Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-31

Introduzione

A high-profile clash between Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon at the World Economic Forum has brought the CLARITY Act into focus. The proposed crypto market structure bill, pending in the Senate, aims to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets and clarify the roles of regulators like the SEC and CFTC. Armstrong withdrew Coinbase’s support, arguing the bill could restrict exchanges from offering yield products for stablecoins and limit consumer choice. In contrast, banking executives advocate for stricter regulations on crypto firms offering deposit-like products. The bill faces partisan tensions as it moves to the Senate Banking Committee. In response, the White House will host a policy meeting with bankers and crypto industry representatives to discuss stablecoin regulation and other key issues, aiming to bridge the divide between traditional finance and the digital asset industry.

A high-profile showdown between Coinbase and major U.S. banks has again brought the CLARITY Act into the limelight. The proposed crypto market structure bill is now pending in the Senate. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, a heated exchange occurred between Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon over the current provisions of the bill. This has highlighted the tension between the traditional financial sector and the rapidly developing digital asset industry.

As per the report from WSJ, the lawmakers are trying to pass the CLARITY Act through Congress, with the Senate Agriculture Committee already voting to approve its part of the bill. The CLARITY Act aims to create a clear and comprehensive national regulatory framework for digital assets by harmonizing their regulation. This also clarifies the role of regulators such as the SEC and CFTC.

Coinbase Pulls Back Support Over Bill Details

Armstrong has stated that Coinbase will not support the CLARITY Act as it is now, as it may limit the ability of exchanges to provide yield products for stablecoins. He stated that the inherent components of the bill may impact the income of the crypto community and the freedom of choice that individuals have.

On the other hand, banking executives such as the CEO of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan, have called for the regulation of companies that provide products similar to deposits. This has emphasized the conflict between digital asset products and financial regulations. During the event, the executives of Wells Fargo and Citigroup were said to have kept their distance from Armstrong.

The CLARITY Act is soon to enter new territory as it progresses towards being considered by the Senate Banking Committee. The first order of business is to secure approval of its part of the legislation before any debate can take place in the Senate. The presence of partisan tensions is further complicating the situation, with Democrats said to be against the legislation during the committee debate on an ethics amendment.

White House Meeting on Stablecoin Policy and Regulation

As a reaction to the recent political turmoil, the White House has established a policy meeting where bankers and representatives of the crypto industry will discuss the CLARITY Act and other regulatory matters. The meeting is likely to focus on stablecoin regulation and will feature questions, with senior policy officials leading the conversation instead of CEOs.

The meeting is likely to pave the way for further discussions in the future on stablecoin yields, market structure, and other regulatory issues in the financial and crypto industry. The disagreement on the CLARITY Act reveals a deep divide between major crypto exchanges and traditional financial institutions on the regulation of digital assets in the U.S. Coinbase’s withdrawal of support for the Act reveals concerns that some of its provisions could stifle innovation in the crypto industry, especially with regard to stablecoin yield products. While bank executives stress compliance and risk management, the upcoming White House policy briefing is a critical point in reconciling disparate industry views and moving the legislative process forward.

Highlighted Crypto News

Ethereum Foundation Enters Period of Mild Austerity, Says Vitalik Buterin

TagsBrian ArmstrongClarity ACTCoinbase

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the CLARITY Act as mentioned in the article?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to create a clear and comprehensive national regulatory framework for digital assets by harmonizing their regulation and clarifying the roles of regulators like the SEC and CFTC.

QWhy has Coinbase withdrawn its support for the current version of the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase withdrew support because the bill may limit the ability of exchanges to provide yield products for stablecoins, potentially impacting crypto community income and individual freedom of choice.

QWhich two CEOs had a heated exchange about the CLARITY Act at the World Economic Forum in Davos?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon had a heated exchange about the bill's provisions.

QWhat is the primary focus of the upcoming White House policy meeting regarding crypto regulation?

AThe meeting is likely to focus on stablecoin regulation and will feature discussions led by senior policy officials.

QHow did banking executives from Wells Fargo and Citigroup reportedly interact with Coinbase's CEO during the event?

AExecutives from Wells Fargo and Citigroup kept their distance from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong during the event.

Letture associate

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit55 min fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit55 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手1 h fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

285 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HOUSE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片