A Decade-Old Coin: Zcash Also Faces a Midlife Crisis

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-09

Introduzione

Zcash, a nearly decade-old privacy-focused cryptocurrency, faced a major crisis when its entire core development team, the Electric Coin Company (ECC), collectively resigned on January 7. The team, led by CEO Josh Swihart, left due to a governance dispute with the board of the non-profit Bootstrap organization, which oversees ECC. The conflict centered around Zashi, a privacy-first mobile wallet developed by ECC. The team wanted to privatize Zashi to attract external investment and operate as a nimble startup, but the board opposed, citing legal and compliance risks associated with converting a non-profit asset into a for-profit entity. This disagreement escalated into public accusations, with Swihart calling the board’s actions “malicious governance” and accusing them of making working conditions untenable. The board members, referred to as “ZCAM” (Zaki Manian, Christina, Alan, Michelle), were criticized—particularly Zaki, who had prior controversies in the crypto space. Following the resignation, the former ECC team announced a new venture, CashZ, and plans to launch a new wallet based on Zashi’s codebase, allowing seamless migration for existing users. The incident highlights recurring tensions in crypto between non-profit foundations and entrepreneurial development teams, especially as projects mature and face valuation pressures. Zcash’s token ZEC had surged nearly 800% in late 2025, making governance and control over key assets like Zashi increasingly contentious.

Written by: Kuli, Shenchao TechFow

On January 7th, the core development team of Zcash collectively resigned.

Not just one or two people throwing a tantrum, but the entire Electric Coin Company, about 25 people, led by the CEO, all left.

This company has an abbreviation, ECC, and is the main developer behind Zcash. You can understand it as: the people who write the code, quit.

Upon the news, ZEC plummeted by 20%.

A hot piece of knowledge: Zcash is almost ten years old.

Launched on October 28, 2016, it's older than many people's time in the crypto space. Its selling point back then was "private transactions"—sender, receiver, amount, all encrypted, nothing visible on the chain.

But the reality is, after nine years online, less than 1% of ZEC transactions actually used this feature.

The remaining 99% are still running naked.

Nine years. The product isn't used, but the team kept grinding. The price dropped from over $3,000 when it first launched in 2016 to $15 in July 2024.

Then, by the end of 2025, ZEC suddenly surged.

It was hovering around $40 at the start of the year, and by November 7th, it soared to $744, market cap breaking $10 billion, clawing its way back into the top twenty.

The long-dormant narrative of privacy coins suddenly became sexy again.

Okay, the price skyrocketed nearly 800%, and then, "the development team ran away."

This story sounds like a middle-aged man's script. Bought a Porsche, then got divorced. Year-end bonus came in, then it's splitsville.

When there's little money, everyone is comrades; when money increases, they start fighting over who calls the shots.

What are they fighting over? A wallet called Zashi.

Zashi is a mobile wallet released by ECC in early 2024, promoting "privacy features enabled by default." It's the most important user entry point in the Zcash ecosystem.

The ECC team wanted to privatize Zashi, bring in external investment, and turn it into a startup capable of raising funds and iterating quickly.

But ECC is not an independent company. In 2020, ECC was placed into a non-profit organization called Bootstrap, structured as a US 501(c)(3).

Simply put, this structure is specifically for charities and public welfare organizations. The benefit is no taxes, the downside is that money made cannot be distributed to insiders, and how assets are handled must be approved by the board of directors.

Back then, this was done for compliance, to avoid regulatory pressure from the SEC. In a bear market, no one cared about these details, as there was no money to share anyway.

Now, the Bootstrap board says, no.

The board's reasons are:

We are a non-profit organization with a fiduciary duty to protect donor interests. Privatizing Zashi could be illegal, could lead to lawsuits, could be politically attacked. They even gave an example: Look at OpenAI, trying to transition from non-profit to for-profit, how many people sued.

ECC's former CEO, Josh Swihart, sees it differently. He said on Twitter that the board's actions constitute "malicious governance behavior," making it "impossible for the team to perform their duties effectively and with dignity."

He used a legal term: "constructive discharge," meaning although not formally fired, the working conditions were altered to make the job untenable, equivalent to being forced out.

25 people forced out together.

Simultaneously, Swihart named four board members: Zaki, Christina, Alan, Michelle. He connected their initials, calling them "ZCAM."

ZCAM. Sounds like SCAM. Not sure if it's intentional.

Among these four, Zaki Manian has the most stories.

He's an old-timer in the Cosmos ecosystem, was a core member of Tendermint. Resigned in 2020 after a public feud with founder Jae Kwon.

In 2023, the FBI informed him that two developers on a project he was responsible for were North Korean agents. After finding out, he concealed this for 16 months before making it public. In October 2024, Jae Kwon publicly accused him of "gross negligence" and "betraying the community's trust."

Now, he is a member of the Zcash board of directors.

The day after resigning, the former ECC team announced the formation of a new company, codenamed CashZ.

They said they would use the Zashi codebase to create a new wallet, to be launched within weeks. Existing Zashi users can migrate seamlessly.

"We are the same team, with the same mission: to build unstoppable private money."

No new token, no starting from scratch, just changing the shell to keep working.

The most ironic part of this, we think, is the timing.

When ZEC was $15, no one cared who managed the wallet. When it hit $500, how much Zashi was worth became a matter of life and death.

When money appears, you find out who's family.

Similarly, the conflict between a non-profit and a startup team: OpenAI ended with the board losing, Zcash ended with the team leaving.

Who won is unclear, but this conflict is indeed common in crypto projects.

Swihart wrote a passage on the CashZ website explaining why they left:

"The non-profit foundation model is a relic of the compliance era in crypto. An era where projects needed 'compliance buffers' to protect themselves. But these buffers introduced bureaucracy and divergence in roadmap. Startups can scale fast, non-profits cannot."

He also said: "Anyone who's been in crypto for a few years knows that the entanglement of non-profit foundations and tech startups is a source of endless drama."

It truly is endless drama.

In 2023, when Zooko stepped down as CEO, there were rumors of disagreements with Swihart. In January 2025, Zcash Foundation board member Peter Van Valkenburgh also resigned.

A decade-old coin, those who were supposed to leave have pretty much all gone.

Someone asked on Twitter: Will Zcash die?

The chain is still running. The code is still there. It's just that the people writing the code have changed.

But Swihart is right, the conflict between non-profits and startups is a common disease in this industry. Cosmos argued. The Ethereum Foundation argued. The Solana Foundation argued.

The difference is only in the manner and intensity of the arguments.

Zcash chose the most straightforward way.

Break up.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the resignation of the Zcash core development team?

AThe price of ZEC (Zcash) dropped by 20%.

QWhat was the primary reason for the conflict between the ECC team and the Bootstrap board of directors?

AThe conflict centered on the ECC team's proposal to privatize the Zashi wallet and bring in external investment, which the non-profit Bootstrap board opposed due to legal and fiduciary concerns.

QWhat is the name of the new company formed by the former ECC team, and what is its first project?

AThe new company is called CashZ, and its first project is to launch a new wallet based on the Zashi codebase, allowing for seamless migration for existing users.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of ZEC transactions actually used the coin's flagship privacy feature?

ALess than 1% of ZEC transactions used the privacy feature.

QWhich controversial figure on the Bootstrap board was previously involved in a scandal concerning North Korean developers?

AZaki Manian, a member of the Bootstrap board (part of the 'ZCAM' group), was previously involved in a scandal where he waited 16 months to disclose that two developers on a project he oversaw were North Korean agents.

Letture associate

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit2 min fa

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit2 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit11 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit11 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit12 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit12 min fa

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

On July 31, South Korean stocks staged a historic rebound. The benchmark KOSPI index surged 18.27%, with chipmaker SK Hynix hitting a 30% gain limit. This followed a brutal, near-40% decline in the KOSPI over the previous month, driven largely by a deleveraging spiral involving leveraged ETFs. Analysts attributed the sharp sell-off to structural liquidity issues rather than deteriorating corporate fundamentals. The rally was triggered by a confluence of positive catalysts. Firstly, strong earnings from U.S. cloud giants Microsoft and Amazon alleviated fears of an "AI bubble burst," boosting global tech sentiment. Secondly, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won made a rare personal purchase of SK Hynix shares, seen as a strong vote of confidence. Thirdly, the South Korean government announced a 20 trillion won ($139 billion) AI investment fund. In response to the market turmoil, South Korean regulators are tightening controls on leveraged ETFs, admitting oversight shortcomings. Measures include raising minimum cash保证金 requirements for散户 investors and suspending new product launches. While the rebound signals eased liquidity pressure, analysts note deep structural issues remain. The market's future stability is seen as dependent on global tech capital expenditure trends and memory chip price cycles, with some viewing the surge as a technical correction rather than a definitive trend reversal.

marsbit32 min fa

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

marsbit32 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare CORE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di CORE (CORE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CORECORE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva CORE (CORE)Dopo aver acquistato CORE (CORE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia CORE (CORE)Scambia facilmente CORE (CORE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

258 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare CORE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di CORE CORE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片