A Decade-Old Coin: Zcash Also Faces a Midlife Crisis

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-09

Introduzione

Zcash, a nearly decade-old privacy-focused cryptocurrency, faced a major crisis when its entire core development team, the Electric Coin Company (ECC), collectively resigned on January 7. The team, led by CEO Josh Swihart, left due to a governance dispute with the board of the non-profit Bootstrap organization, which oversees ECC. The conflict centered around Zashi, a privacy-first mobile wallet developed by ECC. The team wanted to privatize Zashi to attract external investment and operate as a nimble startup, but the board opposed, citing legal and compliance risks associated with converting a non-profit asset into a for-profit entity. This disagreement escalated into public accusations, with Swihart calling the board’s actions “malicious governance” and accusing them of making working conditions untenable. The board members, referred to as “ZCAM” (Zaki Manian, Christina, Alan, Michelle), were criticized—particularly Zaki, who had prior controversies in the crypto space. Following the resignation, the former ECC team announced a new venture, CashZ, and plans to launch a new wallet based on Zashi’s codebase, allowing seamless migration for existing users. The incident highlights recurring tensions in crypto between non-profit foundations and entrepreneurial development teams, especially as projects mature and face valuation pressures. Zcash’s token ZEC had surged nearly 800% in late 2025, making governance and control over key assets like Zashi increasingly contentious.

Written by: Kuli, Shenchao TechFow

On January 7th, the core development team of Zcash collectively resigned.

Not just one or two people throwing a tantrum, but the entire Electric Coin Company, about 25 people, led by the CEO, all left.

This company has an abbreviation, ECC, and is the main developer behind Zcash. You can understand it as: the people who write the code, quit.

Upon the news, ZEC plummeted by 20%.

A hot piece of knowledge: Zcash is almost ten years old.

Launched on October 28, 2016, it's older than many people's time in the crypto space. Its selling point back then was "private transactions"—sender, receiver, amount, all encrypted, nothing visible on the chain.

But the reality is, after nine years online, less than 1% of ZEC transactions actually used this feature.

The remaining 99% are still running naked.

Nine years. The product isn't used, but the team kept grinding. The price dropped from over $3,000 when it first launched in 2016 to $15 in July 2024.

Then, by the end of 2025, ZEC suddenly surged.

It was hovering around $40 at the start of the year, and by November 7th, it soared to $744, market cap breaking $10 billion, clawing its way back into the top twenty.

The long-dormant narrative of privacy coins suddenly became sexy again.

Okay, the price skyrocketed nearly 800%, and then, "the development team ran away."

This story sounds like a middle-aged man's script. Bought a Porsche, then got divorced. Year-end bonus came in, then it's splitsville.

When there's little money, everyone is comrades; when money increases, they start fighting over who calls the shots.

What are they fighting over? A wallet called Zashi.

Zashi is a mobile wallet released by ECC in early 2024, promoting "privacy features enabled by default." It's the most important user entry point in the Zcash ecosystem.

The ECC team wanted to privatize Zashi, bring in external investment, and turn it into a startup capable of raising funds and iterating quickly.

But ECC is not an independent company. In 2020, ECC was placed into a non-profit organization called Bootstrap, structured as a US 501(c)(3).

Simply put, this structure is specifically for charities and public welfare organizations. The benefit is no taxes, the downside is that money made cannot be distributed to insiders, and how assets are handled must be approved by the board of directors.

Back then, this was done for compliance, to avoid regulatory pressure from the SEC. In a bear market, no one cared about these details, as there was no money to share anyway.

Now, the Bootstrap board says, no.

The board's reasons are:

We are a non-profit organization with a fiduciary duty to protect donor interests. Privatizing Zashi could be illegal, could lead to lawsuits, could be politically attacked. They even gave an example: Look at OpenAI, trying to transition from non-profit to for-profit, how many people sued.

ECC's former CEO, Josh Swihart, sees it differently. He said on Twitter that the board's actions constitute "malicious governance behavior," making it "impossible for the team to perform their duties effectively and with dignity."

He used a legal term: "constructive discharge," meaning although not formally fired, the working conditions were altered to make the job untenable, equivalent to being forced out.

25 people forced out together.

Simultaneously, Swihart named four board members: Zaki, Christina, Alan, Michelle. He connected their initials, calling them "ZCAM."

ZCAM. Sounds like SCAM. Not sure if it's intentional.

Among these four, Zaki Manian has the most stories.

He's an old-timer in the Cosmos ecosystem, was a core member of Tendermint. Resigned in 2020 after a public feud with founder Jae Kwon.

In 2023, the FBI informed him that two developers on a project he was responsible for were North Korean agents. After finding out, he concealed this for 16 months before making it public. In October 2024, Jae Kwon publicly accused him of "gross negligence" and "betraying the community's trust."

Now, he is a member of the Zcash board of directors.

The day after resigning, the former ECC team announced the formation of a new company, codenamed CashZ.

They said they would use the Zashi codebase to create a new wallet, to be launched within weeks. Existing Zashi users can migrate seamlessly.

"We are the same team, with the same mission: to build unstoppable private money."

No new token, no starting from scratch, just changing the shell to keep working.

The most ironic part of this, we think, is the timing.

When ZEC was $15, no one cared who managed the wallet. When it hit $500, how much Zashi was worth became a matter of life and death.

When money appears, you find out who's family.

Similarly, the conflict between a non-profit and a startup team: OpenAI ended with the board losing, Zcash ended with the team leaving.

Who won is unclear, but this conflict is indeed common in crypto projects.

Swihart wrote a passage on the CashZ website explaining why they left:

"The non-profit foundation model is a relic of the compliance era in crypto. An era where projects needed 'compliance buffers' to protect themselves. But these buffers introduced bureaucracy and divergence in roadmap. Startups can scale fast, non-profits cannot."

He also said: "Anyone who's been in crypto for a few years knows that the entanglement of non-profit foundations and tech startups is a source of endless drama."

It truly is endless drama.

In 2023, when Zooko stepped down as CEO, there were rumors of disagreements with Swihart. In January 2025, Zcash Foundation board member Peter Van Valkenburgh also resigned.

A decade-old coin, those who were supposed to leave have pretty much all gone.

Someone asked on Twitter: Will Zcash die?

The chain is still running. The code is still there. It's just that the people writing the code have changed.

But Swihart is right, the conflict between non-profits and startups is a common disease in this industry. Cosmos argued. The Ethereum Foundation argued. The Solana Foundation argued.

The difference is only in the manner and intensity of the arguments.

Zcash chose the most straightforward way.

Break up.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the resignation of the Zcash core development team?

AThe price of ZEC (Zcash) dropped by 20%.

QWhat was the primary reason for the conflict between the ECC team and the Bootstrap board of directors?

AThe conflict centered on the ECC team's proposal to privatize the Zashi wallet and bring in external investment, which the non-profit Bootstrap board opposed due to legal and fiduciary concerns.

QWhat is the name of the new company formed by the former ECC team, and what is its first project?

AThe new company is called CashZ, and its first project is to launch a new wallet based on the Zashi codebase, allowing for seamless migration for existing users.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of ZEC transactions actually used the coin's flagship privacy feature?

ALess than 1% of ZEC transactions used the privacy feature.

QWhich controversial figure on the Bootstrap board was previously involved in a scandal concerning North Korean developers?

AZaki Manian, a member of the Bootstrap board (part of the 'ZCAM' group), was previously involved in a scandal where he waited 16 months to disclose that two developers on a project he oversaw were North Korean agents.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit9 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit9 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit10 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit10 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit11 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare CORE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di CORE (CORE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CORECORE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva CORE (CORE)Dopo aver acquistato CORE (CORE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia CORE (CORE)Scambia facilmente CORE (CORE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

207 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare CORE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di CORE CORE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片