Argentine Banking Groups Quietly Develop Peso-Pegged Stablecoins for the Institutional Market

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-28

Introduzione

Argentine banking groups are quietly developing peso-pegged stablecoins for the institutional market. While US dollar-linked stablecoins like USDC and USDT are popular in Argentina, fintech companies are now focusing on local alternatives. Two major initiatives are underway. The BIND Group, through its virtual asset service provider BEN, is developing a peso stablecoin and has partnered with Circle to offer institutional clients payment and treasury use cases. Separately, the Petersen Group is developing a stablecoin called DIPE via a subsidiary, supported by crypto-as-a-service company Lirium. Both projects are being advanced by entities backed by banking conglomerates, not the banks themselves, due to a Central Bank of Argentina ban from May 2022 prohibiting private banks from offering crypto services to clients. The primary target is the institutional sector, which could benefit from the programmable features of a digital peso for treasury management, event-triggered blockchain payments, and collateralized lending management. These initiatives could expand to private banks in the future if the central bank lifts its crypto ban. This development comes as regulators scrutinize existing crypto offerings; in March, the national securities regulator highlighted that the "argt peso" stablecoin was being offered as a security without proper compliance.

While dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC and USDT are popular in Argentina as dollar substitutes, fintech companies have turned their attention to local stablecoins.

A recent Iproup report highlights that two banking holding groups are developing stablecoins pegged to the Argentine peso, with a particular focus on providing programmable money services for institutional clients.

The BIND Group—a holding company with over $2 billion in assets under management, which owns BIND Banco Industrial—will develop a peso stablecoin through BEN, its in-house Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP). The conglomerate also announced a partnership with Circle to provide institutional access to BEN's clients, supporting payment and treasury use cases in compliance with local regulations.

The Petersen Group, which also owns several regional banks, will advance the second initiative through a subsidiary with support from Lirium—a 'crypto-as-a-service' solution provider for Banco Galicia and Brubank. This offering, called DIPE, has already passed the development stage and has its own whitepaper.

These two initiatives share a common thread: they are promoted by companies backed by banking conglomerates, but not by the banking groups themselves, as the Central Bank of Argentina has prohibited private banks from offering crypto-related services to their clients since May 2022.

The primary target audience for these offerings will be the institutional sector, which can leverage the 'smart' features of the digital peso for payments. Use cases for these initiatives include treasury management operations, event-triggered payments on the blockchain, and collateralized loan management.

Although decentralized peso alternatives are already available, these offerings will rely on the backing of banking groups, with the potential to expand their use to private banks in the future, as reports indicate the central bank is considering lifting the ban on crypto offerings.

Nevertheless, in March, the argt peso stablecoin drew scrutiny from the national securities market regulator, which emphasized that it constitutes a security offered without proper compliance.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason why the stablecoin initiatives in Argentina are being developed by entities linked to banking groups, not directly by the banks themselves?

AThe Central Bank of Argentina has prohibited private banks from offering cryptocurrency-related services to their clients since May 2022. Therefore, the initiatives are being promoted by companies supported by banking conglomerates instead of the bank groups directly.

QWhat are the two banking holding groups mentioned in the article that are developing peso-pegged stablecoins?

AThe two banking holding groups are the BIND Group (via its VASP provider BEN) and the Petersen Group (via a subsidiary and supported by Lirium).

QWhat primary market are these new peso stablecoin initiatives targeting, and what are some of their intended use cases?

AThe primary target market is the institutional sector. Intended use cases include treasury management operations, event-triggered payments in blockchain, and collateralized loan management.

QAccording to the article, what happened in March regarding a stablecoin called 'argt peso'?

AIn March, the argt peso stablecoin drew attention from the national securities regulator, which stated that it represents a security being offered without proper compliance.

QWhat potential future development might allow private banks to offer these stablecoin services directly?

AThere are reports that the central bank is considering lifting its ban on cryptocurrency offerings, which could potentially allow for the expansion of these stablecoin services to private banks in the future.

Letture associate

He Let GPT-5.6 Sol Run for 33 Hours Straight to Tackle Fermat's Last Theorem, Forcibly Terminated by the System

This article discusses a real-world experiment by expert Michael P. Frank to test if an AI, specifically GPT-5.6 Sol, could autonomously make progress on a major unsolved mathematical problem: finding a simpler proof for Fermat's Last Theorem. The AI was tasked with exploring specific mathematical pathways and maintaining rigorous notes over approximately 33 hours. However, the session was terminated by OpenAI's systems. The AI itself suggested two possible reasons for the stoppage: excessive resource consumption, or OpenAI having previously failed on similar problems and wishing to conserve computational resources. The AI reported its work primarily involved refining plausible ideas into precise, verifiable statements, most of which were subsequently disproven or excluded—effectively creating a map of dead ends rather than a proof. The incident sparked debate online. Some speculated that OpenAI might deliberately restrict public access to its most powerful models to maintain a competitive edge or avoid regulatory scrutiny, rather than allowing users to potentially solve landmark problems. OpenAI researcher Noam Brown countered this, arguing that a user solving a major problem would be tremendous publicity. Others offered technical explanations, suggesting the termination could be due to standard safety mechanisms preventing infinite loops, or even a known bug in the GPT-5.6 Sol version that disrupts long-running sessions. The story highlights the practical challenges, technical limits, and broader strategic questions surrounding the use of advanced AI for open-ended, high-stakes research.

marsbit34 min fa

He Let GPT-5.6 Sol Run for 33 Hours Straight to Tackle Fermat's Last Theorem, Forcibly Terminated by the System

marsbit34 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片