distort positioning and put capital at risk.

Factors in Support

Mike has stated a few factors to support this projection for BTC price. He has said that it’s possible for the buy-the-dip mantra to be over. Another factor is a surge in stock markets with lower volatility in comparison to Bitcoin tokens, or cryptocurrencies in general.

Finally, he has said that Gold and Silver are also performing well for investors who are looking to book profits.

Notably, he has highlighted that the crypto sphere might be losing faith in Trump and his stance towards boosting the segment. Both his projections are reportedly being challenged by investors and crypto enthusiasts.

For instance, Quantum Economics Founder Mati Greenspan has published a post on X, and has said that the price prediction was done to stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.

Volatility for BTC

While price predictions are never certain, BTC does seem to be struggling with volatility. The figure of 11.75% currently features under the Very High category with an FGI of 7 points. Even a general price prediction has been revised to $71,355 in the next 3 months. It does sound optimistic but is down from the monthly projection of $77,018.

The flagship token is up by 1.51% over the last 24 hours, trading at $67,471.96 when the article is being written. Do your research thoroughly, and do not take the content of this article as advice or a recommendation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Weakens for Ethena (ENA): Will the Bears Deliver Another Blow?

TagsBitcoin (BTC)BTC price

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Mike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction and what was his previous prediction?

AMike McGlone's revised BTC price prediction is $28,000. His previous prediction was that the price could drop to $10,000 as a lowest value.

QWhat are some of the factors Mike McGlone cited to support his revised price forecast for Bitcoin?

AMcGlone cited several factors: the possibility that the 'buy-the-dip' mantra is over, a surge in stock markets with lower volatility compared to Bitcoin, and the strong performance of Gold and Silver for profit-seeking investors.

QHow did the crypto community generally react to Mike McGlone's price predictions?

AThe crypto community reacted with criticism to both of McGlone's predictions. Many labeled his initial $10,000 forecast as 'alarmist' and 'risky,' and his revised $28,000 prediction was also criticized for potentially distorting market positioning and putting capital at risk.

QAccording to the article, what is the current volatility status and Fear & Greed Index (FGI) reading for Bitcoin?

AThe article states that Bitcoin's volatility is currently at 11.75%, which is categorized as 'Very High,' and the Fear & Greed Index (FGI) is at 7 points.

QWhat was Mati Greenspan's criticism of Mike McGlone's price prediction?

AMati Greenspan, Founder of Quantum Economics, criticized the prediction, stating that it was done to 'stack headlines instead of delivering an analysis in good faith.'

Letture associate

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit13 min fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit13 min fa

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit37 min fa

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit37 min fa

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit37 min fa

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit37 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片