Bitwise: This Weekend's Surge Accelerates the On-Chain Migration of the Financial World

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

Financial migration to the blockchain is inevitable, and recent geopolitical events have dramatically accelerated this shift. Traditional markets operate with delays, high costs, and limited hours, but blockchain enables 24/7 global trading, instant settlement, and lower costs. While many assumed this transition would take 5–10 years, a weekend military strike against Iran—occurring when almost all traditional markets were closed—proved a turning point. On February 28, during widespread market closures, decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid saw explosive activity. Hyperliquid’s oil perpetual contracts became a key price reference, even cited by Bloomberg. Tether’s gold token XAUT reached over $300 million in trading volume, and prediction markets like Polymarket hit record highs. For the first time, crypto markets functioned as the primary real-time financial system during a major event. This event underscores that investors, funds, and institutions can no longer ignore on-chain finance. The barrier to entry—learning wallets, stablecoins, and DeFi platforms—is diminishing as necessity drives adoption. Once engaged, users gain access to a faster, more open financial system. Critics may argue extended traditional hours could suffice, but history shows that disruptive technology, like blockchain, often outperforms incremental improvements. The move to on-chain finance is happening faster than anyone expected.

I have always believed that the migration of the financial industry to on-chain is inevitable.

Blockchain enables assets to be traded 24/7, 365 days a year, with instant settlement and costs far lower than the traditional system. It makes traditional stock trading platforms and T+1 settlement seem incredibly antiquated.

But I've always wondered: When exactly will this transition happen? And what event will catalyze the system's complete transformation?

After all, most people don't feel the delays of the current system. When my uncle buys stocks in his Charles Schwab account, he doesn't care that it takes a day to settle, nor does he care about the complex processes involving mysterious institutions like the NSCC, DTCC, and Cede & Co. He buys, the stock appears in his account, simple and straightforward, no fuss.

So I once thought that crypto-driven markets would grow on the fringes first. Over the next 5 to 10 years, they would primarily serve crypto-native users and those who don't fit perfectly into the traditional financial system, like global retail investors wanting to trade U.S. stocks. Eventually, these systems would become good enough to gradually take over the existing system, and institutions like the NYSE would transition to tokenized markets, much like they moved from floor trading to electronic trading.

This would be a classic tech story: disrupt the edges first, then take over the core. I thought this would take 5 to 10 years.

But this weekend proved me wrong. I am now convinced that this will happen much faster than anyone anticipated.

What Happened This Weekend

At 2:30 AM EST on Sunday, February 28th, Trump announced a strike against Iran. This timing is very specific for global financial markets; almost all markets were closed.


· U.S. stock markets were closed
· U.S. futures markets were closed
· Major forex markets were closed
· European markets were closed
· Asian markets were closed

Essentially, the only markets still trading were those in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Middle Eastern countries (which operate on a Sunday-to-Thursday schedule), but these markets are limited in size and scope, with little participation from Western investors and covering few assets.

In the past, if a major geopolitical shock occurred on a Sunday morning, investors would have had to wait until 6:00 PM Sunday evening for U.S. futures to open to see the market's reaction. But this weekend showed us: they now have another choice—turning to the 24/7, globally traded crypto infrastructure.

And this weekend, they actually did it.

Throughout Sunday, on-chain finance became the core of global finance. The decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, in particular, was the focal point. It offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets as well as real-world assets like crude oil.

Hyperliquid's trading volume surged so much that Bloomberg, in its coverage of the airstrike's impact on oil, directly cited the price of the crude oil contract on Hyperliquid as the most significant reference price. This was no coincidence; Hyperliquid's native token, HYPE, rose about 30% over the weekend. In my view, this is more like investors paying upfront for its future.

But it wasn't just Hyperliquid. The trading volume for XAUT, a gold token issued by Tether, soared to over $300 million in 24 hours. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket hit record trading volumes. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets were also in the spotlight.

In my memory, this is the first time the cryptocurrency market has truly functioned as a "market" in the real sense.

Why This Matters

If you are a hedge fund, a bank, or any investor who wants to stay competitive, you now have no choice: you must open a stablecoin wallet, you must learn to trade on Hyperliquid, you must understand XAUT, you must research tokenized stocks.

Because even if you don't, someone else will.

This trend will accelerate. The biggest barrier to participating in on-chain markets is getting used to tools like wallets, stablecoins, Hyperliquid, and Uniswap. Once you get the hang of it, all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance are within reach. Exposure leads to exploration, and exploration leads to trading.

Of course, some will surely say: Traditional markets can do this too! Nasdaq is moving towards 23-hour trading, 5 days a week! We don't offer 24/7 trading because no one needs it!

Fine, whatever. That's what Blockbuster said about Netflix, and what Microsoft said about the iPhone.

The shift to on-chain finance is inevitable. And after this weekend, I am certain: its arrival will be much sooner than any of us imagined.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what event over the weekend accelerated the migration of the financial world on-chain?

AThe announcement of a U.S. military strike on Iran in the early hours of Sunday, February 28th, a time when almost all traditional global financial markets were closed.

QWhich on-chain platform became a focal point for trading during the weekend's market closure and was even cited by Bloomberg?

AThe decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, which offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets and real-world assets like crude oil.

QWhat is the author's view on the traditional argument that 24/7 trading is unnecessary?

AThe author dismisses this argument, comparing it to past dismissals of disruptive technologies like Netflix by Blockbuster and the iPhone by Microsoft, and believes the shift to on-chain finance is inevitable and will happen sooner than expected.

QWhat specific asset, issued by Tether, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge to over $300 million during this event?

ATether's gold token, XAUT.

QWhat does the author identify as the biggest hurdle for participating in on-chain markets, and what is the consequence of overcoming it?

AThe biggest hurdle is getting accustomed to the tools like wallets, stablecoins, and platforms like Hyperliquid and Uniswap. Once this is overcome, it leads to exploration and, subsequently, more trading activity as all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance become accessible.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit4 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit4 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit24 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit24 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit32 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit32 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片