Aptos unveils deflationary tokenomics shift as APT price slides

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-18

Introduzione

Aptos has announced a major overhaul of its tokenomics, shifting from an inflationary model to a deflationary, performance-driven framework. This change aims to reduce long-term token supply as network activity increases. The update comes as APT trades near $0.88, continuing a broader downtrend. Key changes include cutting annual staking rewards from 5.19% to 2.6%, introducing a hard supply cap of 2.1 billion APT (with 1.196B currently circulating), and permanently locking 210 million APT (18% of current supply) for staking. A major reduction in token unlocks (roughly 60%) is also expected by October 2026. Despite these significant structural shifts designed to tighten supply, the market reaction has been muted, with price action remaining weak as traders focus on broader risk conditions rather than long-term tokenomics narratives.

Aptos has outlined a sweeping overhaul of its tokenomics model. It pivots away from inflation-heavy bootstrap incentives toward a performance-driven framework designed to reduce long-term supply as network activity scales.

The update comes as APT trades near $0.88, down roughly 4.5% on the day. Price action continues a broader downtrend that has seen the token lose more than half its value from late-2025 highs.

While the immediate market reaction has been muted, the proposal signals a structural shift in how Aptos intends to fund validators, reward usage, and manage emissions over the coming years.

From bootstrap inflation to performance-driven supply

Aptos launched mainnet in October 2022 with a subsidy-heavy emissions model designed to bootstrap infrastructure and validator participation. According to the foundation, that phase is now ending.

The network is now transitioning towards supporting institutional-grade, high-throughput applications.

As of today, 1.196 billion APT are in circulation. A major inflection point is approaching in October 2026, when the four-year unlock cycle for early investors and core contributors concludes. Annual supply unlocks will be cut by roughly 60%.

Foundation grant distributions are also set to decline by more than 50% year over year between 2026 and 2027.

The proposed reforms aim to formalize this transition rather than rely on unlock schedules alone.

Aptos staking rewards cut, long-term commitments incentivized

Central to the proposal is a plan to reduce annual staking rewards from 5.19% to 2.6%, nearly halving ongoing emissions. The foundation says it will also explore a redesigned staking framework.

The new framework rewards longer lock-up periods with relatively higher yields while keeping total rewards within the reduced-emissions envelope.

Validator operating costs are expected to fall alongside these changes through upgrades outlined in AIP-139.

Hard supply cap and permanent foundation lock

For the first time, Aptos plans to introduce a protocol-level hard cap of 2.1 billion APT, beyond which no new tokens can ever be minted.

With 1.196 billion APT currently in circulation, this leaves 904 million APT—about 43% of the total cap—available for future staking rewards over time.

In parallel, the foundation will permanently lock and stake 210 million APT, roughly 18% of today’s circulating supply.

These tokens will never be sold or redistributed, effectively removing them from liquid supply while continuing to support network security through staking.

Market reaction remains cautious

Despite the scale of the proposed changes, APT’s price has continued to slide, with charts showing persistent lower highs and weak momentum into mid-February.

Trading data suggests the market is currently prioritizing broader risk conditions over long-term tokenomics narratives, at least in the near term.

That said, the foundation positions the update as a long-duration shift rather than a catalyst for immediate price action.


Final Summary

  • Aptos is shifting from bootstrap inflation to performance-linked supply mechanics.
  • APT price weakness suggests the market has yet to price in long-term supply tightening.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main change Aptos is making to its tokenomics model?

AAptos is shifting from an inflation-heavy bootstrap model to a performance-driven framework designed to reduce the long-term token supply as network activity increases.

QWhat is the new hard supply cap for APT tokens and how many are currently in circulation?

AThe new hard supply cap is 2.1 billion APT. Currently, 1.196 billion APT are in circulation.

QHow much are the annual staking rewards being reduced by in the new proposal?

AAnnual staking rewards are being reduced from 5.19% to 2.6%, which nearly halves the ongoing emissions.

QWhat significant event is happening in October 2026 that will affect APT's supply?

AIn October 2026, the four-year unlock cycle for early investors and core contributors concludes, which will cut annual supply unlocks by roughly 60%.

QHow is the Aptos Foundation contributing to the new deflationary model with its own token holdings?

AThe foundation will permanently lock and stake 210 million APT (about 18% of the current circulating supply). These tokens will never be sold, effectively removing them from the liquid supply while still supporting network security.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报36 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报36 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News54 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News54 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片