Who Are the Real Winners in the 'Tokenization' Narrative?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-20

Introduzione

The article explores the real beneficiaries of the tokenization narrative and concludes that nearly everyone stands to gain, though the timing, reasons, and mechanisms differ significantly. Retail investors benefit through democratized access, as tokenization removes systemic barriers that previously excluded them from high-yield assets like private credit. They can now invest with small amounts, trade 24/7, access global assets, and use programmable capital in DeFi strategies. Issuers gain from faster, cheaper, and broader fundraising. Tokenization reduces settlement times from weeks to minutes, lowers operational costs through smart contracts, and enables innovative product designs like tranched risk products and dynamic yield mechanisms. Institutions are drawn to tokenization for its operational efficiencies: near-instant settlement (T+0) reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital, and cuts costs. Major players like BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are already implementing tokenized solutions for these advantages. Infrastructure builders—such as custodians, compliance providers, and data oracles—are positioned to become the foundational layer of a multi-trillion-dollar market, akin to "picks and shovels" in a gold rush. Emerging markets experience a transformative impact, as tokenization and stablecoins offer financial inclusion to billions. They provide access to dollar-denominated assets, inflation-resistant savings, low-cost remittances, and real-time payrol...

I discussed this topic last week, and Andy from Rollup also raised related questions. Everyone keeps asking: Who are the real beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization?

The real answer is: Almost everyone benefits, but the reasons, timing, and underlying logic are completely different.

Retail Investor Perspective: From Spectators to Participants

For decades, retail investors have been systematically excluded from high-yield assets. Not because the assets are too complex, but because the traditional financial system is designed for large amounts of capital, accredited investors, and inefficient clearing—small investments simply aren't cost-effective.

Tokenization doesn't just lower the barrier; it dismantles the entire system that creates barriers.

Consider what it's like for retail investors to invest in private credit now:

· Minimum investment typically $250K–$1M

· Must be an accredited investor

· Lock-up period of 3–7 years

· Almost no secondary market

· Completely at the mercy of fund managers

Once such a fund is tokenized:

· Fractional ownership: Invest with $100, not $1M. Smart contracts solve the high cost of managing small amounts.

· 7×24 trading: No market open/close times, no clearing windows, no waiting for bank transfers.

· Globally accessible: Retail investors in Lagos, Jakarta, and São Paulo can buy the same tokenized treasury fund as those in Manhattan.

· Composability: Tokenized assets are programmable capital. They can be used as loan collateral, in vault strategies, or transferred across platforms—no broker needed.

Deeper insight: Retail investors gain not just "cheaper access to the same things," but a whole new set of financial behaviors.

Within an afternoon, one can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, use them as collateral to borrow stablecoins, and then deploy them into yield strategies—all self-custodied, without calling a wealth manager.

Before tokenization, retail investors were spectators in the global capital markets. After tokenization, they become participants. The difference is immense.

Issuer Perspective: Faster Funding, Broader Channels, Lower Costs

For issuers, the logic is simple: Tokenization enables faster funding, lower costs, and an exponentially larger investor base. Every issuer cares about these three points, and tokenization delivers on all of them.

The shift from traditional issuance to tokenized issuance:

· Traditional settlement takes weeks to months; tokenization completes in minutes to hours.

· Traditional methods require custodians, transfer agents, brokers, and clearinghouses; tokenization uses smart contracts for distribution, compliance, and clearing.

· Traditional methods are limited by geography, regulation, and minimums; tokenization is global, 7×24, and accessible with small amounts.

· Traditional manual reconciliation, quarterly reports, and shareholder registry upkeep are extremely costly; tokenization enables automated reporting, on-chain transparency, and real-time data.

· Traditional product structures are rigid; tokenization supports tiered design, flexible redemptions, and dynamic yield mechanisms.

A traditional private credit fund typically serves 50–200 institutions, with a fundraising round taking months. A tokenized fund can serve thousands of investors: compliance is programmable, account opening is digital, and the barrier is extremely low—retail investors, small family offices, and crypto-native institutions can all participate.

Tokenization also enables entirely new product design capabilities:

· Creating tiered products with different risk/return profiles within a single smart contract

· Flexible daily/weekly/monthly redemptions, executed automatically by code

· Dynamic yield mechanisms based on on-chain data

· Hybrid products combining fixed income with DeFi yields

These are too costly to implement in traditional finance but are simple in a tokenized system.

Institutional Perspective: Clearing, Transparency, Structural Risk Reduction

Institutions don't care about crypto concepts or decentralization ideals. What they are truly obsessed with is: counterparty risk, operational costs, reporting accuracy, and regulatory compliance.

And tokenization offers quantifiable improvements in every one of these areas. This is why top global financial institutions are all entering the space.

The current financial system operates on at least T+2 settlement. This means that for two days after a trade:

· Counterparty default risk persists

· Capital is tied up and cannot be reused

· Reconciliation, margin, and collateral management are extremely complex

Tokenization makes settlement nearly instantaneous (T+0). This alone can:

· Release vast amounts of capital tied up in settlement cycles

· Eliminate counterparty risk during the settlement period

· Greatly reduce reliance on back-end systems like clearinghouses and central counterparties

This transformation could bring about potential annual efficiency gains of approximately $2.4 trillion globally. By 2030, conservative short-term annual gains are estimated between $31 billion and $130 billion.

Major players already in action:

· BlackRock launched the tokenized money market fund BUIDL, with over $1 billion in assets

· Franklin Templeton put fund shares on-chain via BENJI

· J.P. Morgan built the Onyx platform for tokenized repo and collateral management

· Goldman Sachs, HSBC, UBS, Citi are all piloting or building tokenization infrastructure

They're not in it because blockchain is trendy, but because it's cheaper, faster, and lower risk.

Infrastructure Builder Perspective: The "Pickaxe Sellers" in a Trillion-Dollar Market

In every major transformation, the winners are those who build the infrastructure. The picks in the gold rush, the servers for the internet, AWS for cloud computing.

Real-world asset tokenization is building a new financial infrastructure. The companies that get it right will become the underlying pipes for a market exceeding $11 trillion.

Essential modules for this ecosystem:

· Custodians: Ensure the legal correspondence between on-chain tokens and real-world assets—one of the most critical roles.

· Compliance layer: KYC/AML, investor accreditation, geographic restrictions, cross-border compliance—all programmable.

· Issuance platforms: Enable anyone to tokenize assets legally and simply.

· Clearing and settlement infrastructure: Enable instant settlement, connecting on-chain and traditional banking systems.

· Oracles and data: Bring net asset value, interest rates, defaults, real estate prices, commodity prices on-chain—the foundation for token pricing.

· Legal and structuring services: SPVs, trusts, fund structures—without a legal underlying, a token is just a string of digits.

Emerging Markets Perspective: The Overlooked True Revolution

Rarely discussed in Western finance circles, but potentially the most important part: For billions in emerging markets, tokenization isn't "better finance"—it's the first financial system truly built for them.

Financial challenges in many emerging markets:

· High inflation, rapid local currency depreciation;

· Large unbanked or underbanked populations;

· Capital controls, preventing allocation to foreign currency and overseas assets;

· Cross-border remittance fees of 5%–10%, taking days;

· Extremely low local asset returns, failing to beat inflation.

Tokenization + stablecoins change all of this:

· Earn dollar yields without a U.S. bank account. Someone in Argentina can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, earning dollar yields via stablecoins. All that's needed is a wallet and internet—no accredited investor status, no wire transfers. In a country with 40% annual currency depreciation, this isn't an improvement; it's a lifeline.

· Stablecoins become savings tools. In high-inflation countries, USDC and USDT have become de facto savings vehicles for preserving value. Tokenized assets add yield on top of this.

· Ordinary people can invest in top global assets. People in Southeast Asia and Africa previously had almost no access to: U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade bonds, private credit, global real estate. Tokenization makes these assets fractional and 7×24 accessible.

· Instant, low-cost cross-border transfers. Remittances are vital for many economies, but traditional methods have high fees and slow processing. Stablecoins and tokenized assets complete transfers in minutes at minimal cost.

· Real-time payroll settlement. Wages can be paid on-chain in real-time; employees don't have to wait for payday and can withdraw anytime.

Globally, about 1.4 billion adults are unbanked, and billions more are underbanked. Tokenization + stablecoins offer the first path to truly large-scale financial inclusion that doesn't rely on traditional banks.

For these people, tokenization isn't just "making finance a bit better"—it's making finance accessible for the first time.

Complete Beneficiary Map

· Retail investors: Gain access and composability—low barrier, global, programmable capital.

· Issuers: Faster funding, lower costs, broader investor base, more flexible products.

· Institutions: Real-time settlement, risk reduction, lower operational costs, increased transparency.

· Regulators: On-chain traceability, embedded compliance—shifting from passive to real-time, precise oversight.

· Infrastructure providers: Become the underlying pipes of a trillion-dollar market, with massive long-term gains.

· Emerging markets: Truly achieve financial inclusion, solving structural issues like inflation, controls, and lack of services.

Essential Risk Disclaimer

Tokenization is not a panacea:

· It cannot fix bad assets

· It does not guarantee liquidity

· It does not make risks disappear

Tokenized bonds can still default; tokenized real estate can still drop in value. If the legal structure is weak, custody is unreliable, oracles are fraudulent, or the issuer doesn't manage the asset, the token is worthless.

All the benefits are real, supported by logic and reality, but they only materialize if the legal, custody, compliance, and operational aspects are all done correctly.

The token is just the final piece; everything underlying it is what truly matters.

Tokenization is not magic; it's infrastructure. And infrastructure only works if built correctly.

So, Who Benefits the Most?

Frankly: It depends on the timeframe.

· Short-term: Institutions and issuers win first

They save real money immediately on clearing, compliance, and operations—no need for retail investors or secondary markets, just better infrastructure.

· Medium-term: Infrastructure and technology providers win

By 2030, the market size could reach $11 trillion. Companies in custody, compliance, issuance, and clearing will become industry standards.

· Long-term: Retail investors and emerging market populations ultimately benefit the most

When infrastructure matures, compliance stabilizes, and secondary markets deepen, anyone globally can invest in any asset, 7×24, using their phone.

So, the answer to "who benefits the most" isn't a single group. Rather: Everyone benefits, just at different times, for different reasons, in different ways.

Domande pertinenti

QWho are the main beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization according to the article?

AAlmost everyone benefits, but in different ways, at different times, and for different underlying reasons. The key beneficiaries include retail investors, issuers, institutions, infrastructure builders, and emerging markets.

QHow does tokenization specifically benefit retail investors?

ATokenization transforms retail investors from spectators into participants by lowering investment thresholds (e.g., $100 instead of $1 million), enabling 24/7 global access, providing composability (e.g., using tokens as collateral for loans), and allowing self-custody without intermediaries.

QWhat advantages do institutions gain from asset tokenization?

AInstitutions benefit from near-instant settlement (T+0), which reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital tied in清算 cycles, lowers operational costs, improves transparency, and enhances regulatory compliance.

QWhy is tokenization particularly transformative for emerging markets?

AFor emerging markets, tokenization provides the first accessible financial system by enabling dollar-denominated收益 (e.g., via tokenized U.S. treasuries), offering stablecoin savings tools, allowing global asset investment, facilitating low-cost cross-border transfers, and enabling real-time payroll结算—addressing issues like high inflation and limited banking access.

QWhat are the critical risks associated with tokenization mentioned in the article?

ATokenization cannot fix bad assets, guarantee liquidity, or eliminate risks. It relies on proper legal structures, reliable custody, accurate oracles, and competent asset management. Without these, tokenized assets may become worthless.

Letture associate

From 'Global Computer/Settlement Layer' to 'Bulletin Board': What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

In a significant shift of perspective, Vitalik Buterin recently proposed that Ethereum's core value may not lie in its function as a "world computer" or "global settlement layer," but rather as a simple yet powerful primitive: a cryptographically secure, globally shared "public bulletin board." This concept emphasizes data availability—a neutral, uncensorable, and permanent data layer where anyone can read and write information, but no single entity (including governments or developers) can alter or erase it. This "global shared memory" supports applications like secure voting systems, certificate revocation lists, and decentralized coordination—scenarios that require verifiable and tamper-proof data publishing rather than complex on-chain execution. The emergence of AI further validates this direction. As AI agents and services grow, so does the need for privacy-preserving and trustless interactions. Proposals like ZK API Usage Credits illustrate how Ethereum can enable anonymous AI model access and agent-to-agent economic coordination, relying precisely on the blockchain’s transparent and immutable data layer. Rather than a step back, this reframing represents a maturation of Ethereum’s vision—from defining what it can do to serving as essential infrastructure for what the world truly needs: a foundational layer of truth in an increasingly automated and opaque digital era.

marsbit1 h fa

From 'Global Computer/Settlement Layer' to 'Bulletin Board': What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

marsbit1 h fa

When Wall Street's ETH Starts to 'Earn': From BlackRock's ETHB to Ethereum's Asset Attribute Shift

Wall Street Embraces Staking: BlackRock's ETHB and Ethereum's Shift to a Yield-Generating Asset On March 12, 2026, BlackRock launched the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ETHB) on Nasdaq, a groundbreaking Ethereum ETF that not only holds spot ETH but also stakes a significant portion (70-95%) of its assets to generate and distribute yield to investors. This move effectively answers a long-debated question: whether ETH can be accepted by mainstream finance as a yield-bearing asset. ETHB operates by delegating staking to professional validators like Figment via Coinbase Prime. It distributes approximately 82% of the staking rewards (estimated at 2.3%-2.5% APY after fees) to shareholders monthly, while retaining 18% as service fees and charging a 0.25% annual management fee. This provides a predictable, automated cash flow, though it lacks the compounding effect of native on-chain staking unless investors manually reinvest distributions. This development is significant as it marks the formal entry of staking—a core crypto-native activity—into Wall Street's asset framework. Under new SEC leadership, regulatory barriers have eased, allowing BlackRock to legitimize staking rewards as a viable investment return. This paves the way for other PoS-based ETFs (e.g., Solana, Cardano) and may shift substantial capital from traditional spot ETFs to yield-generating products. While on-chain staking options remain popular (e.g., native staking, liquid staking via Lido/Rocket Pool, or wallet-based staking), ETHB’s introduction signals a broader shift: ETH is increasingly viewed not just as a speculative asset, but as a productive, cash-flow-generating machine. The trend of making assets "work" is now irreversible, whether through traditional financial products or decentralized protocols.

marsbit1 h fa

When Wall Street's ETH Starts to 'Earn': From BlackRock's ETHB to Ethereum's Asset Attribute Shift

marsbit1 h fa

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its focus to incentivizing liquidity providers (LPs) to address its core issue of low liquidity. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets like crypto price movements and select sports events. This fee, highest near 50% probability, funds new LP reward programs. There are two primary reward systems: one pays LPs when their limit orders are executed (maker rewards), and another rewards simply for placing orders within a set spread to provide liquidity, even if they don't get filled. A third mechanism allows anyone to sponsor additional incentives for specific markets. A positive view argues this structure values genuine liquidity over mere trading volume, making fees earned and rewards received a potential key, anti-sybil metric for a future POLY token airdrop. It rewards users who improve market depth and stability. A contrasting, negative view claims the LP program is a "trap." Critics argue that professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that most LPs are actually losing money due to hidden "LP wear and tear" (impermanent loss), only participating based on speculation of a valuable airdrop. They warn that if Polymarket expands fees to fund these unsustainable rewards, it could lose its competitive edge of zero fees and better odds compared to traditional sportsbooks. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee only on profits, using a native POLY pool for liquidity, or charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

marsbit4 h fa

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

marsbit4 h fa

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its incentive structure towards rewarding Liquidity Providers (LPs) to solve its core problem of low market depth. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets (all Crypto markets, NCAAB basketball, and Serie A football) to fund new LP reward programs. The fee is calculated on a symmetric curve, highest near 50% probability. The platform has introduced two main incentive systems: one rewards LPs whose limit orders are executed (Maker Incentives), and another rewards LPs simply for providing resting liquidity, even if orders aren't filled (Liquidity Incentives). A third system allows anyone to sponsor additional rewards for specific markets. A key argument is that the fees paid and rewards earned could be a strong anti-sybil metric for a potential POLY token airdrop, valuing genuine liquidity provision over mere trading volume. However, a counter viewpoint argues the LP program is a potential trap. Critics claim that the displayed ROI for LPs is misleading as it doesn't account for "LP wear and tear"—losses from filled orders that can't be easily exited. They state professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that the model of subsidizing liquidity with massive daily rewards is unsustainable. The concern is that widespread fee implementation could erase Polymarket's competitive edge over traditional betting platforms. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee on profits only, using a POLY token for native liquidity, and charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

Odaily星球日报4 h fa

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Odaily星球日报4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片