Arthur Hayes argues new Fed liquidity tool “RMP” masks renewed money printing

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-19

Introduzione

Arthur Hayes, former BitMEX CEO, argues the Federal Reserve's new "Reserve Management Purchases" (RMP) program is effectively a disguised form of quantitative easing (QE). He claims that by purchasing short-term Treasury bills and managing liquidity, the Fed is financing government spending while avoiding the political stigma of QE. Hayes warns this is highly inflationary and erodes the purchasing power of ordinary citizens, while benefiting holders of scarce assets like Bitcoin, gold, and silver. The article notes the Fed recently cut rates and announced $40 billion in short-term Treasury purchases, which Chair Jerome Powell framed as a technical adjustment. However, analysts suggest mixed signals may dampen a sustained Bitcoin rally. Polymarket data indicates a high probability of no further rate cuts in January.

Arthur Hayes, co-founder and former CEO of crypto exchange BitMEX, argued in a Substack essay published Friday that the Federal Reserve’s new “reserve management purchases” (RMP) program is effectively a rebranded form of quantitative easing.

Hayes argues that by buying short-term Treasury bills and recycling liquidity through money markets, the Fed is effectively financing government spending while avoiding the political stigma of quantitative easing, even as officials frame the program as a technical liquidity operation.

“The RMP is a thinly disguised way for the Fed to cash the government’s checks. This is highly inflationary from both a financial and real goods/services perspective,” he wrote.
US Treasury issuance by maturity. Source: MacroMicro

Hayes said policies like RMP expand fiat liquidity and, in his view, favor scarce assets such as Bitcoin, gold and silver.

I love QE because it means money printing, and thankfully I own financial assets like gold, gold/silver mining stocks, and Bitcoin that rise faster than the pace of fiat money creation.

At the same time, he warned that people without assets are harmed, as money creation erodes purchasing power, weakens wages relative to prices and shifts wealth toward asset holders.

“Unfortunately, in the here and now for most of humanity, money printing destroys their dignity as productive humans,” he wrote. “When the government intentionally debases the currency, it destroys the link between energy inputs and economic outputs.”

Related: Bitcoin rebounds on Japan rate hike as Arthur Hayes sees dollar at 200 yen

Polymarket points to pause after December rate cut

On Dec. 10, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) cut interest rates by 25 basis points and announced purchases of short-term Treasury securities, a move Fed Chair Jerome Powell said was “solely for the purpose of maintaining an ample supply of reserves” and separate from the stance of monetary policy.

The Fed said the purchases would initially total about $40 billion in the first month and could remain elevated for several months to ease near-term pressures in money markets, particularly around seasonal fluctuations such as tax payments.

Despite the interest rate cut and the announcement of short-term Treasury purchases, analysts said mixed signals from Powell were likely to dampen a sustained Bitcoin rally until the rate-cutting cycle resumes in 2026.

The price of Bitcoin was about $92,695 on Dec. 10, according to Yahoo Finance data. It is was trading around $87,300 at time of writing.

At the time of writing, Polymarket traders were overwhelmingly pricing in no change to Fed policy in January, with the probability of rates staying unchanged at about 77%, while odds of another 25 basis point cut sit near 21% and larger moves are viewed as highly unlikely.

Odds of Fed rate cut in Jan. Source: Polymarket

Powell’s term is set to expire in May 2026. US President Donald Trump, who has publicly pushed for the next Fed chair to pursue aggressive interest rate cuts, is preparing to interview finalists to succeed him, with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett widely viewed as the frontrunner.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Arthur Hayes' main argument regarding the Federal Reserve's new RMP program?

AArthur Hayes argues that the Fed's Reserve Management Purchases (RMP) program is effectively a rebranded form of quantitative easing (QE) that allows the Fed to finance government spending while avoiding the political stigma associated with QE.

QAccording to Hayes, what is the inflationary impact of the RMP program?

AHayes states that the RMP is 'highly inflationary from both a financial and real goods/services perspective' because it expands fiat liquidity.

QWhich assets does Hayes believe benefit from policies like RMP and QE?

AHayes believes that scarce assets such as Bitcoin, gold, and silver mining stocks benefit from these policies, as they tend to rise faster than the pace of fiat money creation.

QWhat was the Fed's stated reason for initiating the purchases of short-term Treasury securities?

AFed Chair Jerome Powell stated that the purchases were 'solely for the purpose of maintaining an ample supply of reserves' and were a technical liquidity operation, separate from the stance of monetary policy.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the Fed's January policy meeting, according to Polymarket data?

AAccording to Polymarket, traders are pricing in a 77% probability of no change to interest rates in January, with only a 21% chance of another 25 basis point cut.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit29 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit29 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit48 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit48 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit57 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit57 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片