All about Tether’s $150M bet on digital gold and what it means

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-06

Introduzione

Tether, the issuer of the dominant stablecoin USDT, is aggressively expanding into the tokenized gold market. Its recent $150 million investment in Gold.com—acquiring a 12% stake—is part of a broader strategy to replicate its stablecoin success with its gold-backed token, XAU₮. The deal includes Gold.com promoting Tether’s stablecoins and investing $20 million in XAU₮. This follows Tether’s pattern of strategic investments, including $100 million in a gold royalties firm and $200 million in financial services platform Antalpha. Tether has also become a major physical gold buyer, acquiring 27 tons in Q4 2025 alone. Despite XAU₮'s market cap nearing $3 billion, it faces strong competition from Paxos Gold (PAXG), which now holds 42% market share compared to Tether’s 47%. Tether’s leadership aims to position the company as a leading “gold central bank,” capitalizing on declining trust in fiat systems.

After sealing its lead on stablecoins, Tether, issuer of the world’s largest on-chain dollar, USDT, is now betting on similar success through tokenized gold.

The firm recently announced a $150 million investment in Gold.com, a well-known platform for the physical retail gold and precious metals market. This highlighted Tether’s broader strategy to scale and replicate its stablecoin-like moat in the physical gold sector.

The deal will let Tether own 3.37 million common shares of Gold.com, or about 12% of the total shares. The deal will also grant it the right to elect a board member on the platform.

According to a statement, the investment will help Gold.com lease some of Tether’s gold facilities.

In return, the platform will invest $20 million in Tether’s tokenized gold, XAUT, and promote its dollar-based stablecoin offerings (USDT and USAT).

“The collaboration is expected to enhance the credibility and distribution of Tether’s gold-backed XAU₮ stablecoin, expand Gold.com’s retail and digital offerings, introduce gold leasing solutions, and drive increased consumer and institutional engagement across both platforms.”

Tether’s bet on digital gold rush

For the unfamiliar, a similar distribution-led strategy was used by the firm to scale USDT into a global dominant player in the USD-denominated stablecoin market.

USDT began on the Bitfinex exchange, which is owned by the same parent firm as Tether. Soon, USDT was listed on Binance, Kraken, Coinbase, and others, eventually becoming the foundation of global crypto liquidity.

Tether is using this tested plan for XAUT, its tokenized gold. In June 2025, the firm invested $100 million in Elemental Altus Royalties, a Canadian-based outlet focusing on gold-linked royalties.

Similarly, in October 2025, it poured $200 million into Antalpha, a financial services platform, to advance custody, lending, and infrastructure for tokenised gold.

To cap it all off, Tether has become the top private gold buyer in 2025, acquiring 27 tons of physical gold in Q4 alone. Interestingly, the firm has also been investing in gold-related media houses, according to a research firm.

All roads lead to XAUT for now. Reacting to the Gold.com investment, Juan Sartori, Head of Special Projects at Tether, said,

“We are strengthening XAU₮’s transparency, scalability, and its ability to move seamlessly between physical and digital markets.”

In fact, even the firm’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, hasn’t shied away from their aggressive gold strategy. He recently told Bloomberg,

“We are soon becoming basically one of the biggest, let’s say, gold central banks in the world.”

Ardoino framed the move as long-term positioning amid weakening trust in the fiat-based monetary system.

Tokenized gold wars – Will Tether lose to Paxos?

XAUT’s market cap rose sharply in late 2025 and early 2026 as gold printed new highs.

However, the gold market’s recent cool-off dragged it below $3 billion and Paxos’s PAX Gold [PAXG] has been aggressively pushing to become a dominant player. At press time, it had a 42% market share compared to Tether’s 47%.

Final Thoughts

Tether’s $150 million investment and recent gold bets mirror early USDT’s scaling strategy.
Paxos Gold’s market share has surged though, threatening to dethrone Tether in the tokenized gold market.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of Tether's $150 million investment in Gold.com?

AThe investment aims to help Tether scale and replicate its stablecoin-like success in the physical gold sector, enhance the credibility and distribution of its gold-backed XAU₮ stablecoin, expand Gold.com's retail and digital offerings, introduce gold leasing solutions, and drive increased consumer and institutional engagement.

QHow much of Gold.com's shares will Tether own after the investment?

ATether will own 3.37 million common shares of Gold.com, representing approximately 12% of the total shares.

QWhat strategy is Tether using to scale its tokenized gold XAUT, and how did it previously use a similar approach?

ATether is using a distribution-led strategy to scale XAUT, similar to how it scaled USDT into a dominant player in the USD-denominated stablecoin market by initially launching on Bitfinex and then listing on major exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase.

QAccording to the article, what did Tether's CEO Paolo Ardoino say about the company's gold strategy?

APaolo Ardoino stated that Tether is soon becoming 'one of the biggest, let's say, gold central banks in the world,' framing the move as long-term positioning amid weakening trust in the fiat-based monetary system.

QHow does Paxos Gold (PAXG) compare to Tether's XAUT in terms of market share in the tokenized gold market?

AAt press time, Paxos's PAX Gold had a 42% market share compared to Tether's XAUT, which had 47%, indicating strong competition and a threat to Tether's dominance in the tokenized gold market.

Letture associate

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist7 min fa

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist7 min fa

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit7 min fa

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit7 min fa

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit12 min fa

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit12 min fa

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit57 min fa

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit57 min fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 h fa

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot