BIT Research: Why Could Gold Rush to $5,000 Faster After the Sudden Plunge?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-08

Introduzione

The article "BIT Research: After Gold's Sharp Decline, Why Could It Reach $5,000 Faster?" presents a bullish outlook for gold despite recent price drops. It argues that the core bullish structure remains intact, with the recent sell-off seen as a correction rather than a trend reversal. The primary drivers are expected to be a re-pricing of the US dollar and the interest rate path. The market currently prices in a potential 2026 rate hike, yet simultaneously expects a more dovish stance from incoming Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, creating a contradiction. A correction of these expectations could weaken the dollar and lower real rates, fueling gold's ascent. Additionally, the expanding US national debt provides long-term structural support. Technically, gold is forming a consolidation pattern with higher lows, suggesting underlying strength. Quantitative and trend models have turned bullish, with historical data from similar signals pointing to an average ~12.8% gain over two months, projecting a target near $5,306. Key upcoming catalysts include the June FOMC meeting, the July BRICS summit, and the September US fiscal cliff. In summary, the convergence of a potential dollar downturn, interest rate re-pricing, supportive technicals, and upcoming macro events could propel gold into a new phase of accelerated growth, with $5,300 as a near-term target.

The market is currently in a macro repricing stage dominated by US dollar trends and the interest rate path. Although gold has experienced a notable correction recently, its overall bull market structure remains intact. The market is repricing rate hike risks for this year on one hand, while on the other hand, it widely expects the next Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, to adopt a relatively dovish policy stance. This creates significant tension and implies that the current market pricing for the rate path may be unsustainable. Once the market begins to correct these expectations, the US dollar could weaken again, and real interest rates are also expected to fall, thereby reopening the upside for gold.

From a trading signal perspective, quantitative and trend models have recently strengthened simultaneously. Historical data shows that after similar signals were triggered in the past 10 instances, gold's average gain over the following two months was about 12.8%, corresponding to a target price of approximately $5,306, with a historical win rate of about 70%. Meanwhile, the DXY attempted to break the 100 level three times—in July 2025, November 2025, and March 2026—but failed each time, indicating weakening momentum for the dollar's rebound. Against this backdrop, this article views the current correction as more akin to a phase of consolidation rather than a trend reversal.

Repricing of the Dollar and Interest Rates: Gold's Core Thesis Remains Unchanged

For the coming months, the most critical variable for gold will still be the repricing of the US interest rate path. Powell has confirmed the late-April FOMC meeting will be his last as Chair, while the June 17 FOMC meeting will be the first under Kevin Warsh's leadership. Warsh has previously stated on multiple occasions that the productivity boost from AI has deflationary effects, and the market widely expects his policy stance to be more dovish compared to the current one.

However, at the same time, the market has completely priced out rate cuts for this year and has even begun pricing in one rate hike. This pricing logic itself contains a clear contradiction. If the June dot plot begins to counter the current expectation of "one rate hike this year," gold could rapidly repricing. The September 16 FOMC meeting is also seen as a critical window; historically, after rate cuts in September 2024 and 2025, both gold and Bitcoin showed significant rallies.

Simultaneously, US debt expansion and fiscal pressures are strengthening gold's long-term narrative. The current US debt level has reached $39 trillion, an increase of about $2.7 trillion since the passage of the "Big and Beautiful Act" in July 2025. Gold has corrected, but the debt has not shrunk. Once the market refocuses on liquidity and fiscal expansion logic, gold is poised to challenge its historical highs again.

Synchronized Improvement in Technicals and Fund Flows: Gold May Enter a New Upward Phase

From a technical perspective, gold's current structure remains positive. During this correction, gold found significant support in the $4,300-$4,400 range and subsequently established a higher low around $4,500 in early May. Continuously higher lows signify that the bull market structure remains intact. Currently, gold is consolidating within a narrow triangle pattern; an upward breakout could pave the way for a renewed challenge of previous all-time highs.

Historically, gold's long-term trend has advanced in approximately $1,000 increments. Therefore, $5,300 could be a reasonable target for the next phase, while $6,300 might become a potential target for late this year or next. Furthermore, several potential catalysts are approaching in the coming months, including the "Trump–Xi Jinping" meeting in May, the June FOMC, the BRICS summit in July, and the US fiscal cliff in September. As the market begins to reprice the paths for the dollar, interest rates, and liquidity, gold's relative appeal is likely to strengthen further.

Overall, although this gold correction has been significant in magnitude, the trend structure has not been broken. A weaker dollar, repricing of the interest rate path, global reserve diversification, and US fiscal pressures are gradually converging into a new macro resonance. Concurrently, quantitative and trend models have strengthened simultaneously, and multiple key catalysts are set to materialize in the coming months. For the market, the key at this stage is no longer just short-term inflation fluctuations, but when the market refocuses on liquidity and accommodative policy logic. Once this process begins, gold could re-enter a new phase of accelerated gains.

Some of the views above are derived from BIT on Target. Contact us for the full BIT on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market carries risks, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Trading digital assets can involve significant risk and volatility. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. BIT assumes no responsibility for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what is the core reason behind the argument that gold could still reach $5,000 despite its recent decline?

AThe core reason is a potential reassessment of the U.S. interest rate path and a weakening US Dollar. The article points to a contradiction in current market pricing, which factors in a 2025 rate hike while expecting a more dovish Fed under the incoming Chair Kevin Warsh. A correction of this expectation could weaken the Dollar and lower real interest rates, reopening upside for gold.

QWhat historical performance data does the article cite to support its bullish outlook for gold?

AThe article cites data from quantitative and trend-following models, stating that in the 10 previous instances of similar signals, gold achieved an average gain of approximately 12.8% over the following two months, with a historical win rate of around 70%. This average gain corresponds to a target price of about $5,306.

QWhich key upcoming events are highlighted as potential catalysts for gold's price movement?

AThe article mentions several key upcoming events as potential catalysts: the May "Trump-Xi Jinping" meeting, the June FOMC meeting (Kevin Warsh's first as Chair), the July BRICS summit, and the September US fiscal cliff.

QWhat technical pattern is gold currently forming according to the article, and what are the identified support levels?

AAccording to the article, gold is currently forming a narrow triangular consolidation pattern. Key support levels identified are the $4,300-$4,400 range and the $4,500 level, where the price stabilized after forming a higher low in early May.

QBesides interest rates and the Dollar, what other long-term fundamental factor is mentioned as supporting gold's value?

AThe article cites expanding U.S. debt and fiscal pressure as a long-term supportive factor for gold. It notes the U.S. debt has grown by about $2.7 trillion since July 2025, and a renewed market focus on liquidity and fiscal expansion could push gold to challenge its previous highs.

Letture associate

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit44 min fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit44 min fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News1 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News1 h fa

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit1 h fa

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit1 h fa

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit2 h fa

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片