Bitwise Files With SEC to Launch First Uniswap ETF in U.S. Markets

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-06

Introduzione

Bitwise Asset Management has filed with the SEC to launch the first U.S. ETF focused solely on Uniswap’s UNI token. The proposed fund aims to provide regulated exposure to UNI through a conventional investment vehicle, without staking the tokens. Coinbase Custody is set to serve as the custodian. This filing follows the SEC’s recent conclusion of its investigation into Uniswap Labs, easing regulatory concerns. If approved, the ETF would mark a significant step in offering institutional and retail investors traditional access to a DeFi governance token, reflecting growing demand for regulated crypto investment products.

Bitwise Asset Management has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch an exchange-traded fund focused on Uniswap. The offering would give investors regulated exposure to the governing UNI token via a traditional investment vehicle. If approved, it will become the first ETF to focus on a DeFi protocol token in the United States.

The Bitwise Uniswap ETF would have the UNI token as its main asset for tracking investor exposure. “The Trust’s investment objective is to provide exposure to the value of UNI, less the Trust’s expenses”. If approved, Coinbase Custody Trust Company will serve as the ETF custodian. Meanwhile, Bitwise has confirmed there will be no staking of UNI tokens associated with the proposed ETF at the time of its inception.

On Thursday, the SEC officially made the filing, bringing the product a step closer to the general financial markets. Indeed, access to DeFi coins via traditional applications has been a major focus for the firm, as stated, as an emerging trend with institutional investment demand. Brokerage accounts could potentially facilitate the ETF, opening more avenues for the UNI asset class. This filing will be part of a trend in crypto ETF filings in the U.S., which started in 2021 with the change in regulations.

Regulatory and Market Context

This comes when the SEC concluded its investigation into the case involving Uniswap Labs last year, which eased regulation issues facing the decentralized finance protocols. Delaware statutory trust filings were the foundation before submitting to the SEC for its approval. Trust filings are technical processes before an actual filing is made to the SEC.

An actual filing of the S-1 form signifies their readiness to start the regulatory process for their Uniswap ETF product. Analysts have revealed that it remains to be seen when the ETF will complete the review and approval process when it is sent to the SEC for processing. The ETF’s standard to trade on the US stock exchange will be determined by the SEC.

Bitwise filing for a Uniswap ETF with the SEC marks a new milestone for bringing a DeFi governance token into a regulated investment product. The new fund would be designed to give investors traditional exposure to UNI without token staking, pending regulatory approval. This action underscores ongoing institutional appetite for regulated crypto-investment vehicles linked to decentralized finance protocols.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Public Retirement Funds Hit by Sharp Decline Amid Bitcoin Slump

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main asset that the Bitwise Uniswap ETF will use to track investor exposure?

AThe UNI token.

QWhich company will serve as the custodian for the proposed Bitwise Uniswap ETF?

ACoinbase Custody Trust Company.

QWhat significant regulatory event involving Uniswap Labs occurred last year, as mentioned in the article?

AThe SEC concluded its investigation into the case involving Uniswap Labs.

QWhat type of filing with the SEC signifies Bitwise's readiness to start the regulatory process for the Uniswap ETF?

AThe filing of an S-1 form.

QAccording to the article, what will the proposed ETF NOT involve at the time of its inception?

AStaking of UNI tokens.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit27 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit27 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit35 min fa

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit35 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News39 min fa

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News39 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit46 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit46 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit55 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit55 min fa

Trading

Spot