SEC’s Crypto Advocate Says Blockchain Code Is Protected By The Constitution

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-06-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-05

Introduzione

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce argued that publishing open-source blockchain code is a protected activity under the First Amendment and developers should not be automatically liable as securities intermediaries for how others use their software. She emphasized that liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not the tool creators. Her remarks reflect a broader regulatory shift at the SEC under Chair Paul Atkins, moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws, designed for traditional intermediaries, apply to decentralized systems. Recent SEC guidance also suggested some platforms accessing decentralized protocols may not qualify as traditional brokers. The SEC's strategic plan through 2030 indicates blockchain and crypto assets remain a long-term priority as potentially transformative technologies for financial infrastructure.

A federal securities regulator is drawing a line between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how that code gets used — and the distinction could reshape how the government treats software developers in the decentralized finance space.

Broader Regulatory Shift Behind The Remarks

Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, made the case Tuesday at the IC3 Blockchain Camp at Princeton University that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

She argued that developers who release DeFi code should not be automatically classified as securities intermediaries just because other people use what they built.

Legal liability, she said, should fall on those who actually engage in unlawful conduct — not on the people who wrote the underlying tools.

Peirce’s remarks fit into a wider rethinking underway at the SEC since Chair Paul Atkins took the helm.

Source: SEC

The agency has been pulling back from what Atkins has described as regulation by enforcement, with its Crypto Task Force now reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

Peirce, a long-standing voice for clearer rules in the crypto space, has been central to that push.

Rules Built For A Different World

She pointed to the SEC’s rulebook as evidence of the problem. The agency’s regulations were designed around intermediaries — brokers, dealers, exchanges, clearinghouses, transfer agents, investment advisers, and investment companies.

Peirce questioned whether those same rules make sense when applied to distributed blockchain networks that exist for purposes well beyond securities transactions.

Her comments came weeks after SEC staff issued separate guidance addressing broker-dealer registration requirements for certain user interfaces.

BTCUSD now trading at $62,332. Chart: TradingView

That guidance indicated some front-end websites and software platforms that provide access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition — a signal that the agency is rethinking how far its existing categories can stretch.

Digital Assets As Long-Term Priority

The SEC has also signaled that crypto and blockchain technology will remain a focus for years ahead. In its draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030, the agency described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America’s financial infrastructure.

Taken together, the staff guidance, the strategic plan, and Peirce’s speech at Princeton paint a picture of an agency trying to redraw boundaries that were never clearly set.

Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, what activity related to blockchain software is protected under the First Amendment?

AHester Peirce stated that publishing open-source blockchain software is a protected activity under the First Amendment.

QWhat key distinction is Hester Peirce drawing regarding blockchain code developers and legal liability?

AShe is drawing a distinction between writing blockchain code and being responsible for how it is used, arguing that legal liability should fall on those who engage in unlawful conduct, not necessarily on the developers who created the underlying tools.

QWhat broader regulatory shift at the SEC does Peirce's speech fit into?

AHer remarks fit into a wider rethinking at the SEC, led by Chair Paul Atkins, which is moving away from regulation by enforcement. The agency's Crypto Task Force is reviewing how existing securities laws apply to digital assets and decentralized systems.

QWhat recent SEC guidance suggests the agency is rethinking the application of traditional broker-dealer rules?

ARecent SEC staff guidance indicated that some front-end websites and software platforms providing access to decentralized protocols may not qualify as brokers under the traditional legal definition.

QHow does the SEC's draft Strategic Plan through fiscal 2030 characterize blockchain and crypto assets?

AThe SEC's draft Strategic Plan described blockchain and crypto assets as technologies with the potential to reshape America's financial infrastructure, signaling they will remain a long-term priority.

Letture associate

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbit55 min fa

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbit55 min fa

Congress Advances CBDC Ban Until 2030 Through Major Housing Reform Bill

Congress has passed the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, a bipartisan bill primarily focused on housing reform to improve affordability and supply. Included within it is a significant provision that bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) or "digital dollar" before December 31, 2030. The measure defines a CBDC as a dollar-denominated digital asset, a direct liability of the Fed, accessible to all Americans. Proponents argue the ban allows more time to study a digital dollar's impacts and addresses concerns about privacy, financial surveillance, and government overreach in digital payments. The provision specifically targets a retail CBDC but does not restrict permissionless blockchain networks. This crypto-related language, embedded in broader housing legislation, has drawn considerable attention for its potential to shape the future of digital assets and payments in the U.S. The bill's final passage will determine if the ban takes effect for the next decade.

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Congress Advances CBDC Ban Until 2030 Through Major Housing Reform Bill

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbit1 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbit1 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbit2 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbit2 h fa

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

A country that has been mining Bitcoin for eight years has established its own dedicated crypto bank. DK Bank, located in Bhutan's newly developed GMC special administrative zone, aims to fill the significant banking service gap for the cryptocurrency industry. Its CEO, Zheng YD, explained that most banks avoid crypto businesses due to a lack of risk management frameworks for decentralized and anonymous protocols. Operating under a unique "one country, two systems" governance model separate from mainland Bhutan, GMC aspires to become a financial hub for South Asia. DK Bank differentiates itself by offering integrated multi-currency accounts where users can manage both fiat currencies and stablecoins like USDT and USDC in one place, alongside services like Bitcoin-backed loans. The bank faces technical challenges in merging traditional banking systems with 24/7 crypto markets and implements rigorous on-chain and off-chain transaction monitoring for risk control. GMC's regulatory framework draws from Singaporean common law and Abu Dhabi's ADGM rules, offering a fast-track licensing process for already licensed firms while maintaining high standards. The initiative is part of Bhutan's longer-term crypto strategy, which includes Bitcoin mining since 2018. The focus, however, is on building a diversified institutional-grade crypto ecosystem—including custody and asset management—rather than retail speculative tokens. Proponents argue such sovereign crypto infrastructure is necessary, and Bhutan's early, measured approach exemplifies the thoughtful integration needed in global finance.

Foresight News2 h fa

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

Foresight News2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片