SEC Crypto Task Force Receives New Submissions on Self-Custody and DeFi Rules

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-21

Introduzione

The U.S. SEC Crypto Task Force has received two new public submissions addressing key regulatory issues in digital assets, including self-custody rights and DeFi oversight. One submission, referencing Louisiana’s HB 488 law, advocates for federal crypto market regulations that include registration requirements, transparency, and anti-fraud measures, while cautioning against overly broad exemptions. Another, from the Blockchain Association, requests SEC guidance on whether entities involved in tokenized equity and DeFi trading should be classified as dealers under the Securities Exchange Act, suggesting adaptations to traditional broker-dealer frameworks for smart contract-based trading. These inputs come amid ongoing congressional negotiations on the CLARITY Act, which seeks to clarify digital asset regulations, with industry stakeholders actively engaging in the debate around investor protection and innovation.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Crypto Task Force has received two new written submissions to its public input page, which have once again highlighted important issues in digital asset regulation, such as self-custody rights and the regulatory status of decentralised finance (DeFi).

One of the proposals, from a Louisiana resident named DK Willard, references the Louisiana HB 488 law, which protects the state’s residents’ right to control their own digital assets. The proposal states that the upcoming federal law on the structure of the crypto market should contain proper registration requirements, transparency, and robust anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions. The proposal warns that too wide-reaching exemptions at the federal level could permit developers or platforms to circumvent investor protections.

The second observation is from the Blockchain Association Trading Firm Working Group, which urges the SEC to issue guidance on whether firms engaging in tokenized equity and DeFi trading on their own behalf should or should not be considered dealers subject to registration under the Securities Exchange Act. The comment suggests that the conventional broker-dealer framework applicable in traditional markets may need to be adapted to accommodate smart contract settlement and trading without necessarily requiring dealer registration.

These comments were posted on the SEC’s “Written Input” page for the Crypto Task Force, which is intended to allow stakeholders to share their views that may help shape the federal approach to digital assets.

Context Within Ongoing Regulatory Debate

The timing of these new filings is as Congress is in the middle of negotiations on the federal crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, which aims to provide clarity on the regulatory framework and update investor protection regulations for digital assets. There have been debates among industry participants and regulators on matters such as stablecoin regulation, DeFi liquidity, and innovation vs. regulation.

A senior crypto advisor to the White House, Patrick Witt, has urged a compromise in order to move the CLARITY Act in a period of time in which the Republican Party controls both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and in which the Trump administration is still in power. Industry leaders, such as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have been part of the process.

The recent filings with the SEC Crypto Task Force indicate the ongoing interest of the industry in federal regulation of digital assets, in particular with respect to self-custody rights and the nature of DeFi trading activity. As federal legislative development progresses and various parties make their voices heard, these perspectives may inform how regulatory frameworks balance investor protection and innovation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Galaxy Digital Bets on Balanced Strategy With New $100M Crypto-Linked Hedge Fund

TagsDeFiSEC

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main issues highlighted in the new submissions to the SEC Crypto Task Force?

AThe two main issues highlighted are self-custody rights and the regulatory status of decentralized finance (DeFi).

QWhich state law was referenced in the proposal from DK Willard, and what right does it protect?

AThe proposal referenced Louisiana HB 488 law, which protects the state's residents' right to control their own digital assets.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association Trading Firm Working Group urge the SEC to provide guidance on?

AIt urges the SEC to issue guidance on whether firms engaging in tokenized equity and DeFi trading on their own behalf should be considered dealers subject to registration under the Securities Exchange Act.

QWhat is the name of the federal crypto market structure bill currently being negotiated in Congress?

AThe federal crypto market structure bill is called the CLARITY Act.

QAccording to the article, what is the White House senior crypto advisor Patrick Witt urging to help move the CLARITY Act forward?

APatrick Witt is urging a compromise to move the CLARITY Act forward during a period of Republican control of both the House and Senate and while the Trump administration is still in power.

Letture associate

Rhythm X Zhihu Co-host Web4.0 Theme Event: When AI Agent Takes Over On-Chain Permissions

Most discussions about Web 4.0 miss the point. The real question is not whether it is a marketing trend, but rather: who is gaining control over the underlying permissions of the internet? Historically, each iteration of the web has involved a transfer of authority downward: Web 1.0 was read-only; Web 2.0 allowed users to write but platforms owned the data; Web 3.0 enabled true ownership through on-chain assets and private keys. Web 4.0 continues this trend, but the transfer is not to users—it is to AI Agents. The current infrastructure is human-centric, designed around human limitations like attention span and memory. But AI Agents don’t need intuitive UIs, password resets, or sleep. This creates a core tension: an internet built for humans is now being used by entities without human constraints. Two key shifts are underway: the decline of traditional front-end interfaces (replaced by API-driven machine communication) and the replacement of human-centric identity systems (like passwords) with granular, on-chain permissions. A critical enabler is crypto infrastructure. AI can make rapid decisions but lacks independent payment channels and asset sovereignty. Crypto fills this gap. Platforms like Hyperliquid offer 24/7 markets, ideal for non-stop Agent operation. When Agents control wallets and private keys, they can both decide and execute—forming complete economic entities. The real narrative of Crypto × AI isn’t just buzzword synergy—it’s the convergence of complementary infrastructures. The deeper shift is not which products will succeed, but how the rules of economic systems will change when AI becomes a primary on-chain participant, operating at scale and speed beyond human capability.

marsbit3 h fa

Rhythm X Zhihu Co-host Web4.0 Theme Event: When AI Agent Takes Over On-Chain Permissions

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片