Arizona Warns of Crypto ATM Scams After $177M in Losses

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-03

Introduzione

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes issued a statewide warning about the rising threat of crypto ATM scams, which cost residents over $177 million in losses in 2024. The FBI reported a 99% increase in such complaints nationwide, totaling more than $246 million. Scammers typically contact victims via phone or text, posing as banks, law enforcement, or relatives, and convince them to deposit cash into one of Arizona’s 600 crypto ATMs—after which funds are irrecoverable. In response, Arizona implemented the Crypto Kiosk Licence Fraud Prevention law, capping daily transactions at $2,000 for new users and $10,500 for existing ones. Operators must now refund victims who file a police report within 30 days. The state has also placed physical "STOP" signs on Bitcoin ATMs and collaborated with law enforcement to raise awareness. Legal actions are expanding beyond Arizona, with Washington D.C.’s Attorney General suing Athena Bitcoin after finding that 93% of its deposits in the first five months were scam-related, often targeting elderly victims.

The Attorney General of Arizona, Kris Mayes, issued a statewide warning on January 2, alerting natives that crypto ATM fraud has become an increasing threat after Arizonans lost more than $177 million to these schemes in 2024.

At the same time, her office rolled out a new fraud complaint form, permitting victims to note losses within 30 days of being scammed. The alert comes as a wide clampdown on crypto kiosk fraud increases over the US and beyond, with the FBI noting a 99% increase in complaints and more than $246 million in losses in 2024.

From having lawsuits against prominent operators to extensive federal legislation, the industry is under fire as policymakers race to safeguard vulnerable consumers. Scammers normally reach victims via unsolicited calls or texts, imitating banks, law enforcement, or loved ones before influencing them to deposit cash into one of Arizona’s 600 crypto ATMs.

Once funds are deposited into a kiosk, it is not possible to recover them. Scottsdale police have solely reported around $5 million in losses in 2026. Arizona has also collaborated with Yavapai County Sheriff David Rhodes to position physical “STOP” signs on Bitcoin ATMs all over the state.

The Increased Cases

After warnings, Arizona’s Crypto Kiosk Licence Fraud Prevention law, efficient since September 2025, caps daily transactions at $2,000 for new customers and $10,500 for current users.

Operators must now provide complete refunds to fraud victims who file a police report within one month. At that time, Governor Hobbs also signed HB 2749 to make a state BTC reserve funded completely by unclaimed digital assets.

As Arizona makes consumer safeguards tighter, legal battles are escalating elsewhere against some of the sector’s largest players. The Attorney General of Washington, D.C., Brian Schwalb, sued Athena Bitcoin after a probe unveiled that 93% of the firm’s deposits at the time of its first five months in the district were directly associated with scams, with a median victim age of 71, and that one resident lost $98,000 over 19 transactions.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Whale Wallet Withdraws ETH, Analysts Explain the Game Around Ethereum Tokens on Current Situation

TagsATMCrypto ScamScam

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the total amount of money lost to crypto ATM scams in Arizona in 2024, according to the Attorney General?

AArizonans lost more than $177 million to crypto ATM scams in 2024.

QWhat new measure did the Arizona Attorney General's office introduce to help victims of these scams?

AThe office rolled out a new fraud complaint form, permitting victims to note losses within 30 days of being scammed.

QWhat is the daily transaction cap for new customers under Arizona's Crypto Kiosk Licence Fraud Prevention law?

AThe law caps daily transactions at $2,000 for new customers.

QWhich company was sued by the Attorney General of Washington, D.C., and what percentage of its deposits were linked to scams?

AThe Attorney General of Washington, D.C., sued Athena Bitcoin after a probe unveiled that 93% of the firm's deposits were directly associated with scams.

QWhat physical warning measure has Arizona collaborated on to place on Bitcoin ATMs throughout the state?

AArizona has collaborated with Yavapai County Sheriff David Rhodes to position physical 'STOP' signs on Bitcoin ATMs all over the state.

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit58 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit58 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手58 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手58 min fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ATM

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Atletico De Madrid Fan Token (ATM) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Atletico De Madrid Fan TokenATM.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Atletico De Madrid Fan Token (ATM)Dopo aver acquistato Atletico De Madrid Fan Token (ATM), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Atletico De Madrid Fan Token (ATM)Scambia facilmente Atletico De Madrid Fan Token (ATM) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

161 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare ATM

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ATM ATM sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片