How Senate Democrats pushed CLARITY Act approval odds to 72%

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-05

Introduzione

Following a reportedly positive and productive meeting among Senate Democrats, market optimism surged regarding the passage of the CLARITY Act, a key crypto market structure bill. Prediction market Polymarket showed approval odds jumping to 72% on February 4th. Journalists cited that the effort, once considered nearly dead, is now very much alive, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer described as "very desperate" to get the bill passed, influenced by a $193 million war chest from a crypto PAC ahead of elections. A critical White House-led negotiation is ongoing, with a end-of-February deadline set to resolve the key sticking point: stablecoin yields. If a compromise is reached, a Senate committee vote could occur in March. Market odds have fluctuated, briefly dipping to 64%, but analysts believe the bill's progress could help stabilize the crypto market.

The market appeared optimistic again that the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, would become law this year, following a recent meeting of Senate Democrats.

According to the prediction site Polymarket, the chance of such a progress shot up to 72% on the 4th of February.

This was not surprising, going by reports that the meeting was ‘positive’ and ‘productive Democrat meeting to date,’ according to journalist Eleanor Terrett, citing people present at the talks. Terrett added,

“While members still have definitive asks, the takeaway from the meeting was that the effort, thought to be on life support just a few weeks ago, is far from dead.”

Is the crypto bill back on track?

Another reporter, Sander Lutz, echoed a similar stance but singled out the crypto lobby’s influence ahead of the November elections, a key driver for pro-crypto Democrats.

Citing a Senate source, Lutz said,

“Chuck Schumer was there, and is ‘very desperate’ to get the bill over the finish line, given crypto PAC Fairshake’s announcement of a $193 million midterms war chest.”

The update follows an earlier White House-led negotiation between the crypto industry and bankers’ trade unions to restart the previously stalled discussion on the bill.

The key deal-breaker remains the stablecoin yield, and the Trump Administration gave stakeholders until the end of February to reach a compromise.

Although the specifics of the proposed ‘compromise’ remain unclear, recent developments indicate a collective effort to advance the market structure bill. At the same time, several crypto leaders have expressed optimism about the potential for meaningful progress.

According to Mike Belshe, CEO of crypto infrastructure platform and custody provider Bitgo, stakeholders should get ‘everything right’ on the bill.

“White House set an end-of-February deadline for stablecoin yield agreement. Clock’s ticking. The industry needs clear rules—and fast. Getting this right matters.”

Meanwhile, the market expectations for the bill’s passage have surged from 50/50 at the end of January to over 70% in early February.

At the time of writing, however, the odds briefly slid to 64% as the market digested details of the Senate Democrats’ meeting.

If the stablecoin yield deal is reached this month, then another Senate Banking Committee vote on the bill could be feasible in March.

That said, Nansen and Grayscale analysts believe a positive update and progress on the CLARITY Act could help stabilize the ongoing crypto rout.


Final Thoughts

  • Senate Democrats’ meeting renewed overall market optimism about the crypto bill’s chance of becoming law this year.
  • However, the stablecoin yield deal remains the key potential deal-breaker for the bill’s progress.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the reported chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law on February 4th according to Polymarket?

AThe reported chance was 72%.

QWhich key issue remains the potential deal-breaker for the CLARITY Act's progress?

AThe stablecoin yield deal remains the key potential deal-breaker.

QWhat deadline did the White House set for stakeholders to reach a compromise on the stablecoin yield?

AThe White House set an end-of-February deadline.

QWhy was Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer described as 'very desperate' to get the bill passed?

AHe was described as 'very desperate' due to crypto PAC Fairshake's announcement of a $193 million midterms war chest, highlighting the crypto lobby's influence ahead of the November elections.

QWhat potential positive effect could progress on the CLARITY Act have on the crypto market according to analysts?

AAnalysts from Nansen and Grayscale believe progress on the CLARITY Act could help stabilize the ongoing crypto rout.

Letture associate

From 'Hardcore' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?

An article titled "From 'Solid' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?" analyzes the behavior of prominent crypto figures and institutions during a sharp Bitcoin price decline in February 2026, when BTC dropped from its $120,000 high to briefly under $60,000. The piece rates key players based on their public statements and on-chain actions during the crash. Michael Saylor and his company MicroStrategy are hailed as the "true hardliner" for their "suicidal" buying spree, purchasing billions of dollars worth of BTC at prices between $87,974 and $91,519, despite now holding at a loss. Their rating: "Solid (walking the talk, the one true god)." Binance is praised for its "top-tier" action of converting $1 billion of its SAFU fund into Bitcoin. Veteran trader Peter Brandt is also rated "top-tier" as an "honest bear" for consistently warning of a 50% correction since the market peak and sticking to his technical analysis. Author Robert Kiyosaki is rated "theoretical" for his constant anti-fiat rhetoric but slow action, waiting for extreme prices to buy. Model-based analysts PlanB and Benjamin Cowen are heavily criticized and rated "NPC (for entertainment only)" for their failed predictions and major shifts in narrative. Former "pump king" Arthur Hayes is rated the worst ("Weak") for going silent on Bitcoin after his lofty price predictions, instead discussing macroeconomics without stating his position. The conclusion states that only two types of people are worth following: "madmen" like Saylor who buy relentlessly with public proof, and disciplined traders like Brandt. All other predictions and analyses are deemed mere noise. The final question posed to readers is whom they trust: the influencers who changed their tune or the verifiable on-chain buyers.

marsbit12 min fa

From 'Hardcore' to 'Weak': Who is the Real Hardliner When Bitcoin Falls?

marsbit12 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片