Ripple takes RLUSD multichain: Stablecoin expands to L2s with Wormhole

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-15

Introduzione

Ripple has expanded its U.S.-regulated stablecoin, RLUSD, to Layer 2 networks including Optimism, Base, Ink, and Unichain using Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers (NTT) standard. This enables native multichain issuance, reducing bridge risks and ensuring regulatory compliance. RLUSD is the first U.S. Trust-regulated stablecoin on these L2s. Backed by a NYDFS Trust Charter and with a pending OCC application, it aims to be the first dual-regulated stablecoin. The expansion enhances utility for both XRP and RLUSD, strengthening Ripple’s role in institutional DeFi and cross-chain liquidity.

Ripple has expanded its U.S.-regulated stablecoin, Ripple USD [RLUSD], to Layer 2 networks for the first time. This marks a major step toward a multichain strategy ahead of its full launch next year.

The testing rollout begins on Optimism, Base, Ink, and Unichain, and is powered by Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers [NTT] standard — a system designed to move assets across chains without relying on wrapped tokens or traditional bridge architectures.

The move positions RLUSD as the first U.S. Trust-regulated stablecoin to deploy natively on these L2 ecosystems.

RLUSD goes multichain with native issuance on L2s

Unlike bridged assets, Wormhole’s NTT framework enables RLUSD to maintain native issuance and control across every supported chain.

This approach reduces bridge risk, preserves liquidity integrity, and creates a regulatory-compliant pathway for institutional DeFi expansion.

According to the announcement, Optimism serves as the entry point, with Base, Ink, and Unichain interconnected through the same NTT infrastructure — allowing Ripple to scale RLUSD across multiple environments without fragmentation.

Ripple’s SVP of Stablecoin, Jack McDonald, said the expansion reflects rising institutional demand for a fully compliant stablecoin that can move across chains with predictable oversight.

“Stablecoins are the gateway to DeFi and institutional adoption,” he said. “By launching RLUSD on these L2 networks, we are setting the standard where compliance and on-chain efficiency converge.”

Why regulation matters more than ever

RLUSD launched under a New York Department of Financial Services [NYDFS] Trust Charter, one of the most stringent regulatory frameworks in crypto.

Last week, AMBCrypto also reported that Ripple has applied for an OCC charter. If approved, this would make RLUSD the first stablecoin simultaneously overseen at both the state and federal levels.

No existing major stablecoin, including USDC or USDT, operates under this dual structure.

Ripple now holds more than 75 licenses globally, with recent approvals in Dubai and Abu Dhabi further strengthening RLUSD’s international reach.

Utility boost for both Ripple XRP and RLUSD

The multichain expansion is designed to strengthen XRP’s role in cross-chain liquidity.

Hex Trust recently issued wrapped XRP [wXRP] to support interoperability, enabling XRP holders to pair wXRP with RLUSD on supported chains for swaps, payments, lending, or yield-generating applications.

Data from DefilLama shows that Ethereum currently has the highest share of RLUSD [79.2%] worth over $1 billion, while the remaining 20.8% is on XRPL.


Final Thoughts

  • RLUSD’s L2 expansion sets a new regulatory benchmark for multichain stablecoins and positions Ripple as a direct challenger to USDC’s dominance.
  • The move enhances utility for both XRP and RLUSD, creating a deeper role for Ripple in institutional DeFi and cross-chain liquidity.

Letture associate

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and CEXs, has sold 230,000 AAVE tokens at a significant loss of $13.45 million, causing a 12% price drop. This sell-off reflects growing tensions between Aave Labs and the community over governance and fund allocation. The conflict began when Aave switched its default swap aggregator to Cow Swap, redirecting front-end transaction fees—previously sent to the Aave DAO treasury—to Aave Labs instead. Community members estimated this change could divert over $10 million annually from the DAO to the team, raising concerns about transparency and control. Aave Labs argued that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize them. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets (domains, social accounts, etc.) to token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, citing its oversimplification of complex legal and operational issues, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural challenges in DeFi governance, where protocol value, team control, and community rights intersect. The outcome of an ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may determine AAVE’s short-term price direction and long-term community trust. If the conflict signals fundamental misalignment between Aave Labs and the DAO, this could mark the start of continued tension rather than an isolated incident.

marsbit52 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

marsbit52 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and exchanges, has sold off 230,000 AAVE tokens (worth approximately $38 million) at a loss, causing a 12% price drop. The sale occurred amid growing tensions between the Aave team and its community over governance and financial control. The conflict began when the community discovered that Aave Labs, without prior communication, redirected front-end exchange fees—previously directed to the Aave DAO treasury—to its own address after switching the default trading path to Cow Swap. This change could divert an estimated $10 million annually from the community to the team. Aave Labs defended the move, arguing that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize its own infrastructure. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets—including domains and social accounts—to AAVE token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, calling it oversimplified and poorly structured, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural tensions in DeFi between team-controlled products and community-governed protocols. The outcome of the ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may significantly influence AAVE’s price and long-term community trust.

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片