Trump Presses Congress To Pass Crypto Market Structure Bill ‘ASAP’

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-04

Introduzione

President Donald Trump has publicly urged Congress to pass the CLARITY Act, a comprehensive crypto market structure bill, "ASAP." In a Truth Social post, he accused the banking industry of undermining both the pending legislation and the previously signed GENIUS Act, which deals with stablecoins. Trump warned that failure to pass the bill could cede U.S. leadership in crypto to other countries like China and argued that Americans should benefit from the financial opportunities digital assets provide. He called for cooperation between banks and the crypto industry. Legislative progress on the bill has stalled due to disputes between these groups, with a key Senate committee now targeting a markup session for late March.

President Donald Trump has publicly addressed the legislative impasse surrounding the CLARITY Act, the long-debated crypto market structure bill that has yet to reach his desk for final approval.

The delay, according to ongoing discussions in Washington, stems largely from disagreements between the banking industry and crypto representatives, particularly over provisions tied to stablecoin rewards.

Trump Says Banks Threaten Stablecoin Law

In a post shared Tuesday on Truth Social, Trump sharply criticized the banking sector, accusing it of attempting to weaken both the broader crypto framework and a separate stablecoin measure he signed into law last year — the GENIUS Act.

“The Genius Act is being threatened and undermined by the Banks, and that is unacceptable — We are not going to allow it,” Trump wrote. He argued that passing comprehensive market structure legislation is urgent, adding, “The U.S. needs to get Market Structure done, ASAP. Americans should earn more money on their money.”

The President also claimed that financial institutions, despite reporting record profits, are working against policies designed to expand opportunities within the digital asset sector.

Trump warned that failing to finalize the CLARITY Act could weaken America’s position in the global crypto race. “We are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don’t get The Clarity Act taken care of,” Trump stated.

Calls For Banking-Crypto Cooperation

Trump further urged the banking sector to reach constructive agreements with the crypto industry, arguing that collaboration would serve the best interests of American consumers and businesses alike.

“This Industry cannot be taken from the People of America when it is so close to becoming truly successful,” he wrote, closing his message with a call for attention to the issue.

Legislatively, progress on the CLARITY Act has been uneven. The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced its portion of the bill in January of this year. However, broader movement has stalled.

The Senate Banking Committee had initially scheduled a markup in January, but that session was canceled amid the same disputes between banking representatives and crypto advocates that continue to complicate negotiations. The committee is now reportedly targeting a new markup date in mid-to-late March.

The daily chart shows the total digital asset market cap at $2.3 trillion as of this writing. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill that President Trump is urging Congress to pass?

AThe CLARITY Act.

QAccording to Trump, which industry is threatening and undermining the GENIUS Act?

AThe banking industry.

QWhat is one of the main reasons for the legislative delay of the CLARITY Act as mentioned in the article?

ADisagreements between the banking industry and crypto representatives, particularly over provisions tied to stablecoin rewards.

QWhat did Trump warn could happen to America's position in the global crypto race if the CLARITY Act is not finalized?

AIt could weaken America's position, and the crypto agenda could go to China and other countries.

QWhich Senate committee had initially scheduled a markup for the bill in January but canceled it?

AThe Senate Banking Committee.

Letture associate

Nanobot User Security Practice Guide: Guarding the Last Line of Defense for AI Permissions

A comprehensive security guide for Nanobot users emphasizes the critical importance of safeguarding AI agents with system-level permissions (shell execution, file access, network requests, etc.) against threats like prompt injection, supply chain poisoning, and unauthorized operations. It advocates a balanced, multi-layered defense strategy involving three key roles: - **End Users**: The final decision-makers responsible for managing API keys (secure storage, avoiding code repository exposure), enforcing channel access controls (using allowFrom whitelists), avoiding root privileges, minimizing email channel usage due to vulnerabilities, and deploying via Docker for isolation. - **AI Agent**: Enhanced with built-in "Self-Wakeup" security skills to autonomously audit intent, intercept malicious commands (e.g., `rm -rf`, shell injection), prevent sensitive data exfiltration (e.g., config files), and validate MCP skills. - **Deterministic Scripts**: Automatically perform static code analysis, hash-based tamper checks, security baseline verification, and nightly backups to ensure integrity and enable recovery. The guide underscores that no single layer is foolproof, but together they balance usability and security. It includes a disclaimer noting that these are best-effort measures and not a substitute for professional audits, with users bearing ultimate responsibility for risk management.

marsbit18 min fa

Nanobot User Security Practice Guide: Guarding the Last Line of Defense for AI Permissions

marsbit18 min fa

Ondo, xStocks, Hyperliquid 'Three Kingdoms': Who is Building the 'Foundation' of Future Finance?

This article analyzes three distinct approaches to on-chain tokenization of traditional assets like stocks and ETFs: Ondo Finance, xStocks (by Backed Finance, now Kraken-owned), and Hyperliquid's HIP-3. Ondo Finance employs an institutional-grade, indirect tokenization model. An offshore SPV holds the underlying stocks, issuing on-chain structured notes that represent economic exposure but not legal ownership. It features atomic settlement, instant minting/redemption, and requires KYC for accredited non-US investors. xStocks targets the retail market with a multi-chain, composable model. Similar to Ondo, it uses a 1:1 backed debt instrument structure (tracking certificates) issued by a Jersey-based SPV. It emphasizes self-custody, ease of access with no specific KYC for trading, and integrates a novel "xChange" engine to bridge TradFi liquidity into DeFi. Hyperliquid's HIP-3 offers a fundamentally different, permissionless model for creating perpetual futures markets on any asset. It requires no underlying custody of assets. Instead, it provides synthetic price exposure through oracle-fed perpetual contracts, allowing high leverage and 24/7 trading. It functions as a decentralized infrastructure layer for market creators. The piece concludes that these protocols are not in direct competition but serve different purposes: Ondo and xStocks offer economic ownership and redemption, while Hyperliquid provides leveraged synthetic trading. The common thread is expanding access and composability for on-chain users.

marsbit31 min fa

Ondo, xStocks, Hyperliquid 'Three Kingdoms': Who is Building the 'Foundation' of Future Finance?

marsbit31 min fa

Lobster Key 11 Questions: The Most Easy-to-Understand Breakdown of OpenClaw Principles

"OpenClaw Demystified: A Beginner's Guide to AI Agent Principles" explains the popular OpenClaw AI assistant by breaking down its core functions into 11 key questions. The article first clarifies that the underlying large language model is merely a "text prediction engine" with no real understanding, memory, or senses. OpenClaw acts as a "shell" around this model, creating the illusion of memory by appending massive prompts containing its personality files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, USER.md) and the entire conversation history before each interaction. This mechanism is why it's "expensive"—each query processes thousands of tokens of context, not just the latest message. A core differentiator is tool use. The model itself only outputs text; OpenClaw parses this output for specific structured commands (e.g., `[Tool Call] Read("file.txt")`) and executes the corresponding action (reading the file) locally on the user's machine. This allows it to act, not just advise. For complex tasks, it can even write and run its own Python scripts, a powerful but dangerous capability. To manage limited context windows and complex tasks, OpenClaw uses sub-agents. A main agent can spawn sub-agent to handle a sub-task and return a summarized result, preventing the main context from being overloaded. Crucially, sub-agents cannot spawn their own to avoid infinite loops. Unlike standard chatbots, OpenClaw is proactive due to its heartbeat mechanism, which periodically prompts the model to check for tasks. It can also "sleep" via cron jobs to wait for long-running tasks, saving resources. The guide ends with critical security warnings. OpenClaw has extensive local access, making it a significant risk. It can malfunction (e.g., deleting emails uncontrollably) or fall victim to prompt injection attacks, where malicious input from the web is mistaken for a user's command. The strong recommendation is to run it on a dedicated, isolated "sacrificial" computer with minimal permissions and mandatory human confirmations for destructive actions.

Odaily星球日报41 min fa

Lobster Key 11 Questions: The Most Easy-to-Understand Breakdown of OpenClaw Principles

Odaily星球日报41 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片