Argentina Bans Polymarket Over Illegal Gambling Concerns Following Colombia

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-17

Introduzione

Argentina has blocked the prediction market platform Polymarket following a court ruling in Buenos Aires that declared its operations illegal under the country's gambling regulations. Authorities have directed internet service providers and app stores to restrict access to the platform. Officials raised concerns over the use of cryptocurrencies for betting and the lack of user identity checks, which could allow minors to participate. The decision follows similar action taken by Colombia, where Polymarket was also classified as an illegal gambling operation for failing to meet licensing requirements. The case reflects growing global regulatory scrutiny of crypto-based prediction markets, which are increasingly being treated as gambling platforms due to their structure and potential risks to market integrity.

Argentina’s authorities have blocked Polymarket across the country after a ruling by a Buenos Aires court. It declared that it operated illegally and outside the country’s legal framework and regulations regarding gambling. The country’s authorities have asked ENACOM to impose a blockade against Polymarket by internet service providers. The limited access to mobile applications across the country. They have also asked app stores to remove Polymarket applications to prevent users from accessing them.

It was also determined that the platform enabled users to place bets using cryptocurrencies. And the traditional forms of payment in an easy manner. There were also concerns raised by officials regarding the lack of verification measures for the identity of users. This may lead minors to indulge in illegal betting activities. Complaints from local gambling organizations prompted legal action against the platform’s operations.

Regulatory Concerns and Regional Crackdown Expand

Investigations were conducted regarding suspicious trading activities related to inflation prediction markets. This have recently received significant regulatory interest from financial oversight organizations. Reports have been received about unusual betting patterns that have sparked concerns about a potential case. The officials have studied the trading and have observed that some behaviors may have suggested a potential information advantage for some groups in the entire system. This may have compromised the overall integrity and transparency in the current decentralized prediction markets operating globally.

It is worth noting that the authorities concluded that the platform operated like an online betting system. The authorities noted that prediction markets generally take a similar form to gambling structures, in which users of the platforms make predictions about real-world events in order to obtain financial rewards. The classification of prediction markets as gambling structures increases the need for stricter regulation and enforcement of the existing gambling laws.

Argentina’s decision comes in the wake of a similar decision made by the Colombian authorities, banning Polymarket from operating within their jurisdiction since it did not comply with the licensing requirements. The Colombian authorities classified the prediction platform as an illegal gambling platform and asked all the internet service providers within the country to block the platform immediately. The case is a testament to the increasing global scrutiny of crypto-based platforms that take a similar form to gambling and trading mechanisms.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Polymarket Users Threaten Journalist Over Iran Missile Report Dispute

TagsArgentinaBlockchainCRYPTO GAMBLINGCryptocurrencyexchangegamblingPolymarket

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did Argentina block Polymarket?

AArgentina blocked Polymarket because a Buenos Aires court ruled that it operated illegally outside the country's legal gambling framework and regulations.

QWhat actions did Argentine authorities take against Polymarket?

AAuthorities asked ENACOM to impose an ISP blockade, restricted access to its applications, and requested app stores to remove Polymarket's apps.

QWhat were the specific concerns officials had about Polymarket platform?

AOfficials raised concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies for betting, lack of user identity verification, and the risk of minors engaging in illegal betting activities.

QHow did Argentina classify Polymarket's operations?

AArgentina classified Polymarket as an online betting system, noting that prediction markets function similarly to gambling structures where users predict real-world events for financial rewards.

QWhich other country recently took similar action against Polymarket?

AColombia recently banned Polymarket for operating without complying with licensing requirements, classifying it as an illegal gambling platform.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit10 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit10 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit11 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit11 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit12 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit12 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片