SEC ’eased up on’ 60% of crypto enforcement cases under Trump: Report

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-15

Introduzione

Under the Trump administration, the SEC has reportedly dismissed or dropped approximately 60% of its cryptocurrency-related enforcement cases, a significantly higher rate than for other securities law violations. The New York Times report highlighted high-profile cases like those against Ripple and Binance, noting the agency is no longer actively pursuing cases against firms with Trump ties. The SEC denied political influence, attributing the shift to legal and policy reasons. Trump-linked entities have expanded their crypto involvement, including memecoins and mining ventures. Meanwhile, the last Democratic commissioner, Caroline Crenshaw, is set to leave, having criticized the administration's softer crypto stance.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has dismissed cryptocurrency cases under the Trump administration at a significantly higher rate than those involving other aspects of securities laws.

According to a Sunday report from The New York Times, since US President Donald Trump took office in January, the SEC has paused, dropped investigations related to or dismissed about 60% of cases involving companies and projects in the cryptocurrency industry. The report cited high-profile cases, including the SEC’s lawsuits against Ripple Labs and Binance, adding that the financial regulator was “no longer actively pursuing a single case against a firm with known Trump ties.”

The SEC told The New York Times that political favoritism had “nothing to do” with its crypto enforcement strategy, and the shift to dismiss investigations and cases was for legal and policy reasons. The news outlet also noted that it had found no evidence suggesting that Trump had pressured the agency to drop investigations or cases.

“[T]he idea that the regulatory pivot on crypto over the last year is somehow because of the president’s personal interest, and not because the prior regulatory posture was absolutely insane,” said Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, in response to The New York Times report. ”[It] is dishonest framing that ignores 4 years of direct attacks by the actual partisans.”

Related: US SEC’s Crenshaw takes aim at crypto in final weeks at agency

Trump family entities have significantly expanded their involvement in the digital asset industry in 2025, with entities linked to the president or his family participating in several cryptocurrency-related projects, including World Liberty Financial, Trump’s memecoin, Official Trump (TRUMP) and the president’s sons’ Bitcoin (BTC) mining venture, American Bitcoin.

Remaining Democratic SEC commissioner set to leave agency in weeks

Though the SEC’s Paul Atkins will likely remain chair of the commission for years, the agency is set to lose the final Democratic member on its leadership after her term expired in 2024.

In January, Caroline Crenshaw is expected to depart the SEC, having served 18 months beyond the expiration of her initial term. At the time of publication, Trump had not announced any potential replacements for Crenshaw or for the other empty Democratic seat at the regulatory agency.

In contrast to Atkins and other Republican commissioners, Crenshaw has been publicly critical of the agency’s approach to digital assets under the Trump administration. In one of her final public appearances as the agency's commissioner last week, Crenshaw said loosening regulations on crypto could ”lead to more significant market contagion.”

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Letture associate

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbit9 min fa

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbit9 min fa

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

"Global AI Model Unicorn" Zhipu's stock surged nearly 30% in a single day, reaching a new market cap high. The catalyst was the launch of its GLM-5.1-highspeed API, boasting a generation speed of **400 tokens per second**, setting a new global benchmark. This speed, roughly 3-5 times faster than industry leaders like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude, is achieved **without compromising the full-scale model's capabilities**. In the era of AI Agents requiring dozens of self-calls, such latency reduction is critical, transforming speed from a system metric into a determinant of intelligence limits. The breakthrough stems from a three-layer technical overhaul: 1. **TileRT Inference Engine**: Compiles the entire model into a continuous, always-on computation pipeline using "Warp Specialization," minimizing GPU idle time by having different processor groups handle data loading, computation, and communication in parallel. 2. **Heterogeneous Parallelism for MLA**: To efficiently run the GLM-5.1 model using the MLA attention mechanism, TileRT employs a heterogeneous strategy. One GPU handles sparse indexing/routing, while the others perform dense computation, optimizing for MLA's unique workflow. 3. **ZCube Network Architecture**: Replaces the standard Spine-Leaf (ROFT) network topology with a flat, dual-group interconnect. This design creates a single optimal path between any two GPUs, eliminating network congestion at scale and reducing latency. The business impact is significant: a 15% increase in cluster throughput (free extra capacity), a 40.6% reduction in tail latency (improved stability), and a one-third cut in networking hardware costs. Long-term, this innovation challenges the dominance of NVIDIA's integrated hardware-software stack (GPU+NVLink+InfiniBand), potentially benefiting manufacturers of high-density Leaf switches and optical modules while lowering the software barrier for domestic AI chips like Huawei's Ascend. The innovation proves that more can be achieved with the same compute, reshaping the infrastructure beyond just GPUs.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

marsbit1 h fa

The Powell Era Concludes: Warsh Takes Over the Fed, What It Means for Global Finance and the Crypto Market?

The podcast discusses the implications of Jerome Powell's departure and Kevin Warsh's appointment as Federal Reserve Chair for global markets and crypto. It highlights a significant divergence between bond markets, which price in global tightening and persistent inflation, and equity markets, driven by AI hype—a disparity reminiscent of the dot-com bubble. The analysis introduces the "Bliss Trade" concept, a structural expectation of government stimulus during crises, which underpins risk asset valuations and currency debasement trades. Inflation is seen as sticky, driven by deglobalization and further complicated by geopolitical tensions, unlikely to fall quickly even if immediate crises subside. Powell's tenure is critiqued for misjudging inflation and overseeing the de-banking of crypto firms, despite defending Fed independence. Regarding crypto, Bitcoin is viewed as a macro asset and a hedge against currency debasement, but its current muted performance stems from competition with higher-beta assets like AI stocks. The potential Clarity Act is seen as more beneficial for Ethereum than Bitcoin, with concerns about tokenization innovation leading to pure speculation. A key warning signal is the widening gap between the market-cap-weighted and equal-weighted S&P 500 indices, suggesting underlying market fragility.

marsbit1 h fa

The Powell Era Concludes: Warsh Takes Over the Fed, What It Means for Global Finance and the Crypto Market?

marsbit1 h fa

Bidding Farewell to the 'Gray Gambling Game'! Polymarket Charges into the Compliance Track—How Will This Impact the Entire Crypto Industry?

From Gray to Regulated: How Polymarket’s Compliance Journey Reshapes Crypto The evolution of Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, illustrates a critical trend in crypto: innovative, high-value sectors ultimately integrate into regulatory frameworks. Founded in 2020, Polymarket quickly gained traction by leveraging low-cost Layer 2 blockchain technology for event-based trading, notably during the 2024 US presidential election where its markets outperformed traditional polls. However, its "build first, comply later" approach led to a 2022 CFTC enforcement action, resulting in a $1.4 million fine and a ban from the US market. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025 under a new US administration. Polymarket strategically acquired CFTC-licensed derivatives exchange QCX for $112 million, securing a regulated pathway back into the US. This move coincided with a regulatory reversal, as the CFTC withdrew a prior proposal to ban political event contracts. The platform’s successful "regulatory acquisition" strategy, avoiding a lengthy independent licensing process, highlights a viable compliance path for crypto-native projects. Its journey from regulatory target to a CFTC-recognized entity—bolstered by a major data partnership and investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)—signals the maturation of prediction markets from a "crypto novelty" into acknowledged financial infrastructure. The story underscores that genuine utility provides negotiating power with regulators and that embracing compliance does not necessarily mean sacrificing core technological advantages.

marsbit1 h fa

Bidding Farewell to the 'Gray Gambling Game'! Polymarket Charges into the Compliance Track—How Will This Impact the Entire Crypto Industry?

marsbit1 h fa

Here’s The 411 Behind The Famous $50 XRP Candle On Gemini In 2023

Amid ongoing discussions about XRP's price, crypto analyst CharuSan revisited the infamous "$50 XRP candle" that occurred on the Gemini exchange in 2023. This event, where XRP's price briefly spiked to $50, was widely speculated to be a glitch. However, CharuSan explained it was a real market event caused by catastrophic slippage. The relisting of XRP on Gemini left order books with very low liquidity. A market buy order worth approximately $37,000 consumed all available sell orders until it hit a single sell order placed at the $50 level, causing the dramatic price surge. CharuSan argues this incident mathematically demonstrates why large financial institutions cannot rely solely on on-demand liquidity, especially during high volume. To handle billion-dollar cross-border transfers without causing massive slippage and freezing the system, tier-1 banks must maintain their own deep, pre-funded, and dedicated XRP liquidity pools. The event underscores that managing large institutional volumes requires controlled, bank-held liquidity to prevent traders from losing control over market prices and transactions. At the time of the analysis, XRP was trading around $1.38.

bitcoinist2 h fa

Here’s The 411 Behind The Famous $50 XRP Candle On Gemini In 2023

bitcoinist2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures