Should You Chase Gold After It Nears $4680? Understanding the Three Major Driving Forces and Key Price Levels at Once

Pubblicato 2026-08-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-25

Introduzione

Spot gold once approached $4680, driven higher by technical breakthroughs, a weakening US dollar, concerns over US fiscal credibility, and geopolitical risks. However, after consecutive gains, pressures from overbought conditions and profit-taking are also accumulating. The area around $4700 is no longer a zone where one can ignore risks and chase the rally.

Spot gold has once again pushed the market to a new critical juncture. During the Asian session on August 25th, the price of gold traded high around $4670, approaching $4680 during the session; it had earlier touched $4680.65, while New York gold futures closed near $4710. The rapid ascent from breaking through $4600 to testing $4700 in just a few days has shifted the market's primary concern from "why is gold rising" to "can we still buy now."

This rally is not driven by a single piece of news. The simultaneous convergence of technical breakthroughs, a weaker US dollar, concerns over US fiscal credibility, and geopolitical safe-haven demand has aligned trend-following funds, safe-haven capital, and long-term allocation funds. However, the persistence of the drivers for higher prices does not mean any price level is suitable for buying. The closer gold gets to $4700, the more the short-term risk-reward ratio needs to be recalculated.

Technical Breakthrough Triggers Follow-through Buying

Gold's earlier breakthrough of the 200-day moving average around $4513, followed by its consolidation above the $4600 psychological level, typically triggers trend-following buying for algorithmic funds and technical traders. This also forces short sellers who previously bet on a decline to cover their positions, leading to accelerated price gains in a short period.

However, technical buying has a distinct characteristic: it can arrive quickly and leave just as fast. Following consecutive gains, daily indicators are already in overbought territory. The $4675 to $4700 zone is also an area where psychological resistance aligns with short-term technical pressure. If fresh buying momentum fails to keep pace and early longs take profits, a rapid pullback of tens or even hundreds of dollars could occur.

US Dollar and US Fiscal Risks Emerge as a Second Major Theme

The recent weakness in the US dollar has reduced the cost for non-US dollar investors to purchase gold, serving as the most direct macro tailwind for the gold price. More notably, following the US Treasury's expansion of long-term bond buybacks, the market has reignited discussions on US debt and fiscal sustainability. Even as long-term US Treasury yields subsequently rebounded, gold maintained its strength, indicating that some funds are trading not just on "lower yields" but also on hedging against US dollar credibility and government borrowing risks.

ING commodity strategist Ewa Manthey believes support comes from a combination of a weaker US dollar, falling short-term yields, inflows back into gold ETFs, and continued central bank purchases. However, this logic also has a flip side: if inflation reignites and the Fed signals potential further rate hikes, a synchronized rebound in US Treasury yields and the US dollar would increase the holding cost for gold. The premium gained from fiscal concerns could also be overwhelmed by short-term selling pressure.

Geopolitical Safe-Haven Demand Continues to Add Premium, But It's Not the Only Factor

Expanded US sanctions on Iran-related entities and sectors have made Middle East tensions a renewed safe-haven catalyst for gold. When geopolitical risks escalate, funds typically increase their gold allocations; if tensions ease, this related premium could also be quickly unwound.

Oil prices are a variable that can easily be overlooked moving forward. High oil prices can, on one hand, intensify geopolitical tensions and stagflation fears, supporting gold. On the other hand, they could also re-accelerate US inflation, forcing the Fed to maintain a hawkish stance. In other words, rising oil prices are not always a one-way positive for gold; the ultimate impact depends on whether the market is more concerned about safe-haven demand or more worried about rate hikes.

$4600 Acts as the Short-Term Bull-Bear Line

Looking at the current structure, $4675 to $4680 represents the first short-term resistance, while $4700 is a significant psychological barrier. A decisive break above could open the path towards the $4719 to $4724 zone. On the downside, initial support is seen at $4594 to $4600. If the price can hold above this area upon a retest, it would indicate the previous breakout is transforming into support, suggesting the bullish trend remains intact.

If $4600 is lost, the next support lies around $4551 to $4556. A further break below this zone would signal a shift from a normal high-level consolidation to a deeper correction. For those considering chasing the rally, the key is not to guess the exact top but to first identify which price level, if breached, would necessitate a reassessment of the original bullish thesis.

This week's US core PCE data and remarks from Fed officials at Jackson Hole could serve as triggers for the next wave of volatility. Cooling inflation and dovish-leaning policy rhetoric would help gold maintain its breakout gains. Conversely, any unexpectedly hawkish signals could propel a rebound in the US dollar and yields. While medium-term support for gold remains, the area near $4700 has entered a zone sensitive to both news and positioning. Waiting for the data to clear and for the $4600 support to be confirmed holds more reference value than merely focusing on the extent of the upside move.

Letture associate

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit4 min fa

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit4 min fa

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

A Bitcoin Core developer, John Atack, who has lived in El Salvador since 2022, shared a concerning anecdote about Bitcoin adoption in the country. While dining at El Zonte, a region known as "Bitcoin Beach," he paid with Bitcoin and was told it was the first such payment the establishment had received in a month. Staff explained Bitcoin payments, once common, have now virtually disappeared, with nearly all customers using cards. An employee even declined a Bitcoin tip, stating she had forgotten how to use her wallet and declaring "It's already dead." Atack emphasized this was a single observation but noted the employee had witnessed the payment evolution over three years. His comments sparked mixed reactions. Some disputed his experience, with one user confirming successful Bitcoin payments in the same area. However, Bitcoin reporter Juan Galt acknowledged an underlying "economic problem," arguing that expecting price appreciation makes using Bitcoin for everyday transactions counterintuitive to economic incentives needed for a circular crypto economy. Despite the concerning report, Atack also reflected that El Salvador remains a global leader in cryptocurrency adoption and progressive legislation, sometimes causing locals to take these advancements for granted. The story highlights the ongoing challenges of mainstream Bitcoin adoption for daily commerce, even in pioneering nations.

cryptonews.ru7 min fa

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

cryptonews.ru7 min fa

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, titled "Do You Even Crypto, Bro? Cryptocurrencies in Household Finance," reveals that Bitcoin and other crypto assets are less understood than other financial assets in US households. The primary reasons for not owning crypto are a lack of knowledge and the perception that it is a poor investment. Even among owners, the main motivations are profit-seeking and portfolio diversification rather than an understanding of the underlying technology's benefits, such as independence from banks. The research found that showing respondents Bitcoin's past 12-month performance increased their desired portfolio allocation by about 47%, indicating investment decisions are driven more by recent returns than fundamental comprehension. Crypto gains are often treated like lottery winnings, leading to one-off luxury purchases rather than sustained increases in spending. While non-owners largely view crypto as high-risk, owners are somewhat less likely to do so, though they exhibit greater uncertainty about future returns compared to traditional assets like stocks or gold. This ambiguity about Bitcoin's nature and valuation contributes directly to its price volatility. The study concludes that this volatility will persist, but education efforts combined with price appreciation could convert today's uninformed non-owners into future Bitcoin holders.

cryptonews.ru9 min fa

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

cryptonews.ru9 min fa

Grain Prices Haven't Taken Off Yet, So Why Have Fertilizer Prices Risen First?

Fertilizer prices are rising ahead of a potential global food price surge, driven primarily by supply-side constraints rather than current agricultural demand. While a strong El Niño is forecast for late 2026, its impact is expected to be initially limited to specific crops like palm oil and rubber, not leading to immediate, broad-based grain shortages. The fertilizer market is currently propelled by its own dynamics: **Urea** faces domestic oversupply in China, with its price reliant on the potential to export to higher-priced international markets. **Phosphate fertilizers** are experiencing a rare "supply-led" cycle due to global sulfur shortages, shipping disruptions, and production cuts overseas, placing Chinese producers with integrated resources and export channels in a key position. **Potash** supply is tightening due to planned maintenance and production cuts at major global producers, underpinning its long-term resource scarcity narrative. Looking ahead to 2027, a prolonged El Niño could shift the market into a second phase of "demand-supply resonance." If extreme weather significantly impacts crop yields and global grain inventories, rising food prices and farmer income would boost fertilizer application demand. This potential demand surge, layered onto the existing supply constraints, could amplify the price cycle. The overarching theme is that **food security is redefining the strategic value of fertilizers**, particularly for resource-constrained phosphate and potash. Policy priorities balancing domestic supply guarantees with export opportunities, coupled with resource ownership and global supply chain access, are becoming critical determinants of profitability beyond short-term weather cycles.

marsbit12 min fa

Grain Prices Haven't Taken Off Yet, So Why Have Fertilizer Prices Risen First?

marsbit12 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片