Shiba Inu Lead Dev Issues Must-Read Year-End Letter: What You Must Know

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-30

Introduzione

Shiba Inu lead developer Kaal Dhairya published a year-end letter describing the project's most difficult period, marked by a hack and leadership departures. He confirmed engagement with federal law enforcement and outlined technical recovery steps, including reactivating the Plasma Bridge with enhanced security. Dhairya introduced the SOU ("Shib Owes You") system, an on-chain NFT-based claims process on Ethereum to track and repay affected users. He stressed that ecosystem revenue must be directed toward repayments as an obligation, not an option. The letter calls for a shift from hype to focused rebuilding and financial accountability in the year ahead.

Shiba Inu lead developer Kaal Dhairya published a year-end letter on Dec. 29 describing what he called the most difficult period in the project’s history, outlining post-hack recovery steps, law-enforcement engagement, and a proposed on-chain claims system meant to track repayment to affected users.

Shiba Inu’s Team Year-End Letter

“This year — especially the last few months — has been the hardest period in Shiba Inu’s history,” Dhairya wrote. “The hack happened. The leadership that was supposed to be here and help us through this difficult time — isn’t. They left, without accountability, and without looking back. I stayed.”

Dhairya said he is not writing as Shiba Inu’s “official ‘leader,’” but argued the community deserves a direct update on what has been done, what is still unresolved, and what changes internally. He described the team working “around the clock — all-nighters, weekends, holidays,” and positioned the letter as an accountability-driven reset focused on repayment and core infrastructure.

Addressing claims that the team failed to file official complaints, Dhairya said a formal process is underway and pushed back on demands for public proof. “I have personally been interviewed by not one, not two, but three federal agents,” he wrote. “I passed on everything I have — all the information, all the OSINT, all the details we gathered during and after the incident. The official process is happening. It has been happening.”

He declined to share a complaint ID and said he would not continue “defending” the response to opportunistic critics, arguing some are “looking to sell their snake oil and keep extracting from you.”

Dhairya said “the technical recovery is largely complete,” detailing changes made after the hack. He wrote that the Plasma Bridge is back online with new safeguards, including “blacklisting, 7-day withdrawal delays, and hardened contracts,” and said more than 100 critical contracts have been moved to hardware custody. Hexens reviewed “every major change,” he added, and the checkpoint system is functioning again.

He also flagged a longer-term architecture change: “We’re also decoupling the bridge from the validators,” describing it as foundational work intended to enable decentralization of Shibarium. Even with that, he cautioned that malicious validators remain a risk and decentralizing the chain “won’t be easy.” Dhairya drew a hard distinction between restoring infrastructure and repaying users. “But technical recovery is not the same as making people whole,” he wrote.

SOU: ‘Shib Owes You’ Claims Via NFT

To address repayment, Dhairya introduced SOU (“Shib Owes You”), a system he stressed is “not live yet” and likely to attract scammers pretending otherwise. Under the proposal, every affected user receives an “SOU NFT” that records what the ecosystem owes them as an on-chain claim on Ethereum.

“This isn’t a promise in a database somewhere,” Dhairya wrote. “It’s cryptographic proof that you own a claim, recorded permanently on the Ethereum blockchain where no one can manipulate it or make it disappear.”

Each SOU tracks a principal amount that declines as payouts occur or donations are applied, with progress visible “in real time” and verifiable. Dhairya said SOUs can be “merged, split, or transferred,” including the option to sell a claim for liquidity on supported marketplaces. He added that the system’s components—“minting, payouts, donations, transfers”—have been audited by Hexens.

Dhairya argued the system only works if cash flow is routed into it, and said that should be treated as an obligation for ecosystem participants, particularly those controlling official distribution channels. “For SOU to function — for affected users to actually get made whole — revenue has to flow into the system,” he wrote. “That means everyone who benefits from the Shiba Inu ecosystem needs to contribute back. Not optionally. As an obligation.”

He said he will pause or sunset projects that are not generating revenue or reaching break-even, and prioritize initiatives that can fund repayment. “Revenue flows to SOU. SOU pays back affected users. If a project doesn’t fit that chain, it waits,” Dhairya wrote. He also previewed potentially contentious changes, including revisiting tokenomics and restructuring or merging systems to redirect value “back to the network and to the users who were affected.”

In closing, Dhairya said he has personally committed significant time and funds to keep the ecosystem running, but cannot do so indefinitely. “I cannot keep doing this forever,” he wrote, calling for others to step up if they believe Shib should be “a decentralized network” rather than “a meme” or “a pump.”

“The year ahead won’t be about hype,” Dhairya added. “It will be about repair, focus, and building something that can actually last.”

At press time, Shiba Inu traded at $0.00000721.

Shiba Inu remains in deep bearish territory, 1-week chart | Source: SHIBUSDT on TradingView.com

Letture associate

Digging into 290,000 Market Data Points: Revealing 6 Truths About Polymarket's Liquidity

Based on an analysis of 295,000 markets on Polymarket, this report uncovers six key truths about its liquidity. A significant portion (22.9%) of markets are ultra-short-term (under 1 day), with 63% of these currently having zero trading volume, resembling the illiquidity of meme coins. While short-term crypto and sports markets exist, sports dominates short-term volume ($1.32M average) compared to crypto ($44k). Conversely, long-term markets (over 30 days), though fewer in number, are liquidity powerhouses, attracting large capital with an average liquidity of $450k. U.S. politics is the top category here, with an average trading volume of $28.17M. The analysis reveals a clear market dichotomy: short-term "casino-like" markets (crypto, sports) for small, high-frequency players, and long-term "macro" markets (politics, geopolitics) for large, patient capital. Most markets are concentrated in a few high-volume events, with 47% of all trading volume occurring in just 505 markets. New, complex markets like U.S. real estate face a "cold start" problem due to high expertise requirements and low volatility. Finally, the "Geopolitics" category is the fastest-growing, with the highest ratio of active-to-total markets (29.7%), indicating rising user interest. The core finding is that liquidity is not evenly distributed but clusters around events that offer either instant feedback or deep macro narratives.

marsbit3 min fa

Digging into 290,000 Market Data Points: Revealing 6 Truths About Polymarket's Liquidity

marsbit3 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di A A sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片