Berachain faces Feb 6th deadline – Will Nova refund trigger a crash?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-18

Introduzione

Berachain's BERA token recently surged, gaining 15.48% in 24 hours and 62.58% over the week. The rally began on January 14th following the announcement of the "Bera Builds Businesses" model, signaling a strategic shift toward generating real cash flow. However, risks remain. The chain’s TVL has dropped significantly from $3 billion to $178 million, and it faces scrutiny over downside protection offered to an institutional investor. A key concern is the February 6th, 2026 deadline for Brevan Howard’s Nova fund refund clause, casting doubt on the rally's timing. Despite strong bullish momentum on charts, investors are advised to proceed with caution and consider taking profits.

Berachain [BERA] was seizing attention and capital flows recently.

Over the past 24 hours, the DeFi liquidity-focused blockchain token has rallied 15.48% in the past 24 hours, and was up 62.58% in a week.

Why is BERA rallying?

The gains began on the 14th of January, when BERA prices were at $0.593 at the beginning of the day. The Berachain end-of-year update sent prices soaring after the introduction of the “Bera Builds Businesses” model.

This model illustrated the Berachain Foundation’s move towards cash flow.

As part of its bid to become an established blockchain, the chain will “internally build, acquire, or partner closely with a small set of businesses that directly create value” for the BERA token.

The threats ahead for investors

While this was exceedingly positive news for investors, some threats were lurking. Earlier in 2025, the Total Value Locked (TVL) on the chain had plunged from $3 billion. It was only $178 million at the time of writing, DeFiLlama data showed.

It also faced increased scrutiny after an investigation revealed it gave an institutional investor downside protection.

This is a rare, controversial provision that is generally not applicable in the industry to underperforming assets.

The deadline for the BERA refund clause for Brevan Howard’s Nova fund is the 6th of February, 2026. That is why the timing of the current rally is suspect.

Investors must DYOR and navigate the situation cautiously.

The 1-day chart showed that, even after the recent gains, BERA was down 69.64% from the $3.08 high it made in the first week of October. The structure on the 1-day timeframewas starting to turn bullish.

The RSI was above 60 to show strong bullish momentum and the OBV made new highs to reflect the heavy buying pressure recently.

This could continue to drive the rally higher, but holders and traders should consider taking profits.


Final Thoughts

  • The Bera Builds Businesses model showed a turn toward real cash flow, such as internally building apps that generate revenue.
  • The price action was firmly bullish recently, but the controversial Nova refund’s deadline was inching closer.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason behind Berachain's (BERA) recent price rally according to the article?

AThe rally began on January 14th, 2025, after the Berachain end-of-year update introduced the 'Bera Builds Businesses' model, which signaled the foundation's move towards generating cash flow.

QWhat is the 'Nova refund' and why is its February 6th, 2026 deadline a potential threat?

AThe Nova refund is a controversial provision that offered downside protection to an institutional investor (Brevan Howard's Nova fund) for underperforming assets, which is rare in the industry. The approaching deadline makes the timing of the current price rally suspect, as it could trigger significant selling pressure.

QHow much has Berachain's Total Value Locked (TVL) declined from its peak, and what was its value at the time of writing?

AThe TVL had plunged from a peak of $3 billion earlier in 2025 to just $178 million at the time the article was written.

QWhat do the technical indicators (RSI and OBV) suggest about the current market momentum for BERA?

AThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) was above 60, indicating strong bullish momentum. The On-Balance Volume (OBV) made new highs, reflecting heavy recent buying pressure.

QDespite the bullish price action, what cautious advice does the article give to investors?

AThe article advises investors to 'DYOR' (Do Your Own Research) and navigate the situation cautiously. It also suggests that holders and traders should consider taking profits due to the underlying threats like the upcoming refund deadline.

Letture associate

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit11 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit11 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手23 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手23 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit38 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit38 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手41 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手41 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare BERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Berachain (BERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente BerachainBERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Berachain (BERA)Dopo aver acquistato Berachain (BERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Berachain (BERA)Scambia facilmente Berachain (BERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

361 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.02.07Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare BERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BERA BERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片