Why SBI Holdings’ Coinhako acquisition matters for its stablecoin strategy

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-19

Introduzione

SBI Holdings' acquisition of Singapore-licensed crypto exchange Coinhako is a strategic move to advance its digital asset infrastructure and stablecoin ambitions in Asia. The purchase provides SBI with an established Southeast Asian client base and strengthens its position in Singapore's regulated market. It aligns with SBI's long-term goal of creating a global digital asset corridor to reduce the costs and friction of cross-border transactions. Critically, Coinhako's network could boost SBI's JPYSC stablecoin by enabling future wider interoperability beyond SBI's own ecosystem. This deal is part of SBI's broader crypto expansion, following other investments and its recent partnership with the Solana Foundation to develop yen-backed stablecoins and tokenized assets.

Rather than just investing in cryptocurrencies, SBI Holdings is establishing itself as one of Asia’s top providers of digital asset infrastructure.

By purchasing Coinhako, SBI is acquiring a licensed cryptocurrency platform with a well-established clientele throughout Southeast Asia.

Additionally, the deal accelerates SBI’s regional expansion by strengthening its position in Singapore, one of the most crypto-friendly but strictly regulated markets in the world.

SBI’s long-term plan

That said, the purchase aligns with SBI’s long-term goal of establishing a “global corridor for digital assets.”

This is because moving funds or investments across borders has historically involved several middlemen, currency conversions, settlement delays, and increased costs. To lessen these frictions, SBI plans to employ blockchain technology.

Remarking on the same, Coinhako co-founder and CEO Yusho Liu said,

For the past 10 years, we have built from the ground up Southeast Asia’s most trusted and legally compliant cryptocurrency platform in the world’s most advanced regulatory environment.

How will Coinhako boost SBI’s stablecoin plan?

Additionally, Coinhako would help SBI strengthen its stablecoin aspirations. For context, SBI had introduced JPYSC, a stablecoin denominated in yen, earlier this year. However, due to its inability to be withdrawn to external wallets, JPYSC currently circulates only within the SBI ecosystem.

Nevertheless, if technical advancements and regulatory approvals permit wider interoperability, incorporating Coinhako’s exchange and customer network may eventually be beneficial.

What’s more?

Notably, the acquisition is a component of SBI’s larger expansion into the cryptocurrency space. It comes after Bitbank was purchased, EDX Markets and Gauntlet were invested in, and its JPYSC stablecoin was introduced. This further coincided with the announcement of a recent partnership between SBI Holdings and the Solana Foundation.

The collaboration aims to create yen-backed stablecoins, tokenized assets, cross-border payments, and institutional services by fusing Solana’s quick, inexpensive blockchain with SBI’s financial and regulatory know-how.

Final Summary

  • SBI Holdings new plan aims to ease cross-border transfers without several middlemen, currency conversions, settlement delays, and increased costs.
  • The acquisition of Bitbank, investments in EDX Markets and Gauntlet, and the introduction of its JPYSC stablecoin are some of SBI’s crypto tides.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the strategic significance of SBI Holdings acquiring Coinhako for its overall business?

AThe acquisition of Coinhako establishes SBI as a leading digital asset infrastructure provider in Asia, accelerates its expansion into the strictly regulated but crypto-friendly Singapore market, and supports its long-term goal of creating a 'global corridor for digital assets' to streamline cross-border fund movements.

QHow will the Coinhako acquisition specifically support SBI's stablecoin strategy?

ACoinhako, with its licensed platform and established customer network in Southeast Asia, can provide the necessary exchange infrastructure and user base. This integration would allow SBI's JPYSC stablecoin to potentially circulate beyond its own ecosystem, pending future technical advancements and regulatory approvals for wider interoperability.

QWhat is SBI's 'global corridor for digital assets' and how does blockchain technology relate to it?

ASBI's 'global corridor for digital assets' is a long-term plan to facilitate smoother cross-border movement of funds and investments. It aims to eliminate traditional frictions like multiple middlemen, currency conversions, settlement delays, and high costs by employing blockchain technology.

QBesides the Coinhako deal, what other recent moves has SBI made in the cryptocurrency space?

AOther recent moves include the acquisition of Bitbank, investments in EDX Markets and Gauntlet, the introduction of its JPYSC stablecoin, and a partnership with the Solana Foundation to develop yen-backed stablecoins, tokenized assets, and cross-border payment services.

QWhat limitations does SBI's JPYSC stablecoin currently face according to the article?

ACurrently, the JPYSC stablecoin cannot be withdrawn to external wallets, which restricts its circulation solely within the SBI ecosystem.

Letture associate

North Korean-Linked Contractor Infiltrated MetaMask for a Month, The Real Vulnerability in Crypto Projects Isn't in the Code

A contractor linked to North Korea gained access to MetaMask's code repository through a third-party vendor, working from March 9 until being removed in April. Consensys, MetaMask's parent company, stated no user assets, data, or security were compromised, and no malicious code was deployed. The company identified the threat, terminated access, launched an investigation, and notified law enforcement. The incident highlights critical vulnerabilities in outsourced management for crypto projects, where operational failures—not code bugs—are the primary risk. Reports indicate roughly 76% of stolen DeFi funds in early 2024 resulted from operational attacks on keys, custody, signatures, and approvals. Security guidelines recommend stringent contractor vetting—including identity verification, background checks, and multi-interview processes—along with enforcing principle of least privilege for code access. Key measures include making code activity traceable, reviewing all production changes, conducting extra scrutiny on external contributions, and swiftly revoking access when no longer needed. The event underscores the need for continuous conditional access for contractors and predefined protocols to halt deployments during security investigations.

marsbit7 min fa

North Korean-Linked Contractor Infiltrated MetaMask for a Month, The Real Vulnerability in Crypto Projects Isn't in the Code

marsbit7 min fa

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight News25 min fa

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight News25 min fa

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News1 h fa

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News1 h fa

zcashd shuts down, Zcash enters Ironwood era: Is quantum-resistant privacy the future?

Zcash has completed its infrastructure transition by retiring the original zcashd software and fully adopting the Rust-based Zebra and Zakura node implementations. This shift, finalizing in July 2024, enhances network maintainability and prepares for the upcoming Ironwood era. Despite a previously disclosed vulnerability in the Orchard shielded pool, user confidence appears resilient. Shielded transaction volume grew 11.1% quarter-over-quarter, and the anonymity set expanded significantly, even as total shielded balances saw a moderate decline. The prompt containment of the Orchard flaw, which did not threaten total ZEC supply, demonstrated effective protocol safeguards. The incoming Ironwood upgrade aims to further strengthen long-term security through formal verification and quantum-resistant features, moving Zcash from reactive fixes to proactive, verifiable security assurances.

ambcrypto1 h fa

zcashd shuts down, Zcash enters Ironwood era: Is quantum-resistant privacy the future?

ambcrypto1 h fa

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1 h fa

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片