Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capitals Frenziedly Betting on New Public Blockchains? The Answer Lies in These Three Points

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-14

Introduzione

Recently, a wave of major funding announcements for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo signals a significant industry shift. This article analyzes the driving forces behind this surge. Firstly, regulatory clarity is a key catalyst. These massive investments, including Circle's Arc ($222M), Digital Asset's Canton ($300M), and Stripe's Tempo ($500M), all followed the US passage of the *Genius Act* in July 2025. This suggests that clear legislation is unlocking institutional capital. The anticipated, broader *Clarity Act* could further accelerate growth, particularly in tokenization and compliant infrastructure. Secondly, built-in privacy is emerging as a critical design feature. Unlike Ethereum or Solana, these new chains natively support confidential transactions. This directly addresses real-world business needs, where public transparency can be a liability for corporate dealings or personal salary data, making privacy a potential killer application. Finally, the entry of traditional giants marks a new competitive phase. These projects are backed by major firms: Arc by Circle, Canton by a consortium including Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq, and Tempo by Stripe with partners like Visa. While crypto-native projects remain strong contenders, this institutional involvement brings substantial capital, execution capability, and operational rigor. In conclusion, the convergence of regulatory progress, demand for privacy, and competition from established financial and t...

Industry news often emerges in clusters. Such moments deserve high attention, as a major trend is undoubtedly unfolding behind them.

Just this Monday, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that its new blockchain project, Arc, completed a $222 million funding round, reaching an overall valuation of $3 billion. The investor lineup is impressive, including top-tier institutions like BlackRock, Apollo Funds, and the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, among others.

Just the day before, news emerged about another emerging blockchain, Canton Network, developed by Digital Asset: led by a16z, it raised $300 million at a valuation of $2 billion.

Similarly, Stripe's blockchain, Tempo, has been leading the track: it completed a $500 million funding round at the end of last year, reaching a valuation of $5 billion, and later announced strategic partnerships with companies like DoorDash and Visa.

Arc, Canton, and Tempo are all public blockchains tailored for stablecoin and asset tokenization scenarios. This wave of concentrated funding activity has led me to summarize three crucial insights for the crypto industry.

Capital Always Follows Regulatory Legislation

These several hundred-million-dollar funding rounds all occurred after the US Congress passed the 'Genius Act' in July 2025.

I have always believed that before the act's passage, the sluggish and slow progress of US crypto legislation directly dampened industry investment enthusiasm; major institutions were unwilling to rashly deploy capital or build blockchain infrastructure amid unclear regulatory prospects. Now, with regulation clarified, the industry landscape is changing.

No one can be sure whether these projects could maintain their current valuations or secure such large funding rounds without the protection of the 'Genius Act,' but it is certain that regulatory clarity has played a key facilitating role.

For investors, the most thought-provoking question is: If the comprehensive market structure bill for the crypto industry, the 'Clarity Act,' successfully passes Congress, how much industry opportunity will it unlock?

The coverage breadth of the 'Clarity Act' far exceeds that of the 'Genius Act,' and the final text of the bill is not yet set, making it impossible to precisely predict its impact scope at this time. However, it is certain that the asset tokenization track and compliant financial infrastructure will be the biggest beneficiaries. I also hope the final version of the bill will simultaneously benefit decentralized finance, innovative token design, and other areas, but specifics will depend on the official text. The 'Clarity Act' deserves everyone's continuous tracking.

Privacy Protection May Become a Phenomenal Core Application

Arc, Canton, and Tempo share a common feature, which is also their biggest distinction from Ethereum and Solana: all three blockchains natively have private transaction functionality built-in.

As crypto assets gradually integrate into mainstream commercial scenarios, this design logic fits real-world needs very well. The public transparency of a public blockchain, originally the cornerstone of trust-building, can become a shortcoming in commercial settings.

Businesses do not want every pending transaction to be publicly visible, and professionals do not want their salary details to be easily queryable by anyone via a block explorer. In these cases, public transparency is no longer an advantage but a real pain point.

Even the staunchest supporters of blockchain transparency must admit: the business world inherently requires a degree of privacy and confidentiality of information. These three emerging blockchains have pre-embedded privacy features at the foundational design level, accurately addressing the genuine needs of traditional institutions. The recent rounds of high-value funding confirm: the direction of this track is completely correct.

Traditional Giants Officially Enter the Race

The most special aspect of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their backing by top-tier enterprises and financial institutions.

· Arc is led and developed by the publicly-traded company Circle;

· Canton's backers include Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, Virtu, among others;

· Tempo is jointly built by payment giant Stripe and crypto VC Paradigm, with companies like Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI participating in the project's architecture design.

In contrast, the older generation of blockchains is quite different: Ethereum was initiated by a 19-year-old dropout on a Bitcoin forum, and Solana was conceived from a moment of inspiration by a Qualcomm engineer.

Of course, this does not mean traditional giants are guaranteed to win. Personally, I remain more bullish on crypto-native projects in the long term. However, it is undeniable that the entry of banks and large tech corporations brings more substantial capital, stronger execution capabilities for real-world implementation, and more professional, standardized operations to the industry.

Competition fosters growth. I believe that through the bidirectional competition between giants and native projects, the innovation speed and developmental boundaries of the entire crypto industry will be further expanded.

After all, steel sharpens steel; competition and cooperation give rise to progress.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent surge in large-scale funding for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo according to the article?

AThe recent surge in large-scale funding is primarily attributed to the clarification of U.S. regulatory landscape, specifically following the passage of the *Genius Act* by the U.S. Congress in July 2025, which reduced regulatory uncertainty and boosted investor confidence.

QWhat is a key technological design feature that distinguishes Arc, Canton, and Tempo from established chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AA key distinguishing feature of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their native, built-in private transaction functionality, addressing the privacy needs of mainstream business applications where public transparency can be a disadvantage.

QWhich traditional financial and corporate giants are mentioned as being involved in the development or backing of the new public blockchains discussed?

AThe article mentions involvement from major traditional institutions: Arc is led by Circle; Canton's backers include Goldman Sachs, Citadel, DTCC, Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu; Tempo is built by Stripe and Paradigm, with design input from Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI.

QWhat potential future legislation does the article suggest could unlock even greater opportunities for the crypto industry, and in which areas?

AThe article suggests the potential passage of the broader *Clarity Act* could unlock significant opportunities, particularly in the areas of asset tokenization and compliant financial infrastructure, possibly also benefiting decentralized finance (DeFi) and innovative token design.

QHow does the article contrast the origins of new chains like Arc, Canton, Tempo with those of older chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AThe article contrasts their origins by noting that Arc, Canton, and Tempo are backed by established corporations and financial giants, whereas Ethereum was founded by a teenager on a Bitcoin forum and Solana was conceived by a former Qualcomm engineer, highlighting a shift from crypto-native origins to institutional involvement.

Letture associate

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手5 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片