AAVE drops 10% – Assessing if $1 trillion in loans can spark rebound

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-25

Introduzione

AAVE's price dropped nearly 10% by January 25th, extending its pullback toward the mid-$150s. Despite the decline, selling pressure remained measured, with RSI neutral and MACD showing a weakening bearish trend. Open Interest held steady around $130 million, and Funding Rates stayed positive, indicating traders are not rushing to exit and long positions still dominate. The network is approaching a major milestone of $1 trillion in cumulative loans issued, reflecting frequent liquidity reuse through features like flash loans and multi-chain expansion rather than simple capital inflows. This demonstrates strong on-chain credit demand, reaching volumes comparable to large U.S. banks.

Aave was down nearly 10% the week at 25th of January, but the market response hasn’t been quite as dramatic. Open Interest [OI] is steady and Funding Rates are still positive, so traders are in no rush to exit.

On the other hand, the network is approaching a major milestone in total loans issued – this disconnect is worth a closer look.

AAVE slips, but selling pressure is measured

AAVE extended its pullback from the $170-$175 zone and drifted toward the mid-$150s. Price action showed a series of lower closes, but the decline hadn’t yet turned aggressive. RSI was neutral, so the pace was quite weak.

MACD remained in negative territory, so there was a short-term bearish trend. However, the histogram had started to go flat, so the downtrend isn’t quite as strong as we think.

Volume profile data also showed strong activity at the time of writing, so buyers were still present.

Derivatives numbers look steady

Over the past week, Aave’s [AAVE] Aggregated Open Interest [OI] was largely stable around the $130 million mark; traders haven’t rushed to close their positions despite the pullback.

Funding Rates also stayed positive for most of the period. Long positions were dominating, with traders willing to pay a premium to stay exposed.

Importantly, there was no spike or collapse in either metric, so no one’s panicking yet.

The big picture

The protocol is now closing in on $1 trillion in cumulative loans originated. This milestone is indicative of how frequently its liquidity is reused, rather than by simple capital inflows.

Features like flash loans, more efficient borrowing tools, and expansion across multiple chains have let the same pool of funds to power trade, arbitrage, and liquidate repeatedly. Over time, the demand for on-chain credit has pushed loan volumes to levels comparable with large U.S. banks.


Final Thoughts

  • AAVE’s price may be down 10%, but traders are still optimistic.
  • The network is nearing $1 trillion in loans issued!

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage drop in AAVE's price as of January 25th, and what was the general market response to this decline?

AAAVE was down nearly 10% as of January 25th. The market response wasn't dramatic, as Open Interest remained steady and Funding Rates stayed positive, indicating traders were not rushing to exit.

QWhat two key derivative metrics suggested that traders were not panicking and remained optimistic about AAVE?

AThe two key metrics were Aggregated Open Interest (OI), which was stable around $130 million, and positive Funding Rates, which indicated that long positions were dominant.

QWhat major milestone is the AAVE network approaching, and what does this figure represent?

AThe AAVE network is approaching $1 trillion in cumulative loans originated. This figure represents how frequently its liquidity is reused through features like flash loans, rather than just from simple capital inflows.

QAccording to the RSI and MACD indicators, what was the nature of the short-term price trend for AAVE?

AThe RSI was neutral, suggesting a weak pace of decline. The MACD was in negative territory, confirming a short-term bearish trend, but its histogram was flattening, indicating the downtrend was not very strong.

QWhat specific AAVE features were cited as reasons for the efficient reuse of its liquidity pools?

AThe features cited were flash loans, more efficient borrowing tools, and expansion across multiple chains, which allow the same pool of funds to be used repeatedly for trade, arbitrage, and liquidations.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报37 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News55 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News55 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare AAVE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Aave Protocol (AAVE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Aave ProtocolAAVE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Aave Protocol (AAVE)Dopo aver acquistato Aave Protocol (AAVE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Aave Protocol (AAVE)Scambia facilmente Aave Protocol (AAVE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

347 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare AAVE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di AAVE AAVE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片