TRON integrates with Coinbase’s Base network — but what does it mean for TRX price?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-19

TRON DAO has announced a major cross-chain integration with Base, allowing TRX to be bridged directly into the Base ecosystem via LayerZero.

The move positions TRON within one of the fastest-growing L2 environments, opening its token to new liquidity routes, DeFi activity, and a new wave of users outside its existing ecosystem.

But despite the significance of the announcement, TRX’s price has yet to reflect any meaningful shift.

TRON enters the Coinbase ecosystem through Base

With the new integration, users can now bridge TRX into Base and trade it through decentralized exchanges such as Aerodrome. For TRON, this represents one of the most important expansions of its network footprint in years.

Bringing this level of activity to Base gives the L2 a new flow of potential liquidity, while giving TRON users their first native access point into Coinbase’s expanding decentralized ecosystem.

Justin Sun called the integration “a meaningful step toward making blockchain networks operate more seamlessly together,” emphasizing shared goals around scale and interoperability.

The Base connection could become bullish, but TRX price has not reacted yet

Despite the significance of this development, TRX remains muted on the charts. The token trades around $0.28, locked inside a tight consolidation after months of downward pressure.

1. TRX remains range-bound with no breakout yet

The 12H chart shows TRX struggling to break above the $0.29–$0.305 resistance zone. The structure is still neutral-to-bearish, and momentum remains weak. For sentiment to reverse, TRX needs a clean move above the early-December swing highs.

2. Money flow remains weak despite the announcement

The Chaikin Money Flow [CMF] sits around –0.12, indicating more capital is flowing out of TRX than into it. This suggests the integration has not yet sparked renewed accumulation among traders or large holders.

Historically, TRX rallies when inflows turn positive for several days — something that has not happened yet.

3. Price impact depends entirely on real liquidity, not narrative

If the integration drives:

  • TRX liquidity pools on Aerodrome
  • Actual TRX inflows bridging onto Base
  • Higher trading volumes from Base users
  • Expanded cross-chain settlement flows

...then TRX could break out of its range and flip sentiment.

But without that activity, the market is treating the news as neutral rather than immediately bullish.

What to watch next for TRON

If Base becomes a meaningful liquidity extension for TRON — similar to how it uplifted other assets earlier this year — the medium-term price impact could be significant.

But for now, traders remain cautious, waiting for real usage data rather than reacting to the announcement alone.


Final Thoughts

  • The TRON–Base integration is strategically transformative, but TRX price remains stagnant until real liquidity and demand begin flowing through Base.
  • A breakout above $0.305 would be the first clear signal that the market is pricing in this new cross-chain expansion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the significance of TRON's integration with Base network?

AThe integration allows TRX to be bridged directly into Base via LayerZero, positioning TRON within a fast-growing L2 environment and opening it to new liquidity routes, DeFi activity, and users outside its existing ecosystem.

QHow has TRX price reacted to the integration announcement?

ATRX price has not shown any meaningful shift, remaining around $0.28 and locked in a tight consolidation with weak momentum and negative money flow (CMF around -0.12).

QWhat conditions could make the Base integration bullish for TRX price?

AIf the integration drives actual TRX liquidity pools on Aerodrome, TRX inflows onto Base, higher trading volumes from Base users, and expanded cross-chain settlement flows, it could break TRX out of its range and flip sentiment.

QWhat key price level would signal a bullish breakout for TRX?

AA clean move above the $0.305 resistance level would be the first clear signal that the market is pricing in the new cross-chain expansion.

QWhat does the current Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) reading indicate for TRX?

AThe CMF sits around -0.12, indicating more capital is flowing out of TRX than into it, suggesting the integration has not yet sparked renewed accumulation among traders or large holders.

Letture associate

Why Do DeFi Users Reject Fixed Rates?

Despite the intuitive appeal of fixed-rate loans for providing payment certainty, they have consistently failed to gain mainstream adoption in DeFi. This is not due to user rejection alone but stems from a fundamental mismatch between product design and actual user behavior. DeFi protocols are built as on-demand money markets, where lenders prioritize liquidity, composability, and the ability to exit or rotate capital instantly—features inherent to floating-rate pools like Aave. They accept slightly lower yields for this flexibility. In contrast, fixed-rate products require capital lock-up, sacrificing this optionality. The modest premium offered is often insufficient compensation for this loss. Furthermore, most crypto borrowing is not long-term credit but short-term leverage, basis trading, and collateral management. These borrowers are unwilling to pay a high premium for fixed rates as they don’t plan to hold debt long-term. This creates a one-sided market where lenders demand a lock-up premium, but borrowers refuse to pay it. Fixed-rate mechanisms also suffer from fragmented liquidity across different maturities, leading to poor secondary markets and significant price impacts for early exits. This forces lenders to become bond managers rather than passive liquidity providers. Ultimately, fixed-rate lending can exist as a niche product but is structurally disadvantaged to become the default in DeFi. The ecosystem is dominated by mercenary capital that values liquidity over yield certainty. For fixed rates to succeed, they must be treated as true credit instruments with priced-in exit options, rather than attempting to mimic liquid money markets.

marsbit43 min fa

Why Do DeFi Users Reject Fixed Rates?

marsbit43 min fa

Why Do DeFi Users Reject Fixed Rates?

Fixed-rate lending has consistently struggled to gain traction in DeFi, not because users inherently reject it, but due to a fundamental mismatch between product design and the actual behavior of capital in the ecosystem. DeFi protocols are built as on-demand money markets, where lenders—acting like cash managers—prioritize liquidity, composability, and the ability to exit or reallocate funds instantly. They accept lower yields in exchange for these features. In contrast, fixed-rate products require locking funds for a duration, sacrificing this flexibility for a modest premium that often fails to adequately compensate for the loss of optionality. Most crypto borrowing is not long-term credit but leveraged, tactical activity like basis trading and collateral recycling, where borrowers also prefer floating rates for their flexibility. This creates a one-sided market: lenders demand a premium to lock funds, but borrowers are unwilling to pay it. Fixed-rate markets fragment liquidity across maturities, leading to poor secondary markets and significant price impacts for early exits. While fixed-rate products can exist in niche, hold-to-maturity forms, they are structurally disadvantaged. The lender base, composed of mercenary capital seeking liquidity, will likely keep floating-rate money markets like Aave as the default, with fixed-rate serving only as an optional overlay for those explicitly seeking duration exposure.

Odaily星球日报46 min fa

Why Do DeFi Users Reject Fixed Rates?

Odaily星球日报46 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di S S sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片