a16z Crypto Founder on Stablecoins: The 'WhatsApp Moment' in Money Has Arrived

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-15

Introduzione

Chris Dixon, general partner at a16z Crypto, argues that stablecoins are bringing about a "WhatsApp moment" for money—dramatically reducing the cost and increasing the speed of global payments, much like messaging apps did for communication. Last year, stablecoin transaction volume reached over $12 trillion, nearing Visa’s $17 trillion, but at a fraction of the cost. Stablecoins, which are pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, are becoming mainstream for online and international payments. They offer near-instant settlement, high reliability, and programmability, effectively turning money into software. While adoption is still largely within crypto-native and global business contexts, integration with traditional finance is accelerating. U.S. policy developments, such as the proposed Clarity Act, could provide the regulatory framework needed for stablecoins to scale as part of global financial infrastructure. Major companies like Stripe, Fidelity, and SpaceX are already using or issuing stablecoins to cut costs, streamline cross-border payroll, and operate in regions with weak banking systems. A significant secondary effect is the strengthening of the U.S. dollar’s dominance. Stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether now hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, making them top holders. If growth continues, they could rank among the top 10 Treasury holders by next year. Ultimately, stablecoins are reshaping global finance by enabling borderless value tr...

Article Author: Chris Dixon

Article Translation: Block Unicorn

Chris Dixon is a General Partner at a16z, leading its crypto investment division

The internet globalized information, and cryptocurrency is having a similar effect on money. Although recent headlines may focus on Bitcoin's price, a deeper and more lasting transformation is underway in the digital payments space. This year, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the US dollar—are gradually becoming a mainstream choice for online and international payments.

Call it the "WhatsApp moment" for money. Just as messaging apps like WhatsApp reduced the cost of international texting from around 30 cents per message to zero, stablecoins are doing the same for financial transactions. The data confirms this: last year, after excluding bot and other non-rational trading, stablecoin transaction volume exceeded $12 trillion—approaching Visa's $17 trillion in volume for the same period, but at a much lower cost.

In the process, stablecoins are bringing the original open and interoperable vision of the internet to finance. Given that blockchain technology allows stablecoins to be programmed, money is effectively becoming software.

While most stablecoin transactions currently come from "crypto-native" and global commercial activities rather than everyday consumer spending, this is changing. As more improvements are introduced, such as integration with more traditional financial partners to make user transactions easier, mass adoption of stablecoins will follow.

People around the world using stablecoins for transactions will hardly notice they are using stablecoins. Most will think they are simply using US dollars. And that is indeed the case, as the distinction between stablecoins and dollars has become very abstract for end users. Since each token is backed by one dollar or equivalent assets, the name itself doesn't matter. What matters is that the product is more reliable than any previous payment technology, almost free, and settles much faster—almost instantly.

Stablecoins also demonstrate the infinite possibilities when policy and technology align. Last year's "Genius Act" established clear rules for US stablecoins. More importantly, Congress is currently reviewing the "Clarity Act," which aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins. The Clarity Act will help determine whether these networks can scale to become part of global financial infrastructure or will stagnate. When challengers are given a level playing field and space to innovate, markets work their magic. It was this magic that enabled the internet to triumph over incumbents; it was this magic that allowed the US to dominate the internet; and it is this magic that will enable stablecoins to surpass today's payment systems.

Businesses are already recognizing the advantages of stablecoins. Some of the world's largest tech companies, banks, and retailers are actively promoting the use of stablecoins, or, like Fidelity Investments, have already issued their own. Payment giant Stripe has acquired several cryptocurrency companies over the past year or so and now supports stablecoins at checkout, instantly reducing payment processing fees from about 3% to 1.5%, with plenty of room for further reduction. SpaceX uses stablecoins to move funds from countries like Argentina and Nigeria, where local banking systems are fragile or capital controls are strict. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees faster. Ultimately, the internet could transform into an open marketplace where machine-to-machine transactions thrive, and AI agents conduct trades and settlements on behalf of users in real time.

The adoption of stablecoins also has an often-underestimated second-order effect: these tokens solidify the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world, thereby creating strong new demand for US Treasury bonds. Leading stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether currently hold nearly $140 billion in short-term US government bonds directly, making them among the top 20 holders of US Treasuries today. If stablecoin adoption continues to grow at its current rate, their holdings could jump into the top 10 by next year. (Citi Research even predicts that by 2030, stablecoin holdings of US Treasuries could surpass those of foreign governments and commercial banks.)

This is not just about payments; it's about reshaping the global financial landscape. The internet gave us borderless communication; stablecoins give us borderless value transfer. With clear rules and a sound market structure, they can become the pipes and pillars of a new financial system.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat does Chris Dixon refer to as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money, and why?

AChris Dixon refers to the rise of stablecoins as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money because, similar to how WhatsApp reduced the cost of international messaging to nearly zero, stablecoins are drastically reducing the cost of financial transactions, making them cheaper, faster, and more accessible for online and international payments.

QHow does the transaction volume of stablecoins compare to Visa, and what is a key advantage of stablecoins mentioned?

ALast year, stablecoins processed over $12 trillion in transactions (excluding non-rational trades like bots), which is approaching Visa's $17 trillion volume. A key advantage is that stablecoin transactions are significantly cheaper and settle almost instantly.

QWhat two U.S. legislative acts are mentioned in relation to stablecoins, and what is their purpose?

AThe two acts are the 'Genius Act' and the 'Clarity Act'. The Genius Act established clear rules for stablecoins in the U.S., while the Clarity Act, currently under consideration, aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins to determine if they can scale as part of global financial infrastructure.

QHow do stablecoins benefit the U.S. Treasury and its global financial standing, according to the article?

AStablecoins consolidate the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world by creating strong new demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. Leading issuers like Circle and Tether hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. government bonds, making them top-20 holders. This demand is projected to grow, potentially making them a top-10 holder by next year.

QName two specific ways companies are already leveraging stablecoins for business operations.

A1. Companies like SpaceX use stablecoins to move funds from countries with fragile banking systems or strict capital controls (e.g., Argentina, Nigeria). 2. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees more quickly. Additionally, Stripe uses them to lower payment processing fees from ~3% to ~1.5% at checkout.

Letture associate

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手2 min fa

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手2 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit33 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit33 min fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1 h fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片