Illicit Crypto Flows Shift Away From Centralized Exchanges

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

According to new research from Chainalysis, illicit crypto flows are increasingly shifting away from centralized exchanges due to improved compliance measures. Criminals are now fragmenting transactions and using decentralized tools such as DEXs, cross-chain bridges, and mixers to obscure fund movements. This complicates tracking and delays intervention. In response, analytics firms are enhancing behavioral analysis, focusing on wallet clusters and DeFi interactions. Law enforcement and regulators are also improving collaboration and standardization. Despite these challenges, the inherent transparency of blockchains continues to aid investigations. The ongoing evolution in both money laundering tactics and compliance technologies fuels a continuous arms race in the crypto industry.

Crypto launderers now move away from centralized exchanges and lean on decentralized tools to move funds, as revealed by new research from blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis. This is a result of improved compliance measures on the big trading exchanges, which can identify and freeze malicious transactions more quickly.

Current events in the industry, including updates on global crypto regulations and DeFi security events, illustrate the impact of regulation and enforcement on the behavior of the community in 2026. Criminal actors react to that pressure by exploring alternative routes.

Instead of sending stolen or illicit funds straight to large exchanges, bad actors now fragment transactions, route assets through decentralized protocols, and rely on cross-chain bridges. These methods complicate tracking and delay intervention.

DeFi Tools Replace Traditional Off-Ramps

Centralized exchanges were the main way out for crypto launders. But know-your-customer regulations and monitoring software limited this option. Now, darknet groups prefer decentralized exchanges, liquidity pools, and token swaps that don’t require direct supervision.

Another method of money laundering is using mixers and privacy services. They mix these services with fast chain-hopping techniques, which move funds between blockchains to make forensic analysis harder. This makes more noise and requires more in-depth analysis from compliance teams.

However, launderers also take advantage of smaller or newer platforms that have less strict controls. These platforms may not have the same monitoring infrastructure as top-tier platforms.

Analytics Firms Step Up Tracking

Blockchain analysis firms respond by improving their behavioral analysis. Instead of focusing on exchange inflows, they now examine wallet clusters, bridge transactions, and DeFi interaction patterns. These algorithms can identify malicious routing patterns even if employed by criminals who don’t use centralized infrastructure.

Companies like Chainalysis and blockchain explorers like Etherscan help investigators by providing information on the flow of transactions on the blockchain. Law enforcement agencies are now using these services to track stolen money.

Regulators are also working together. They are sharing information and advocating for a standardized reporting requirement for digital asset service providers. This makes it more difficult for criminals to find safe havens.

Compliance Arms Race Intensifies

This, in turn, fuels an endless arms race between the criminals and the compliance teams. With every advance in monitoring, the criminals resort to more sophisticated tactics. In this regard, analytics solutions improve machine learning algorithms and enable cross-chain visibility.

However, despite all these strategies, it is transparency that characterizes public blockchains. This is because law enforcement agencies are able to track transactions even after the first attempt at money laundering. The past few years have witnessed major confiscations, and these show that criminals are not able to escape detection completely.

The move away from centralized exchanges does not make it impossible to track transactions. Rather, it makes the technical aspect of the process more complicated and expensive for the criminals.

Outlook for the Industry

As the decentralized finance space continues to expand, the management of risk must keep pace. Platforms that implement compliance solutions right from the start can reduce their susceptibility to abuse while still maintaining the trust of their users. Innovation in analytics is also bound to play a critical role in shaping the effectiveness of law enforcement in combating crypto-related crimes.

The environment is one of rapid change, but one aspect of blockchain technology that has yet to change is its transparency. This continues to provide law enforcement with an advantage, even as the criminals evolve.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Prepares Mainnet Launch of ERC-8004 AI Agent Standard

TagsBlockchainChainalysiscryptocrimeDeFiMoney Laundering

Domande pertinenti

QWhy are crypto launderers shifting away from centralized exchanges according to the article?

ACrypto launderers are shifting away from centralized exchanges due to improved compliance measures on these platforms, which can identify and freeze malicious transactions more quickly. This has forced criminals to explore alternative routes like decentralized tools.

QWhat specific decentralized tools are criminals now favoring for moving illicit funds?

ACriminals are now favoring decentralized exchanges, liquidity pools, token swaps, cross-chain bridges, and mixers or privacy services to move illicit funds, as these methods complicate tracking and delay intervention.

QHow are blockchain analytics firms like Chainalysis adapting to these new money laundering techniques?

ABlockchain analytics firms are improving their behavioral analysis by examining wallet clusters, bridge transactions, and DeFi interaction patterns instead of just focusing on exchange inflows. They use advanced algorithms to identify malicious routing patterns even without centralized infrastructure.

QWhat advantage does the transparency of public blockchains provide in the fight against crypto crime?

AThe transparency of public blockchains provides law enforcement agencies with the ability to track transactions even after initial money laundering attempts. This characteristic has led to major confiscations and prevents criminals from escaping detection completely.

QWhat is the article's outlook on the future of combating crypto-related money laundering?

AThe article states that as DeFi expands, risk management must keep pace. Platforms implementing compliance solutions from the start can reduce abuse while maintaining user trust. Innovation in analytics will be critical for law enforcement, and blockchain's inherent transparency continues to give authorities an advantage.

Letture associate

"We Are Heartbroken by CEX": 4 Users Reveal Why They 'Defected' to Hyperliquid

"We Are Heartbroken by CEXs": Four Users Explain Why They Switched to Hyperliquid In 2025, Hyperliquid emerged as a major player in the perpetual futures DEX space. Founded and self-funded by Jeff, it achieved significant traction, at one point handling over 10% of Binance’s daily contract volume and dominating more than 70% of the perp DEX market. Four users shared their perspectives on why they moved from CEXs to Hyperliquid: - **User A (Web3 Researcher)**: Hyperliquid prioritizes transparency and user experience over decentralization. It functions like a CEX but with on-chain settlement, offering control and verifiable transactions. - **User B (Hyperliquid Enthusiast)**: Driven by profit, he found CEXs increasingly exploitative in 2024. Hyperliquid’s wealth effect, community culture, and successful token auctions attracted users and generated significant returns. - **User C (Airdrop Farmer)**: Hyperliquid’s substantial airdrop and sustainable revenue model stood out. Its appeal to international users (especially those restricted from regulated CEXs) and high referral rewards also contributed to growth. - **User D (Project Executive)**: The meme coin boom and low liquidity in traditional tokens forced him into leveraged trading. Hyperliquid’s unique community behavior (e.g., opposing CEX-listed tokens) created arbitrage opportunities. Hyperliquid’s success stems from its user-centric design, transparency, and strategic community building. External factors, including CEXs’ failures in fostering wealth creation and trust, further drove users toward decentralized alternatives. The platform’s rise highlights a shift in user preference toward链上 products when CEXs underdeliver.

marsbit38 min fa

"We Are Heartbroken by CEX": 4 Users Reveal Why They 'Defected' to Hyperliquid

marsbit38 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片