‘Over $10m lost annually’ – Why Aave Labs is under fire

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-14

Introduzione

The Aave community is facing an ownership crisis, with the DAO and its service providers, including Aave Labs, in conflict over protocol revenue. Critics argue that fees from features built and paid for by the DAO should belong to the treasury. This dispute intensified after a CowSwap integration redirected swap fees away from the DAO, estimated to cause an annual revenue loss of over $10 million. Delegates labeled this move a "privatization" of protocol revenue and an attack on tokenholders. In defense, Aave Labs founder Stani Kulechov highlighted the company's long-term contributions and innovations that benefit the DAO. Despite the debate, the price of AAVE remained stable around $200.

The Aave community is embroiled in an ownership crisis. Both the DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) and the protocol’s service providers are fighting for revenue.

At the centre of the crisis is Aave Labs, the service provider or one of the contractors that builds part of the DeFi lending protocol’s features.

Who owns Aave’s fees?

According to multiple governance participants, contractors, including the Labs, were paid directly by the Aave [AAVE] DAO.

As a result, the user interfaces, brand, and other features and associated fees and revenues are “fully owned” by the DAO because it paid for them.

However, a recent CowSwap integration changed that perception.

Under the new setup, swap fees no longer flowed to the DAO treasury, triggering backlash from delegates.

One of the token delegates estimated the DAO’s annual revenue loss to be at least $10 million.

“A loss to the DAO over 365 days seen by at least over $10m, assuming a transfer of only $200k each week.”

Critics argued that the ParaSwap, which was replaced by CowSwap, shared revenue with the DAO. However, the current arrangement sidelined the DAO for the private service provider.

Delegates raise the alarm

Earlier this year, Aave Labs proposed a tokenization product, Horizon, alongside a token, but it was shot down by the DAO.

For Marc Zeller, Founder of a token delegate and DAO service provider, Aave-Chan Initiative, Aave Labs’ “privatization” of protocol revenue was a “concerning” and “clear attack” on tokenholders.

Another VC partner, Louis, echoed a similar stance and added,

“The biggest threat to any token and DAO is a competing, independent equity vehicle. AAVE tokenholders should push back much more aggressively against this long-term risk.”

Aave Labs defends itself

The Aave token buyback is currently being undertaken by the DAO and is one of the mechanisms by which value accrues to tokenholders.

However, Stani Kulechov, the Founder of Aave stated that,

“Aave Labs has been contributing to the protocol and its benefit for over 8 years...It is responsible for innovation with Aave V4 and similar other protocol iterations and GHO, all those primitives that we built accrue revenue to the Aave DAO.”

On-chain data from Blockworks Research showed Aave recorded more than $15 billion in net deposit flows during Q3 2025.

That said, the alcoin’s price didn’t get caught up in the debate, as it remained range-bound around $200 for the past week.


Final Thoughts

  • Aave protocol ownership remains contested between contractors and the DAO.
  • Critics claimed that Aave Labs, a contractor, is undermining the DAO and tokenholders.

Letture associate

Don't Waste Every Loss: The 'Sisyphean Revelation' of the Crypto Market

The article "Don't Waste Every Loss: The Sisyphus Lesson for Crypto Markets" addresses skilled traders facing significant profit drawdowns despite strong historical performance. It draws a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus, who found meaning in the struggle itself, suggesting that success in crypto trading lies not in avoiding losses but in embracing the process with awareness and resilience. The piece critiques two common emotional reactions to major losses: doubling down aggressively (like a Martingale strategy) or quitting entirely. Both are seen as superficial fixes that avoid the core issue: flawed risk management. The real challenge isn’t knowing risk principles but executing them consistently under emotional pressure, ego, and stress. To recover, traders must accept the loss as a tuition fee for personal flaws, not bad luck. They should anchor to current net worth, not past highs, and avoid the dangerous urge to "win it back." Strict rules on position sizing, stop-losses, and discipline are essential to prevent catastrophic failures. Emotional release is encouraged, but the key is converting pain into a lesson to avoid repetition. The article concludes that such losses, if approached with a冷静, machine-like mindset, can build resilience and improve one’s system. Each failure becomes a moat that others must pay to learn. The goal is not redemption or revenge but growth, ensuring the same mistakes never recur.

marsbit27 min fa

Don't Waste Every Loss: The 'Sisyphean Revelation' of the Crypto Market

marsbit27 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di M M sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片