TON Sets September 1 Deadline For Legacy Bridge Shutdown

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-08-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-25

Introduzione

The TON Foundation will permanently decommission its legacy bridge (bridge-v3.ton.org) on September 1. Users holding wrapped TON on Ethereum or BNB Chain, or j-tokens like jUSDT on TON, must bridge these assets back to their native forms before the deadline to avoid losing access. The foundation emphasizes this is a planned infrastructure transition, not a security incident. Bridge shutdowns pose significant operational risk, as affected tokens can become difficult to redeem if users miss the migration window. The announcement highlights that wrapped assets depend on specific bridge infrastructure and require proper, official channels for unwinding. The TON Foundation urges users to follow its official instructions promptly, cautioning that such transition periods often attract phishing attempts. This decommissioning is part of ongoing infrastructure cleanup, and user action before September 1 is critical.

The TON Foundation has confirmed that its legacy bridge will be permanently decommissioned on September 1, setting a deadline for users holding wrapped TON and related bridge assets to move back to native forms.

The shutdown affects bridge-v3.ton.org, according to TON materials. Users holding Wrapped TON as an ERC-20 token on Ethereum or BNB Chain, or j-tokens such as jUSDT on TON, need to bridge assets back before the deadline to avoid losing access.

This is a planned infrastructure transition.

It should not be described as an exploit, emergency shutdown, or security failure unless official sources say otherwise.

TL;DR

  • TON’s legacy bridge will be decommissioned on September 1.
  • Wrapped TON and j-token users need to bridge assets back before the deadline.
  • The shutdown is planned and should not be framed as a hack.

Why Bridge Shutdowns Matter

Bridges are one of the most sensitive pieces of crypto infrastructure.

They connect assets across chains, but they also create operational risk. If a bridge is deprecated or shut down, users need clear instructions and enough time to move funds.

A missed deadline can be costly.

Tokens that depend on a bridge may become hard to redeem or move if users do not act before decommissioning. That is why bridge shutdown notices matter even when nothing has been hacked.

They are practical user-risk events.

Wrapped Assets Need Special Attention

Wrapped TON on Ethereum or BNB Chain is not the same as native TON.

A wrapped token usually depends on bridge infrastructure that locks or accounts for the native asset while issuing a representation on another chain. If that bridge is being retired, users need to unwind the wrapped position through the proper route.

The same logic applies to j-tokens on TON.

Users should follow official instructions, use the correct bridge interface, and avoid unofficial links or phishing attempts. Bridge transition periods often attract scammers because users are already expecting to move assets.

Planned Does Not Mean Unimportant

A planned shutdown can still create risk.

The risk is not necessarily technical failure. It is user coordination. Some holders may not see the announcement. Some may wait too long. Some may use the wrong interface. Some may misunderstand which assets are affected.

That is why the September 1 deadline is important.

TON’s ecosystem needs users to act before the legacy infrastructure is retired.

Why Networks Retire Bridges

Protocols may shut down old bridges for many reasons.

A bridge may be replaced by newer infrastructure, become expensive to maintain, no longer fit the ecosystem roadmap, or carry legacy risk the foundation no longer wants to support. Retiring old infrastructure can be healthy if the process is communicated clearly.

The key is migration.

Users need enough time and simple instructions to move assets safely.

What Comes Next

The next milestone is the September 1 deadline.

Until then, wrapped TON and j-token holders should confirm whether they are affected and use official TON channels to bridge assets back. After the deadline, access may become limited or impossible through the legacy route.

For TON, the shutdown is part of infrastructure cleanup.

For users, it is a deadline that should not be ignored.

This article is based on TON Foundation materials regarding the legacy bridge decommissioning.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

This report is based on information released in disclosures at primary source documentation.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main action required of users who hold Wrapped TON or j-tokens before September 1?

AUsers holding Wrapped TON on Ethereum or BNB Chain, or j-tokens like jUSDT on TON, need to bridge their assets back to their native forms before the September 1 deadline to avoid losing access to them.

QAccording to the article, how should the shutdown of TON's legacy bridge be described?

AThe shutdown should be described as a planned infrastructure transition. It should not be framed as an exploit, emergency shutdown, or security failure.

QWhy are bridge shutdown notices important, even when there has been no hack?

ABridge shutdown notices are important because they represent a practical user-risk event. If users do not move their assets before a bridge is decommissioned, the tokens that depend on that bridge may become hard to redeem or move, which can be costly.

QWhat is a key risk associated with a planned bridge shutdown, as mentioned in the article?

AA key risk is user coordination. The risk is not necessarily technical failure, but rather that some holders may not see the announcement, wait too long, use the wrong interface, or misunderstand which assets are affected.

QWhat are some reasons why a network like TON might retire an old bridge?

AA network may retire an old bridge because it is being replaced by newer infrastructure, it has become expensive to maintain, it no longer fits the ecosystem roadmap, or it carries legacy risks the foundation no longer wants to support.

Letture associate

Billionaire Druckenmiller Considers U.S. Treasury's Bond Buyback Plan a Mistake

Billionaire investor Stanley Druckenmiller criticizes the U.S. Treasury's plan to increase purchases of long-term bonds as a mistake. The Treasury announced it would double its buyback amount for bonds with 10- to 30-year maturities from $2 billion to $4 billion. While this move, alongside other factors, boosted high-risk assets like Bitcoin, Druckenmiller argues the intervention failed to achieve its goals of lowering bond yields and slowing the growth of national debt. Druckenmiller contends the bond market was functioning properly without liquidity issues, and rising yields were justified by fundamentals like high inflation, low unemployment, and a massive budget deficit. He warns that artificially suppressing yields removes market pressure on Congress to address fiscal deficits and sets a dangerous precedent, inviting markets to constantly test any perceived "ceiling" protected by the Treasury. He likens the action to quantitative easing, which is inappropriate during high inflation. The investor believes the correct approach would be to let the market dictate yields, which could reasonably rise to 5.5%, and address them through deficit reduction. He concludes that governments lose when they defend prices against fundamental factors, and artificially suppressing interest rates only amplifies future risks. Following the announcement, the yield on 30-year bonds initially fell but later recovered.

cryptonews.ru15 min fa

Billionaire Druckenmiller Considers U.S. Treasury's Bond Buyback Plan a Mistake

cryptonews.ru15 min fa

Ilya Delivers, Huang Jen-Hsun Bets 50 Billion on SSI, First Model Suspected to Launch This Week

Ilya Sutskever's Safe Superintelligence (SSI) lab, backed by a rumored $5 billion investment from NVIDIA granting exclusive access to next-gen systems, may release its first groundbreaking model as early as this week. Industry insiders are hinting at a major breakthrough from a non-major player, with some claiming AI will be "utterly transformed." The model is speculated to fundamentally differ from current large language models like ChatGPT. Instead of relying on massive, static pre-training and ever-larger context windows, SSI's approach reportedly centers on **Test-Time Training (TTT)**. This would allow the model to **update its own internal weights in real-time** as it processes information, effectively "learning on the fly" and internalizing new knowledge like a human, rather than just referencing it from a large prompt. This aligns with Ilya Sutskever's long-stated vision of moving beyond the "pre-training" and "scaling" era. He envisions superintelligence not as a monolithic, pre-loaded database, but as an adaptive, "infinitely curious 15-year-old genius" capable of continual learning through interaction. SSI's strategy has been focused solely on this goal of "safe superintelligence" through efficient continual learning and alignment, explaining its prior silence. If successful, this model could disrupt the entire AI industry, challenging the current reliance on vast compute resources for training and the business models built around context windows. It suggests that core technological leaps, not just financial scale, remain decisive in the AI race.

marsbit1 h fa

Ilya Delivers, Huang Jen-Hsun Bets 50 Billion on SSI, First Model Suspected to Launch This Week

marsbit1 h fa

Demand Test: Bitcoin Whales Earn Record $1.2 Billion, Ethereum Holders Return to Profitability

In just three days after Bitcoin's price recovery, new Bitcoin whales have realized over $1.2 billion in profit, marking the largest profit-taking event for this cohort on record according to CryptoQuant. The peak occurred on August 20 with roughly $614 million, setting a daily record. Analysts note this selling pressure began after Bitcoin rose above the realized price of short-term whales, which was around $68,900. With Bitcoin trading near $77,700 on August 23, these whales were sitting on an average profit of about 12.8%. The market recovery allowed investors who were previously at breakeven or at a loss to lock in gains. CryptoQuant described the situation as a key test for Bitcoin demand; sustained prices above whale cost-basis with normalized profit-taking could signal strong new demand, while continued selling pressure could turn the rally into a mere break-even exit. Simultaneously, large Ethereum holders have also returned to an unrealized profit zone following its rally, as noted by CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost. Current profit levels, however, remain relatively low and are not seen as creating significant selling pressure. The Unrealized Profit/Loss Ratio for different whale cohorts stands at 0.075 (for 1k-10k ETH holders), 0.16 (10k-100k ETH), and 0.38 (over 100k ETH). This marks a significant improvement from June, when these whales were in substantial unrealized loss, with Ethereum having risen over 65% since then. The increased profitability is viewed as a positive sentiment signal for the Ethereum market.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Demand Test: Bitcoin Whales Earn Record $1.2 Billion, Ethereum Holders Return to Profitability

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片