Crypto May No Longer Be Treated Like Penny Stocks Under SEC Plan

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-17

Introduzione

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed amending Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 to apply only to equity securities, a move that could significantly impact crypto market structure. The rule, historically used to prevent fraud in over-the-counter equity markets, would no longer broadly apply to other asset classes like cryptocurrencies. This change is seen as a meaningful shift away from forcing crypto into existing securities frameworks. By excluding crypto from these rules—originally designed for penny stocks—the SEC signals a more tailored regulatory approach. The proposal is open for public comment, reflecting the agency's growing willingness to treat crypto differently from traditional equities.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed narrowing Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 so that it applies only to equity securities, a technical change that could carry outsized significance for crypto market structure. For digital assets, the proposal signals a more tailored regulatory approach after years of trying to force crypto into frameworks built for traditional securities.

In a press release issued March 16, the SEC said Rule 15c2-11 has historically focused on preventing manipulative and fraudulent schemes in over-the-counter equity markets. The proposed amendment would revise the rule so it refers only to equity securities, rather than leaving room for broader application to other asset classes.

Quiet But Meaningful Win For Crypto

That matters because Rule 15c2-11 governs certain information gathering and review requirements for broker-dealers that publish quotations for, or maintain a continuous quoted market in, securities in the OTC market. By explicitly tying the rule to equities, the SEC appears to be drawing a cleaner line around where those obligations begin and end.

SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins framed the move as a matter of regulatory fit rather than ideology. “Regulations should be appropriately tailored to fit the asset class to which they apply,” Atkins said. “This proposal would clarify regulatory obligations when publishing quotations and affirm what was always understood: Rule 15c2-11 applies to equity securities.”

For crypto market participants, the proposal reads as more than a drafting cleanup. Marty Bent, writing on X (@TFTC), argued that the shift quietly reverses the posture that defined much of the prior SEC era. “The SEC just proposed excluding crypto assets from OTC market rules that govern broker-dealer quotations. These are regulations originally designed for penny stocks and thinly traded equities.”

He went further, casting the amendment as a subtle but meaningful break from the agency’s past playbook. “This is a quiet but meaningful shift. Instead of forcing Bitcoin and crypto into existing securities frameworks, the SEC is explicitly carving it out. The rules being amended (Rule 15c2-11) dictate how broker-dealers can publish quotes for securities. By clarifying that crypto doesn’t fall under these requirements, the SEC is signaling it doesn’t view these assets through the same lens as traditional equities.”

That interpretation is likely to resonate because Rule 15c2-11 was never designed with digital assets in mind. Its original function was tied to OTC equities, particularly the kind of thinly traded names that have historically been vulnerable to quote manipulation and fraud. In that context, the SEC’s proposal does not create a bespoke crypto regime, but it does something nearly as important: it narrows the set of legacy securities rules that might otherwise be stretched to cover crypto by default.

Bent also contrasted the proposal with the enforcement-heavy approach associated with former Chair Gary Gensler. “Under Gensler, the approach was the opposite, force everything into existing rules, then sue when companies couldn’t comply. This is the regulatory posture flipping from ‘prove you’re not a security’ to ‘these rules weren’t built for you.’”

The proposal is now headed to the standard public process. The SEC said the release will be published on SEC.gov and later in the Federal Register, with a 60-day comment period beginning after Federal Register publication. That leaves room for revisions, but the message is already clear enough: the agency is increasingly willing to distinguish crypto from the infrastructure and assumptions of legacy equity markets.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.51 trillion.

Total crypto market cap must reclaim the 0.786 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main change proposed by the SEC regarding Rule 15c2-11?

AThe SEC has proposed narrowing Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 so that it applies only to equity securities, rather than having broader application to other asset classes like crypto.

QWhy is this proposal considered a significant shift for the crypto market?

AIt signals a more tailored regulatory approach, distinguishing crypto from traditional securities frameworks and reversing the previous posture of forcing crypto into existing rules designed for equities like penny stocks.

QHow did SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins justify the proposed amendment?

AHe framed it as a matter of regulatory fit, stating that regulations should be appropriately tailored to the asset class they apply to, and that the proposal clarifies Rule 15c2-11 was always understood to apply to equity securities.

QWhat does Marty Bent suggest about the SEC's change in approach compared to the Gary Gensler era?

ABent argues this shifts from an enforcement-heavy approach that forced crypto into existing rules and then sued for non-compliance, to a posture that acknowledges these rules weren't built for crypto assets.

QWhat is the next step for this SEC proposal after its announcement?

AThe proposal will go through a standard public process with a 60-day comment period after being published in the Federal Register, leaving room for potential revisions.

Letture associate

I Investigated 5 Crypto AI Projects That Raised Millions and Found...

The article investigates five recently funded crypto-AI projects that have raised millions despite having little to no functional product or product-market fit, highlighting a trend of crypto VCs pivoting to AI investments out of desperation. Key examples include: - **Derivio**: A former DEX rebranded as an "AI-native trading platform" that currently functions primarily as a meme coin sniping tool. Its promotional content was found to be AI-generated. - **Superpower**: An "agent revenue protocol" with a non-functional website and no visible product at the time of its undisclosed pre-seed round. - **Finrob**: A $3.9M-funded crypto research chatbot that merely aggregates existing data sources and free AI models. The platform was inaccessible during testing. - **PlutonAI**: A "DeFAI" platform that aims to let AI agents manage on-chain operations, a concept the author argues is becoming a solved problem. The platform was also inaccessible. - **Unicity**: A $3M-funded infrastructure project for an "Agentic Autonomous Internet," which remains a theoretical whitepaper with no testnet or live product. The author concludes that most crypto VCs are aware these projects lack substance but are investing in the "AI" narrative for liquidity and to gain exposure to the trend, as they are largely shut out of investing in top-tier, traditional AI companies. A few legitimate, product-based exceptions like RoboForce are noted, but they are the minority.

Odaily星球日报17 min fa

I Investigated 5 Crypto AI Projects That Raised Millions and Found...

Odaily星球日报17 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片