Average Crypto Trader Losses Reached $500 Million Per Day in 2025

RBK-cryptoPubblicato 2025-12-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-25

Introduzione

According to a Coinglass report, the total volume of forced liquidations of margin-based trading positions on crypto exchanges neared $150 billion in 2025. The estimated average daily liquidation volume throughout the year ranged from $400 million to $500 million. A record-breaking single-day liquidation event occurred on October 11, accounting for nearly 15% of the annual total with nearly $20 billion in futures positions liquidated. This was triggered by US President Donald Trump's announcement of new 100% tariffs on Chinese imports and export controls on critical software, which sparked fears of a new trade war and caused a sharp shift towards risk-off sentiment. Bitcoin and Ethereum fell by 10-15% at their peak, while many altcoins crashed by 80% or more. The crash exposed key market vulnerabilities, including reliance on opaque liquidation mechanisms, fragile infrastructure under peak load, and a lack of effective circuit breakers common on traditional exchanges. Unlike the Terra (LUNA) collapse in 2022, this event did not lead to a cascade of institutional investor defaults, as the risks were concentrated in specific strategies and assets rather than being systemic.

In 2025, the total volume of forced liquidations of margin-based trading positions on cryptocurrency exchanges approached $150 billion, according to a Coinglass report. The estimated average daily liquidation rate throughout the year ranged from $400 million to $500 million.

This refers to the nominal value of positions including leverage (a $100 position with 10x leverage counts as $1000 in the total loss amount), but even with this adjustment, the scale of the losses remains impressive.

Nearly 15% of the annual liquidation volume occurred in a single day—on the night of October 11th, when the crypto market experienced the largest cascade of futures position liquidations in history, with a total volume of nearly $20 billion. This set an absolute record for the volume of forcibly closed trading positions on cryptocurrency exchanges.

The event occurred against the backdrop of U.S. President Donald Trump announcing new 100% tariffs on imports from China, as well as export controls on critical software. This sharply increased expectations of a new trade war, as Coinglass writes, which forced markets into a "risk-off" mode, meaning a retreat from high-risk assets, including Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Experts note that the scale of the consequences was determined not only by external factors but also by the structure of the leverage used and the functioning of liquidation mechanisms. During exchange overload, Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanisms were triggered, and trades were executed at unfavorable prices, causing losses even for profitable traders.

Bitcoin and Ethereum lost 10–15% at their peak, while many altcoins collapsed by 80% or more.

The Coinglass report stated that the crash of that day revealed key market vulnerabilities: reliance on opaque liquidation mechanisms, the fragility of infrastructure under peak loads, and the lack of effective circuit breakers that exist on traditional exchanges.

Unlike the crash of the Terra (LUNA) project in 2022, this collapse did not lead to a series of defaults by institutional investors. The risks were not systemic and were concentrated in specific strategies and assets, noted Coinglass.

How the Base Blockchain Ecosystem is Structured. Top 5 Applications

AI Outperformed Humans in a Crypto Trading Tournament. What Were the Results

Miner "Capitulation" Called a Bullish Factor for Bitcoin. Why

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the average daily liquidation amount for crypto traders in 2025 according to the Coinglass report?

AThe average daily liquidation amount ranged from $400 million to $500 million in 2025.

QWhat event on October 11 triggered the largest cascade of futures liquidations in crypto market history?

AUS President Donald Trump announced new 100% tariffs on imports from China and export controls on critical software, which sharply increased expectations of a new trade war.

QWhat were the maximum losses for Bitcoin and Ethereum during the market crash described in the article?

ABitcoin and Ethereum lost 10-15% at their maximum, while many altcoins collapsed by 80% or more.

QWhat key market vulnerabilities were exposed by the crash according to the Coinglass report?

AThe key vulnerabilities were dependence on opaque liquidation mechanisms, infrastructure fragility during peak loads, and the lack of effective circuit breakers that exist on traditional exchanges.

QHow did this market crash differ from the Terra (LUNA) collapse in 2022 in terms of institutional impact?

AUnlike the Terra collapse, this crash did not lead to a series of defaults by institutional investors. The risks were not systemic and were concentrated in specific strategies and assets.

Letture associate

BitMine adds 7,430 ETH, spends $86M on share buybacks – Why?

BitMine significantly slowed its Ethereum accumulation last week, purchasing only 7,430 ETH—its smallest weekly buy since May. The company instead prioritized shareholder returns, spending approximately $86 million to repurchase 5.5 million common shares. BitMine's ETH treasury remains substantial at 5.78 million ETH (4.8% of circulating supply), nearing its long-term goal of 5%. The company has already staked 85% of its holdings and projects up to $290 million in annual staking revenue. Meanwhile, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy continues its Bitcoin-focused treasury strategy despite recent sales.

ambcrypto18 min fa

BitMine adds 7,430 ETH, spends $86M on share buybacks – Why?

ambcrypto18 min fa

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

Evergreen Technology's IPO subscription results are now available. On July 20, the domestic memory chip giant announced the offline preliminary allotment results and online lottery results for its IPO. A total of approximately 9.43 million retail investors participated in the online subscription, generating 770,000 winning lots with a final winning rate of about 0.4714%, setting a record for new shares on the STAR Market. After triggering a clawback mechanism from institutional to retail investors, the online retail allocation was significantly increased to 3.851 billion shares. Simultaneously, 285 institutional investors participated in the offline subscription, ultimately receiving 2.173 billion shares at an allotment rate of approximately 0.1756%. Leading insurers and public funds were among the major recipients. Notably, Liang Wenfeng, founder of the major AI model company DeepSeek, through his quantitative investment firms Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative and Zhejiang Jiuzhang Asset, secured the largest share among private funds, with a total allotment worth approximately 175 million yuan. Estimates suggest potential profits could reach 730 million yuan if Evergreen Technology's market capitalization reaches 3 trillion yuan post-listing. The company is expected to list on July 27 and could become the highest-valued tech stock on the A-share market, with various brokerages providing valuations ranging from 1 trillion to over 4 trillion yuan. However, recent significant corrections in global tech stocks may impact its post-listing performance. (Character count: 1,196)

marsbit44 min fa

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

marsbit44 min fa

USCR crypto stabilizes at $0.0022: Can the memecoin reverse Q2 losses?

The memecoin USCR, which tracks sentiment around a potential U.S. Bitcoin reserve, has stabilized at $0.0022 after a 37% drop in June erased its May gains. A recovery above key moving averages could target $0.0028 and potentially $0.0036, representing a 30-60% upside. However, its price is heavily tied to the progress of a bill to establish a formal U.S. BTC reserve. That bill has stalled in Congress, and prediction markets now price only an 18% chance of a reserve being established before 2027. Despite this uncertainty, holder numbers remain relatively strong at 48K. The coin's recovery is contingent on positive developments regarding the reserve legislation.

ambcrypto1 h fa

USCR crypto stabilizes at $0.0022: Can the memecoin reverse Q2 losses?

ambcrypto1 h fa

3 Million-Follower Goddess Fully AI-Synthesized, Fake Orphanage, Cross-Border ‘Fake Charity’ Collapses Overnight

An Australian influencer named Lily Jay, with nearly 3 million Instagram followers, is at the centre of a major AI-fueled charity scam. Her 'Lily Jay Foundation' claimed to build orphanages, mosques, and deliver aid in places like Uganda and Gaza, using emotionally powerful videos of herself with children. However, an investigation by ABC NEWS Verify revealed these scenes—including a key video announcing an orphanage's opening—were entirely AI-generated, complete with telltale flaws like garbled text on clothing. The foundation's 'humanitarian award' was also faked using AI images. The foundation admitted in small print on its website that it is not a registered charity, avoiding financial transparency laws. While based in Kosovo, its operations and the influencer's lavish personal lifestyle raised further red flags. Following media inquiries, the foundation selectively hid donation buttons and removed fraudulent content for Australian visitors, but kept them active internationally. Experts warn this case is a textbook example of how AI can be weaponized to exploit public trust and generosity, creating believable but entirely fabricated narratives of aid. The incident highlights the growing danger of deepfakes in eroding trust within the charitable sector, urging donors to critically verify causes before giving.

marsbit1 h fa

3 Million-Follower Goddess Fully AI-Synthesized, Fake Orphanage, Cross-Border ‘Fake Charity’ Collapses Overnight

marsbit1 h fa

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbit1 h fa

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot