BitMart Research Institute's Weekly Hotspot Analysis: U.S.-Iran Détente Coupled with Fed's Hawkish Pivot, Crypto Market Follows Suit in Rebound and Bottoming

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-14

Introduzione

BitMart Research Weekly Analysis: U.S.-Iran De-escalation and Fed’s Hawkish Turn Drive Crypto Market Rebound and Bottom-Building Macro Overview: Geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran show signs of easing, supporting a rebound in risk assets including equities and oil. U.S. stocks, particularly in AI-related sectors, rebounded strongly. The latest FOMC minutes revealed a more hawkish tone, with “rate hikes” entering discussions, though the majority of members remain focused on labor market conditions. March CPI rose due to energy prices, but core CPI was softer. Sustained high oil prices may push supercore inflation higher in the coming months, potentially influencing Fed policy. Crypto Market Performance: BTC and ETH followed the upward trend in equities, supported by improved risk sentiment and expectations around crypto regulatory clarity (e.g., Clarity Act). However, some long-term indicators suggest the market may still be in a bear phase or experiencing bottom consolidation. The $60,000 level is seen as a key support for BTC. Altcoins lack fundamental drivers and remain highly volatile with strong manipulative tendencies, making BTC and ETH more reliable for strategic allocation. Trading and Fund Flows: Spot trading volume remains low, but active buying interest is noticeable. Perpetual swap funding rates are negative, indicating short dominance, while options markets show no significant rise in fear. Bitcoin ETFs recorded net inflows, including a sing...

I. Macro Level (Macro)

Geopolitics and U.S. Stock Market Performance

Signs of easing emerged in the U.S.-Iran conflict, with the differences in negotiations being smaller than market expectations, prompting a rapid recovery in the prices of risk assets, including crude oil. Against this backdrop, coupled with the pressure from the U.S. election and the potential for easing Sino-U.S. trade relations, U.S. stocks, particularly those in the AI upstream supply chain and individual stocks like Oracle, experienced a strong oversold rebound. Currently, upward repair remains the path of least resistance. However, geopolitical tail risks remain high, and trading is still challenging.

Federal Reserve Monetary Policy (FOMC)

The latest FOMC meeting minutes revealed that internal divisions within the Fed have widened compared to the past, with the "interest rate hike" option explicitly included in the discussions, indicating a somewhat hawkish pivot in the overall stance. Nevertheless, most members still prioritize the fragile balance in the labor market, and the market generally expects the actual probability of a rate hike this year to remain low.

Inflation Data (CPI) and Potential Inflation Risks

The overall CPI for March rose significantly driven by energy prices, but the core CPI was slightly lower than expected, indicating that the transmission of energy prices to core goods and services is not yet significant for the time being. However, if oil prices remain persistently high above $80, they are likely to gradually transmit to supercore inflation over the next 3 to 6 months. This could not only lead to upside risks in inflation data in the coming months but also prompt a further hawkish shift in the Fed's stance. Additionally, due to base effects from the same period last year, next month's housing rent data might show an abnormal jump.

II. Cryptocurrency Level (Crypto)

Market Trend and Overall Expectations

In the recent rebound, although BTC and ETH did not stand out as prominently as during the previous phase of resilience, they still followed the rebound in U.S. stocks. Benefiting from the overall recovery in risk appetite in U.S. stocks and continued strengthening of policy positives such as the expected passage of the crypto bill (Clarity Act), the overall expectations for the Crypto market this year remain optimistic. However, some long-term macro indicators (such as Glassnode-related data) suggest that the current market may still be in a bear market phase or in a range of repeated fluctuations at the bottom of a bear market, which aligns with Glassnode strategists' judgment of the market cycle.

Divergence Between BTC, ETH, and Altcoins

There is still some divergence in the market regarding the bottom position of Bitcoin, but the support level near $60,000 is relatively solid—this level was quickly reached due to fund liquidations, thus holding certain reference value. It is expected to become the阶段性 (staged) bottom for a new round of upward trends and is closely watched by various market participants. In contrast, the altcoin market overall lacks fundamental support, exhibiting more characteristics of "strong manipulation," primarily relying on contract liquidations and funding rate arbitrage for profits, with highly volatile prices, placing retail investors at a clear disadvantage. Therefore, the meeting建议 (suggests) shifting the allocation focus more towards BTC and ETH at this stage to enhance the robustness of the strategy.

Trading Micro Data and Capital Flows

Spot and Futures: Overall spot trading volume remains low, but the active buying volume (CVD) remains high, reflecting that some "smart money" is actively participating in the rebound. Meanwhile, catalyzed by factors such as geopolitics, trading热度 (heat) in the futures market has increased, with overall funding rates偏向负 (leaning negative) (i.e., shorts paying funding to longs), while the options market shows that panic sentiment has not further expanded.

Institutional Funds: Bitcoin ETFs overall showed net inflows last week, for example, with a single-day net inflow reaching $421 million. Looking at the recent Bitcoin ETF行情 (performance), they have maintained a trend of震荡净流入 (oscillating net inflows), reflecting institutions' willingness for long-term布局 (layout) in crypto assets;同时 (At the same time), MicroStrategy's recent pace of increasing holdings has明显加快 (significantly accelerated), purchasing nearly 14,000 Bitcoins in the recent phase, further increasing its cumulative holding scale, continuing its strategy of long-term Bitcoin accumulation.

This article is for market trend analysis only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset investment carries high risks; investors should make prudent choices and bear the relevant risks themselves.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the main factors driving the recent rebound in the crypto market according to the article?

AThe rebound is driven by easing US-Iran tensions, a potential improvement in US-China trade relations, and increased risk appetite in US stocks, particularly in the AI upstream industry chain and stocks like Oracle. Additionally, expectations for the Clarity Act and institutional inflows into Bitcoin ETFs have supported the market.

QHow did the latest FOMC meeting minutes reflect the Federal Reserve's stance on monetary policy?

AThe FOMC meeting minutes showed an expanded internal divergence among Fed members, with the 'interest rate hike' option explicitly included in discussions, indicating a hawkish shift. However, most members still prioritize the fragile balance of the labor market, and the actual probability of a rate hike this year remains low.

QWhat potential risks to inflation does the article highlight for the coming months?

AThe article highlights that if oil prices remain above $80 per barrel, it could gradually transmit to supercore inflation over the next 3 to 6 months, posing upside risks to future inflation data. Additionally, next month's housing rent data might show an abnormal jump due to base effects from the same period last year.

QWhat is the suggested investment strategy for cryptocurrencies based on the current market conditions?

AThe article suggests shifting the allocation focus more towards BTC and ETH to enhance strategy robustness, as altcoins lack fundamental support and are characterized by high volatility and strong market manipulation, putting retail investors at a disadvantage.

QHow did institutional investors behave in the crypto market recently, as mentioned in the article?

AInstitutional investors showed increased participation, with Bitcoin ETFs experiencing net inflows, such as a single-day net inflow of $421 million. MicroStrategy also accelerated its buying pace, purchasing nearly 14,000 BTC recently, further expanding its cumulative holdings and continuing its long-term Bitcoin accumulation.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit25 min fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit25 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit35 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit35 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片