Crypto Clarity At Standstill In Congress, Says Fed Governor On Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated that progress on the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, has stalled in Congress due to disagreements over key issues. The main points of contention include stablecoin yield provisions and the Fed's proposed "skinny" master accounts. Crypto advocates argue that yield-bearing stablecoins promote adoption and competition, while banking groups oppose them, warning of potential deposit outflows from traditional banks. Additionally, the White House has scheduled a meeting to address tensions between crypto firms and banks. The Fed aims to propose regulations for skinny master accounts by the fourth quarter of this year.

Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Christopher Waller said on Monday that progress on the long‐anticipated crypto market structure legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, appears to have stalled in Congress.

His remarks come as lawmakers remain divided over key issues, most notably stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve’s proposal for so‐called “skinny” master accounts, a topic earlier highlighted by Crypto In America.

Stablecoin Yield Fight Fuels CLARITY Act Stalemate

Waller’s comments quickly drew reaction from market observers. Crypto analyst MartyParty noted on X that the governor’s assessment reflects the ongoing deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act.

According to MartyParty, the delay is not accidental. He argued that resistance from the banking sector has intensified, particularly around the treatment of stablecoin yields and rewards.

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms such as exchanges and digital wallets should be allowed to offer interest‐like returns or incentives on stablecoins held by users.

Crypto industry advocates contend that yield‐bearing stablecoins encourage adoption, improve efficiency, and increase competition in the payments market. Banking groups, however, strongly oppose this view.

They argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, warning that higher returns—often in the range of 3% to 5% or more, compared with near‐zero yields on many bank accounts—could trigger massive deposit outflows.

In MartyParty’s assessment, banks are concerned that passage of the CLARITY Act could move trillions of dollars onto crypto‐based payment rails, breaking what he described as the banking sector’s “closed‐loop system” and putting pressure on long‐established profit models.

Crypto And Banks Head Back To White House

Amid rising tensions, MartyParty also reported that the White House has scheduled a second meeting for Tuesday, February 10, aimed at easing friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over stablecoin yield payments.

The meeting is expected to include senior policy officials rather than company chief executives, along with representatives from banking and crypto trade associations.

Another major point of contention is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account model. Under this framework, eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

The debate around skinny accounts became especially clear through 44 comment letters submitted to the Federal Reserve. Crypto firms and industry groups generally expressed support, while banking organizations responded with caution or outright opposition.

Banking groups raised concerns about oversight and risk. The American Bankers Association (ABA) warned that many entities likely to qualify for payment accounts lack a long‐term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards.

Governor Waller indicated that he hopes the Federal Reserve will be able to publish proposed regulations for skinny master accounts in the fourth quarter of this year.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.35 trillion as of Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in Congress, according to the article?

AThe main reason is the ongoing deadlock over key issues, particularly the dispute around stablecoin yield provisions and the Federal Reserve's proposal for 'skinny' master accounts.

QWhy do banking groups oppose the idea of stablecoin yields?

ABanking groups argue that stablecoin yields pose a direct challenge to traditional bank deposits, as higher returns (often 3% to 5% or more) compared to near-zero yields on many bank accounts could trigger massive deposit outflows and threaten their established profit models.

QWhat is the purpose of the White House meeting scheduled for February 10th?

AThe White House meeting aims to ease friction between cryptocurrency firms and banks over the contentious issue of stablecoin yield payments.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account model?

AThe 'skinny' master account model is a framework where eligible fintech and crypto firms would be granted limited access to the Fed’s payment systems without receiving full banking privileges.

QWhat was a key concern raised by the American Bankers Association (ABA) regarding the 'skinny' master accounts?

AThe ABA warned that many entities likely to qualify for these payment accounts lack a long-term supervisory track record and are not subject to consistent federal safety standards, raising concerns about oversight and risk.

Letture associate

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

The article discusses Backpack's innovative tokenomics model, which challenges conventional practices in the cryptocurrency industry. Unlike typical projects where teams and venture capitalists (VCs) receive immediate token allocations, Backpack allocates 100% of liquid tokens to users at TGE. The remaining 37.5% of tokens, traditionally reserved for teams and investors, are locked in a corporate vault and tied to the company’s eventual IPO. This structure ensures that internal stakeholders can only benefit after a successful IPO, with an additional one-year lock-up period post-IPO to prevent early sell-offs. Backpack’s approach emphasizes long-term alignment with user interests and project sustainability. The token distribution prioritizes community incentives, with 25% of tokens released at TGE to reward users and NFT holders. Future unlocks are tied to product milestones, ensuring that new token releases contribute more value to the ecosystem than they dilute the token’s price. Additionally, Backpack prioritizes regulatory compliance, currently serving only 48% of global regions to adhere to legal standards. Its goal is to build a hybrid platform integrating crypto and traditional financial services. Market reactions are mixed: Backpack is reportedly seeking funding at a $1 billion valuation, but predictions about its token FDV reflect uncertainty. Ultimately, Backpack’s model represents a shift toward transparency, long-term value, and user-centric growth in Web3.

marsbit7 min fa

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

marsbit7 min fa

Wall Street's Top Quantitative Firm Jump Trading Enters the Prediction Market, Is the Era of Retail Investors Over?

Wall Street quantitative trading giant Jump Trading is entering the prediction market sector through strategic partnerships with leading platforms Kalshi and Polymarket. In exchange for providing liquidity, Jump will receive equity stakes in both companies—a fixed share in Kalshi and a performance-based stake in Polymarket tied to its U.S. trading volume. Prediction markets have faced persistent liquidity challenges, with platforms often experiencing shallow order books and wide bid-ask spreads outside of major events. While Kalshi previously engaged SIG as a market maker and Polymarket relied on decentralized incentives and algorithmic traders, both platforms have struggled to maintain stable, deep liquidity consistently. The equity-for-liquidity model aligns incentives: platforms gain access to Jump’s sophisticated, low-latency market-making capabilities, while Jump positions itself to benefit from the sector’s growth—Kalshi and Polymarket are valued at approximately $11B and $9B, respectively. Market making in prediction markets offers potential profits from spreads, incentives, and arbitrage, but it also carries significant risks, including event-driven volatility, limited hedging options, and regulatory uncertainty. While Jump’s advanced infrastructure and cross-asset experience may allow it to capture alpha and leverage equity upside, smaller players face high barriers to entry. The move signals a maturation of the prediction market space, with institutional participation likely to improve liquidity but also centralize influence among top-tier firms.

marsbit10 min fa

Wall Street's Top Quantitative Firm Jump Trading Enters the Prediction Market, Is the Era of Retail Investors Over?

marsbit10 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片