"Black Monday" Strikes Again, Trump Becomes the "Flash Crash Engine" Once More?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-01-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-19

Introduzione

The cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp decline on Monday, with Bitcoin dropping below $92,000, Ethereum falling under $3,200, and Solana retreating to around $133. Over $593 million was liquidated in four hours, predominantly long positions. The primary trigger appears to be political and economic uncertainty stemming from former President Trump's actions. Key factors include a sudden shift in the frontrunner for the next Federal Reserve Chair. Kevin Hassett, a perceived dove, appears to be out of contention, while the odds for the more hawkish Kevin Warsh have surged to 60%. This potential change in leadership at the Fed has created market volatility. Furthermore, Trump's aggressive trade policies are causing global economic tensions. He has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25% on imports from several European nations, including Denmark, France, and Germany, linked to a dispute over Greenland. This has prompted threats of retaliatory tariffs from the EU. Trump also criticized the EU for its hefty fines on U.S. tech firms, calling them discriminatory. Adding to the market's woes, the U.S. Senate delayed a crucial crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, due to significant disagreements over stablecoin yields and DeFi regulations. This regulatory uncertainty contributed to the sell-off. In response to these combined macro pressures and after a recent price run-up, many traders are choosing to take profits and increase their cash holdings, expecting the ma...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Waking up, the crypto market has once again encountered a "Monday-style flash crash".

After BTC briefly climbed above $97,000 last week, its weekly closing price settled above $95,000. Just as the market anticipated that BTC would lead a broader recovery in the crypto market, a long-awaited "significant correction" struck again—within just a few hours, BTC once fell below $92,000, currently hovering around $92,750; ETH dropped below $3,200, now at around $3,213; SOL quickly fell below $140, currently around $133. Coinglass data shows that over the past 4 hours, the market saw liquidations of $593 million, with long positions accounting for a staggering $566 million; the number of liquidated traders reached 238,400 in 24 hours.

The main trigger for this "Black Monday" might once again be a series of unconventional moves by Trump.

Sudden Shift in the Fed Chair Nomination Situation: "Dove" Hassett Possibly Out, "Hawk" Kevin Warsh's Odds Soar

As the "heart of the US economic lifeline", the Federal Reserve has always played the role of the "invisible hand" in the US and even the global economic system due to its monetary privileges, independent status, and detached attitude. The person selected to lead the Fed is the most critical figure behind this "invisible hand". As the term of the current Chair Powell nears its end, the nominee for the new Chair is crucial and is therefore seen as a "market bellwether".

Previously, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was considered a frontrunner due to his "pro-Trump" and "pro-rate cut" dovish stance, but Trump had not given a clear indication. Recently, the shortlist for the new Fed Chair nominee has been narrowed down to four individuals: Fed Governor Christopher Waller, former Governor Kevin Warsh, BlackRock executive Rick Rieder, and Hassett. Recommended reading: Fed "Leadership Change" Countdown: Unveiling the 5 Major Candidates, Who is the Final Winner?.

Latest news suggests Hassett may be out, while Kevin Warsh's chances have surged. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett stated that Trump is likely to keep him in his current position, which would remove him from the running for the next Fed Chair. Last week, Trump expressed reservations about nominating Hassett to replace current Fed Chair Powell. During an event at the White House, he told the Director of the National Economic Council: "To be honest, I actually want you to stay where you are." Hassett, speaking about the White House on Sunday, also said: "There are many excellent candidates, and the President will make the right decision, likely believing that my best place is here (the White House) for now." He felt "flattered and grateful" for Trump's comments about his future, calling the President "such a good person". Recommended reading: Is BTC's "Strict Principal" Coming? If He Leads the Fed, the Crypto Party Might Grind to a Halt.

After Trump's remarks, traders on the prediction market site Kalshi raised the probability of Warsh getting the job to 60%, while Hassett and Waller's chances were only 16% and 14% respectively. Traders on Polymarket expressed a similar dynamic, with Warsh's support rate at 60%, Hassett's at 15%, and Waller's at 13%. Previously, Warsh and Hassett's odds were neck and neck.

Powell's term as Fed Chair ends on May 15th. The selection process is led by US Treasury Secretary Besant. Intriguingly, last evening, US Treasury Secretary Besant stated publicly: "Trump is committed to safeguarding the Fed's independence. We have four outstanding candidates for Fed Chair. I believe the Senate would be satisfied with any of these four candidates being selected."

Previously, Trump said he would appoint Powell's successor this month but did not provide a specific date. As Trump approaches his first full year back in office, the market might not yet have developed sufficient resilience to face his equivocal handling of matters, leading to a sharp drop in crypto market confidence and directly causing the market flash crash.

Trump's "Tariff War Hat-Trick": Greenland Dispute, EU-US Tariff War

On the other hand, looking at the overall global economic situation, unstable factors continue to increase.

Greenland Becomes a Focus of US-EU Politics, Tariff Storm Brews Again

As an EU overseas territory, Greenland has long been considered Denmark's "backyard". Now, this status quo might be about to change dramatically.

In May last year, Trump boldly stated that "military seizure of the island" was not off the table; half a year later, in early this year, this bold statement was reiterated by White House press secretary Levitt: The purchase of Greenland is currently being discussed. A military takeover of Greenland is not excluded; all options are on the table.

Following the "raid on the Venezuelan presidential palace and capture of Maduro", this foreign policy statement undoubtedly sent shockwaves through Greenland, multiple EU countries, and nations globally.

Previously, the Trump administration considered spending money to persuade Greenlanders to break away from Denmark and "join" the US, with the cost being one-time payments of $10,000 to $100,000 to Greenland's 57,000 inhabitants. It must be said, in the eyes of Trump, who never plays by the rules, politics is always ultimately a matter of "economic calculation".

Ultimately, this "Greenland crisis" evolved from a territorial dispute into a "high-tariff trade war"—on January 18th, Trump posted prominently, stating that due to the Greenland issue, effective February 1st, the US would impose a 10% tariff on all goods exported to the US from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, with plans to raise the rate to 25% on June 1st. These tariff measures will remain in effect until an agreement is reached on the "complete and thorough purchase of Greenland". This shows his resolute attitude,堪称 "not stopping until the goal is achieved".

In response to this news, multiple EU countries are considering imposing tariffs on $93 billion worth of US goods exported to Europe.

In April last year, a similar "tariff trade war" was first initiated by Trump, and now, this factor remains key to affecting the crypto market and the global economy.

Furthermore, Trump's move is not only about "territorial dispute" but also carries a sense of "economic counterattack".

Trump: EU's Huge Fines on US Tech Companies Are Extremely Unfair

On January 15th, US President Trump stated publicly that the EU's massive fines on US tech companies are extremely unfair and represent discriminatory actions targeting superior US technology and taxation. Relevant data shows that in 2024, the total fines imposed by the EU on US tech companies reached €3.8 billion, while the total corporate income tax paid by all listed European internet tech companies in the same period was only €3.2 billion. Currently, US tech giants like Apple, Google, and Meta are facing fines or back-tax rulings amounting to billions of euros from the EU. It's clear that regarding economic sovereignty, Trump has long been dissatisfied with the EU's "high-pressure policies".

Stalled "Crypto-Friendly Bill" Might Be a Potential Factor in Market Decline: CLARITY Faces Consensus Crisis

Apart from macro-level influencing events, the受阻 (stalled) CLARITY bill, closely related to the crypto market, might also have contributed to the sudden increase in sell-offs and the price flash crash.

Viewpoint: US Senate Crypto Market Structure Bill Delayed, Regulatory Uncertainty Heats Up, Related Assets Under Pressure

Galaxy Digital Head of Research Alex Thorn previously stated, The postponement of the US Senate Banking Committee's scheduled review meeting for the crypto market structure bill highlights deep-seated disagreements between Congress and the industry on several key issues, particularly集中在 (focusing on) stablecoin revenue mechanisms and DeFi-related clauses.

This delay occurred just hours after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew his support for the bill. Armstrong publicly opposed the bill's provisions regarding tokenized securities, DeFi restrictions, and stablecoin yields. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott subsequently announced the postponement of the hearing but has not yet released a new schedule. As the Senate is on recess next week, the earliest possible restart date is between January 26th and 30th.

Alex Thorn pointed out that within just 48 hours, the draft bill was released late at night, over 100 amendments were submitted, and stakeholders kept discovering new points of contention until the last moment, significantly increasing the difficulty of political coordination. On the market front, following the announcement of the delay, crypto assets generally declined, with Bitcoin and Ethereum falling about 2% that day; related US stocks also came under pressure simultaneously, with Coinbase down 6.5%, Robinhood down 7.8%, and Circle down 9.7%.

He believes that although consensus has been largely reached on "market structure" itself, highly sensitive non-core issues surrounding stablecoin yields, DeFi compliance, and granting the SEC regulatory tools in the field of tokenized securities have created a political fault line that is difficult to cross. "The surface gap in disagreements is not large, but the substantive chasm is deep".

Previously, several tokenization companies including Securitize, Dinari, and Superstate rebutted Coinbase's opposing remarks regarding the CLARITY bill. For more details, recommended reading: CLARITY Review Suddenly Postponed, Why Is the Industry Divide So Severe?.

Summary: Correction May Continue, Traders Taking Stage Profits

Last weekend, trader Eugene posted on his personal channel, stating that because the market performance of related investment targets did not meet expectations, he chose to take stage profits and has now basically exited altcoin long positions. However, core Bitcoin long positions are still held, while cash positions have been significantly increased to wait for the next round of trading布局 (layout/positioning).

As BTC rebounded from the $85,000-$90,000 consolidation range to above $97,000, considering factors such as macro interest rate cut expectations, the world political and economic situation, and rising prices of precious metals like gold and silver, taking profits might be the best choice.

From this perspective, the correction in the crypto market may continue in the short term. Whether it can resume the bull market curve might, like last year, still depend on hoping for Trump's "TACO-style performance".

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main reason for the 'Black Monday' flash crash in the crypto market according to the article?

AThe main reason was a series of actions by Trump, particularly the sudden shift in the nomination for the new Federal Reserve Chair, with Kevin Warsh's likelihood of selection surging, which reduced market confidence.

QWho were the top candidates for the next Federal Reserve Chair as mentioned, and whose chances increased significantly?

AThe top candidates were Kevin Hassett, Christopher Waller, Kevin Warsh, and Rick Rieder. Kevin Warsh's chances increased significantly to 60%, while Hassett's and Waller's dropped to around 15%.

QWhat tariff action did Trump take against several European countries, and what was it related to?

ATrump imposed a 10% tariff on all goods exported to the US from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, related to the dispute over Greenland, with plans to increase it to 25% if no agreement on purchasing Greenland is reached.

QWhy did the CLARITY Act face delays, and what was one major point of contention?

AThe CLARITY Act faced delays due to deep disagreements on key issues, particularly around stablecoin yield mechanisms and DeFi-related clauses, highlighted by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrawing his support.

QHow did the market react to the delay in the CLARITY Act, and which companies were affected?

AFollowing the delay, crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum fell by about 2%, and related stocks such as Coinbase dropped 6.5%, Robinhood 7.8%, and Circle 9.7%.

Letture associate

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit12 min fa

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit12 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit28 min fa

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit28 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片