Banks oppose stablecoin yield deal – Can CLARITY Act find 60 votes?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-24

Introduzione

The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has opposed the latest draft of the CLARITY Act, criticizing its provisions on stablecoin yield and illicit finance. The banking industry sought a total ban on stablecoin yield, but the bill's compromise only prohibits passive yield on idle balances. This opposition has influenced lawmakers, reducing tentative Republican Senate support to potentially 49 votes. With the 60-vote threshold needed, securing sufficient Democratic support appears difficult as some pro-crypto Democrats also oppose the bill due to ethics and illicit finance concerns. Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed doubt the bill can pass before the August recess. Market odds for the bill's passage in 2026 have fallen, leaving its future uncertain.

U.S banking trade group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), has opposed the newly released CLARITY Act draft, flagging gaps on key issues.

In a statement on Thursday, the 23rd of July, the BPI said the bill still has “shortcomings” on stablecoin yield and illicit finance provisions that should be “strengthened.”

Source: X

The banking industry has been opposed to the earlier stablecoin yield compromise that only allowed incentives based on account activity, not idle balances.

This passive yield ban sought to address banks’ capital flight concerns. The compromise is captured in the new draft (Section 404).

Source: U.S Senate

Unfortunately, the banking industry sought a total ban on any form of stablecoin yield or incentive.

Unsurprisingly, the banking sector has lobbied some lawmakers, including Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who now share the banks’ concerns over the crypto bill.

Will the CLARITY Act win the needed 60 votes?

This is bad news for Republicans and the crypto industry.

Before the death of Sen. Lindsey Graham this month, the Republicans had 53 members. Besides, another member, Kentucky’s Senator Mitch McConnell, has been sick for over a month, bringing their headcount to 51.

If Sen. Curtis and Cornyn withhold support for the bill, the Republican support will drop to 49.

In other words, they’ll need 11 Senate Democrats to support the bill to hit the 60-vote threshold. Unfortunately, some pro-crypto Democrats like Sen. Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego have opposed the bill due to inadequate provisions on ethics and illicit finance, among other issues.

This complicates the 60-vote target if a deal isn’t reached to win over all the key holdouts. On top of this, the timing and Majority Leader’s outlook don’t help the bill’s progress.

Only two weeks remain before the Senate breaks for the August recess. Most analysts had warned that if the bill is not passed by August, it will be as good as dead.

For his part, the U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune warned that the bill may fail to pass before the August recess.

I don’t think we’ll be able to get them done. I would like to get at least Clarity started. We’ll see where the votes are.

In response, White House Chief Crypto Advisor Patrick Witt urged Thune to schedule the vote and stop waiting for Democrats.

You’d be waiting forever (for Democrats). Nobody thought that we could actually produce an ethics provision that had real teeth, and that included the President.

For Witt, the new ethics provision addresses Democrats’ concerns.

Source: Polymarket

Market expectations for the bill’s passage in 2026 briefly dropped to 32% on Friday. Whether the passage odds will improve in the next two weeks remains uncertain.


Final Summary

  • Tentative Senate backing for the crypto bill has dropped below 50.
  • Majority Leader John Thune doubted the CLARITY Act’s chance of passage before the August recess

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main concern raised by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) regarding the CLARITY Act draft?

AThe Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has opposed the CLARITY Act draft, citing shortcomings on key issues, particularly regarding stablecoin yield provisions and illicit finance controls, which they believe need to be strengthened. They specifically oppose the compromise that allows incentives based on account activity but bans passive yield on idle balances, seeking a total ban on any form of stablecoin yield or incentive instead.

QHow might Senators Curtis and Cornyn's stance affect the Republican support count for the CLARITY Act?

AIf Senators John Curtis (R-Utah) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) withhold their support for the CLARITY Act, Republican support in the Senate would drop from 51 to 49 votes. This is due to recent events like Senator Lindsey Graham's death and Senator Mitch McConnell's illness, which have already reduced their numbers. With only 49 Republican votes, the bill would need 11 Senate Democrats to reach the 60-vote threshold for passage.

QWhy are some pro-crypto Democrats like Senators Alsobrooks and Gallego opposing the bill?

ASome pro-crypto Democrats, including Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego, are opposing the CLARITY Act due to concerns over inadequate provisions on ethics and illicit finance, among other issues. Their opposition complicates the bill's path to achieving the necessary 60 votes in the Senate.

QWhat did Senate Majority Leader John Thune say about the bill's chances of passing before the August recess?

AU.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed doubt that the CLARITY Act would pass before the August recess, stating, 'I don’t think we’ll be able to get them done. I would like to get at least Clarity started. We’ll see where the votes are.' He highlighted the tight timeline, with only two weeks remaining before the recess.

QHow did the market's expectation for the bill's passage in 2026 change recently, according to the article?

AMarket expectations for the CLARITY Act's passage in 2026 briefly dropped to 32% on the Friday mentioned in the article. This decline reflects the growing uncertainty and political challenges surrounding the bill's progress as key deadlines approach.

Letture associate

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit43 min fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit43 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit47 min fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit47 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit47 min fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit47 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片