US Senate reminds of unresolved conflict of interest of Trump in crypto

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-20

Introduzione

A US senator has highlighted an unresolved conflict of interest concerning former President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency dealings as a remaining obstacle to passing the key market bill, the CLARITY Act. Senator Ruben Gallego, a key negotiator, stated that multiple ethics provision proposals were sent to Trump without effective response. At a White House event on August 19th, Trump urged Congress to pass the bill, after which Bitcoin's price rose to $70,000. Concerns center on Trump's expanding crypto interests, including the TRUMP memecoin and his family's World Liberty Financial project, with reports showing nearly $1.5 billion in crypto earnings. Although Trump agreed in July to a ban on federal officials issuing or funding crypto assets, Democrats criticized its enforcement mechanism. A key procedural Senate vote is scheduled for September 15th, requiring 60 votes. Gallego stated that passing "smart ethics legislation" and resolving issues like stablecoin yield regulation and anti-illegal activity measures are necessary for the bill's advancement.

The US Senate has reminded that one of the obstacles to the adoption of the key local crypto market bill, the CLARITY Act, remains the conflict of interest of US President Donald Trump concerning his crypto business. Senator Democrat Ruben Gallego, a key participant in the negotiations on the bill, pointed out that several versions of the ethics provision have been sent to Trump, but to no avail, reports The Block.

"We sent proposals to the White House again and again, but we either received no response or a response after a long delay," said Gallego.

On Wednesday, August 19, at an event at the White House, where heads of departments and large crypto companies were invited, Trump stated that Congress needs to "take the next step" by approving the CLARITY Act, which has been postponed until autumn. Against the background of his statements, the Bitcoin rate rose to $70 thousand, updating the maximum since the beginning of summer.

The expansion of Trump's business interests in the crypto industry and the growth of income from them raise concerns among some congressmen. The focus has been on the meme coin Trump Official Trump (TRUMP) and the crypto project of his family, World Liberty Financial. According to financial statements published in June, Trump earned almost $1.5 billion from crypto.

In July, Trump agreed to a ban for civil servants on issuing and financing crypto assets. The text of the provision states that its enforcement will be carried out by the Department of Justice, and the provision itself will be in effect until 2029.

This formulation drew criticism from Democrats who said it was insufficient. The latest version suggests that these rules will be enforced by state attorneys general.

A preliminary procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the Senate is scheduled for September 15. To pass this procedure, the bill needs to receive 60 votes.

According to Gallego, for this to happen, "it is necessary to adopt competent legislation in the field of ethics, as well as resolve some unresolved issues." Among them are the regulation of stablecoin yields and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illegal activities.

"There are certain political forces that would prefer not to let this issue become a political problem both from the left and from the right. There are also those who want to govern the country, want to 'land this plane' and continue to implement innovations in the world," said Gallego.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main obstacle mentioned in the article regarding the passage of the CLARITY Act?

AThe main obstacle is the unresolved conflict of interest concerning US President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency business. Senator Ruben Gallego noted that several ethics provision proposals were sent to the White House but were either ignored or met with significant delays.

QAccording to the article, what was the market reaction to Trump's statements at the White House event on August 19?

AFollowing Trump's statements at the White House event urging Congress to approve the CLARITY Act, the price of Bitcoin rose to $70,000, reaching its highest level since the beginning of the summer.

QWhich specific Trump-related crypto assets have drawn the attention and concern of some members of Congress?

AThe crypto assets that have drawn concern are the Trump memecoin called Official Trump (TRUMP) and the Trump family's crypto project, World Liberty Financial. A financial report in June indicated Trump earned nearly $1.5 billion from crypto.

QWhat changes does the latest version of the ethics provision propose regarding enforcement, and why is this criticized?

AThe latest version of the ethics provision proposes that enforcement of the rules would be handled by state attorneys general. Democrats have criticized previous versions as insufficient, particularly a July agreement where enforcement was assigned to the Department of Justice.

QWhat are the two unresolved issues mentioned by Senator Gallego that need to be addressed for the CLARITY Act to pass the procedural vote?

ASenator Gallego stated that two unresolved issues are the regulation of stablecoin yield and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illicit activity. He also emphasized the need for sound ethics legislation.

Letture associate

JPMorgan Research Report Analysis: Moderna's INT Trial Meets Endpoints, but Market Already Priced In

On August 19, J.P. Morgan (JPM) published a research report analyzing Moderna's recent Phase III trial success for its Individualized Neoantigen Therapy (INT), developed in partnership with Merck, in adjuvant melanoma. The trial met its primary endpoint of significantly improved recurrence-free survival and the key secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival. While JPM acknowledged the strong clinical value of these results, particularly the prevention of distant metastasis, the bank stated that this success was widely anticipated, with an 85% prior probability of success, and is already reflected in Moderna's current market valuation. Following the announcement, Moderna's stock rose in pre-market trading. However, JPM maintained its Underweight rating and $40 price target, implying approximately 36% downside from the current price of ~$63. The core rationale is that the success in adjuvant melanoma, a relatively small market in immuno-oncology, is fully priced in. Moderna's future valuation hinges entirely on INT's ability to demonstrate similar efficacy across broader cancer indications. JPM's valuation model incorporates only a modest risk-adjusted value (~$3/share) for the melanoma approval. Approximately $15/share of its target price is attributed to INT's potential in other cancer types. The report identifies upcoming data readouts in non-melanoma cancers (e.g., lung, head & neck, renal) as the critical variable that will determine the platform's ultimate value. Upside risks include better-than-expected data in these new indications, while downside risks involve clinical failures, regulatory delays, or commercial underperformance. In conclusion, JPM views the pre-market stock move as driven by short covering and trading sentiment rather than a fundamental re-rating. The bank remains bearish, arguing that Moderna must now prove INT's efficacy as a platform technology beyond melanoma to justify its current market cap.

marsbit11 min fa

JPMorgan Research Report Analysis: Moderna's INT Trial Meets Endpoints, but Market Already Priced In

marsbit11 min fa

Treasury Department Directly Intervenes to Suppress Long-Term Interest Rates

The article discusses the U.S. Treasury's recent direct intervention to suppress long-term bond yields through buyback operations. While distinct from traditional Yield Curve Control (YCC), this move is interpreted as direct government intervention in its own financing costs. The author emphasizes the short-term tactical nature of this action and contrasts it with the Federal Reserve's upcoming, potentially divergent, policy stance at Jackson Hole. The core issue is framed as a long-term U.S. strategic dilemma: managing high deficit levels. The analysis argues that deficit reduction cannot realistically come from spending cuts or traditional industries, but must rely on achieving higher economic growth driven by technological breakthroughs. Current monetary tightening, while possibly curbing yields and inflation in the short term, is seen as potentially counterproductive to this necessary long-term investment in technology and supply chain resilience. The piece draws historical parallels, placing the current intervention between the 2000-2002 Treasury buybacks (for liquidity) and larger-scale Fed-led "Operation Twist" maneuvers. The effectiveness of the Treasury's action is deemed limited without Federal Reserve cooperation, which would signify a more significant policy shift. Ultimately, the author views such technical, bureaucratic interventions as treating symptoms rather than the underlying disease of the U.S. economy's structural challenges and "K-shaped" divergence. The conclusion suggests that sustained yield suppression by the Fed, combined with specific geopolitical outcomes, could serve as a catalyst for a more profound discussion on broader U.S. and dollar trajectory.

marsbit11 min fa

Treasury Department Directly Intervenes to Suppress Long-Term Interest Rates

marsbit11 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片