Emission Shock: TRUMP, MELANIA lose 86–99% as circulating supply doubles in three months

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-10

Introduzione

New tokens like TRUMP and MELANIA have plummeted 86–99% in value as their circulating supply doubled within three months, according to Tokenomist data. The report highlights aggressive token emissions and expanding float as key factors causing severe price declines, despite initial hype. Examples include Layer (-99.7%), Melania (-98%), and GoPlus Security (-92%). Market liquidity has shifted toward major cryptocurrencies and real-world assets, leaving newer tokens vulnerable. Even projects with genuine utility, like GoPlus, suffered due to poor tokenomics. The analysis concludes that unsustainable emission schedules and weak supply control are primary drivers of post-launch price collapse.

Tokens launched in Q1, such as TRUMP and MELANIA, are facing extreme downside pressure despite early hype, according to fresh Tokenomist data. The data compared launch prices with current circulating supply and market performance.

In every case monitored, circulating float expanded aggressively while prices collapsed between 86% and 99% since launch.

Massive issuance, collapsing prices

The report highlights a steep increase in circulating supply across a group of newly launched assets, including Official Trump, Melania, Layer, Plume, GoPlus Security, and Bubblemaps.

In most cases, circulating float doubled within three months, placing continuous sell-pressure on secondary markets, causing emission shock.

For example:

  • Layer moved from 21% to 31% float and is down 99.7%
  • Melania expanded from 25% to 55% and is down 98%
  • GoPlus Security moved from 15% to 29% and is down 92%
  • Plume moved from 20% to 33% and is down 86%

While individual narratives differ, the market reaction follows a similar pattern: heavy token emissions combined with thin liquidity result in forced price discovery at sharply lower levels.

Liquidity concentration favors majors

The broad rotation into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and real-world asset tokens over recent months has left smaller new launches exposed to liquidity shortages.

With capital gravitating toward majors and RWAs, newer tokens have little structural demand to absorb new supply.

This pattern is typical in phases where liquidity becomes conservative and retail participation fades.

In such environments, emission schedules matter more than product fundamentals, and even genuine use cases may not be enough to protect a token from emission shock.

Surface-level demand isn’t enough

GoPlus Security stands out as a token linked to meaningful cybersecurity infrastructure, yet its price is still down over 92% from launch.

The data reinforces a consistent theme across past cycles: practical utility does not always translate to token value when tokenomics work against holders.

Market watchers attribute token design, vesting schedules, and aggressive post-launch float increases as the primary drivers of these drawdowns, rather than project quality alone.


Final Thoughts

  • Token design remains one of the strongest determinants of post-launch price behavior.
  • Until new projects prioritize sustainable emissions and tighter supply control, newly issued assets are likely to remain vulnerable to emission shock and long-term price suppression.

Letture associate

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail In December, silver became the standout performer in the precious metals market, surging from $40 to over $60 per ounce, hitting a historic high of $64.28 on December 12 before experiencing sharp declines. Year-to-date, silver rose nearly 110%, far outpacing gold’s 60% gain. The rally appears justified by fundamental factors: expectations of Fed rate cuts, strong industrial demand from solar, EV, and AI sectors, and declining global inventories. However, the surge lacks stability. Unlike gold, which is backed by central bank purchases, silver has almost no official reserves, making it an isolated asset with low market depth and high volatility. The real driver behind the price spike is a futures squeeze. The market structure shifted into prolonged futures premium (contango), indicating either extreme bullish sentiment or deliberate market manipulation. Physical delivery demands surged on exchanges like COMEX and LBMA, exposing the fragility of the paper silver system—where paper claims vastly exceed actual physical silver. JPMorgan, a key player historically accused of silver market manipulation, now controls nearly 43% of COMEX silver inventories and acts as the custodian for major silver ETFs. Its influence over physical supply and delivery eligibility adds to market instability. The situation reflects a broader loss of confidence in financialized assets. Investors and central banks are increasingly shifting toward physical holdings, moving away from paper claims. This trend, coupled with declining Western gold and silver inventories and rising Asian demand, signals a structural shift in monetary and commodity markets. In essence, the rules of the game are changing. When the music stops, those holding physical metal will have a chair—everyone else may be left standing.

marsbit47 min fa

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

marsbit47 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片