Cardano Founder Says ‘Leios Is Coming’ As Proposal Heads To DReps

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-05-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-15

Introduzione

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson announced progress on the Leios consensus upgrade as a ₳27.7 million funding proposal moves toward DRep approval. The proposal seeks to advance Leios from a public testnet prototype to a mainnet-ready release candidate, aiming to increase Cardano's transaction capacity by 10–65x to support its 2030 scaling goals of handling over 27 million monthly transactions. The upgrade enhances, rather than replaces, the existing Ouroboros Praos protocol. The six to nine-month project is structured around development, rigorous testing, and hard-fork enablement, with funding managed via milestone-based disbursements. The proposal acknowledges risks including community readiness, governance dependencies, and potential operational impacts on stake pool operators.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson signaled renewed momentum behind Leios, the network’s next major consensus upgrade, as Input Output moved a ₳27.7 million funding proposal toward DRep approval. The proposal seeks to mature Leios from an early public testnet prototype into a mainnet-ready release candidate, positioning the upgrade as a central piece of Cardano’s 2030 scaling strategy.

“Leios is coming,” Hoskinson wrote on X, quoting Sebastian Nagel, who said: “Cardano, if your governance permits, we’ll ship Leios.” The short exchange framed the next phase of Cardano’s scaling roadmap as both a technical delivery question and a governance decision.

Cardano’s Biggest Scaling Bet

The proposal, authored by Carlos Lopez de Lara and Nagel, asks DReps to approve a treasury withdrawal of ₳27,714,342 to fund six to nine months of development. The work is intended to move Leios from its current prototype and testnet phase toward a release candidate suitable for mainnet integration. According to the proposal, each milestone would be independently assured, while undisbursed ada would be returned to the treasury.

Leios is designed to enhance, rather than replace, Ouroboros Praos, Cardano’s existing consensus protocol. The proposal says the upgrade introduces endorser blocks and committee-based validation to increase transaction capacity while preserving Praos’s security model. IO frames the design as a way to scale Cardano without undermining decentralization or making stake pool operations economically unviable.

“Cardano needs a step change in throughput to meet its 2030 ambitions, and Leios is how it gets there. This proposal funds the path from public testnet to a mainnet-ready release candidate — delivering a 10–65x increase in transaction capacity,” the proposal states. “Why this scale matters: Cardano’s 2030 strategy targets growth from roughly 800,000 monthly transactions to over 27 million.”

That 2030 target is a key justification for the funding request. The proposal argues that sustainable utilization at that level would require at least 6x current capacity, while Leios is expected to deliver 10x or more under validated parameter settings. Elsewhere, the accompanying IO article says Leios could support a phased throughput increase from 2x to 30x current capacity on mainnet, with full capacity demonstrated on testnet before broader rollout.

The work is organized around three objectives. The first is a release candidate, including a substantial rewrite of consensus components, implementation of the Leios block structure for the Dijkstra era, conformance testing against the Agda formal specification, and integration into the primary node by the fourth quarter of 2026.

The second is “high confidence,” built through parameter exploration, continuous load testing, adversarial testing, red-team exercises, and an updated threat model. The third is hard-fork enablement, covering client interfaces, technical documentation, SPO and developer workshops, support for adjacent infrastructure such as DB-Sync, Mithril and Blockfrost, testnet hard forks, governance artifacts and contingency procedures.

The proposal is careful to separate work within IO’s control from external dependencies. A mainnet hard fork would still depend on broader ecosystem readiness, governance action submission and a community vote. The document explicitly describes those as risks rather than promises.

Funding would be administered through Intersect’s treasury reserve smart contract framework, with milestone-based disbursements and third-party assurance. The budget allocates ₳23.83 million, or 86%, to development, with smaller portions assigned to infrastructure, security and audits, legal and compliance, ecosystem support, operations, governance and other costs.

The risk section is direct. It identifies community readiness, hard-fork timing, final cardano-node integration and possible governance constraints as factors that could delay or limit activation. It also notes technical limitations, including potential higher operational costs for SPOs, greater chain growth, and high-throughput assumptions tied to adversarial stake conditions.

At press time, ADA traded at $0.2661.

ADA remains below key resistance, 1-monthly chart | Source: ADAUSDT on TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the purpose of the 27.7 million ADA funding proposal submitted to the DReps for Leios?

AThe purpose of the 27.7 million ADA funding proposal is to mature Leios from an early public testnet prototype into a mainnet-ready release candidate, funding six to nine months of development work to achieve this goal.

QHow does the Leios upgrade aim to improve Cardano's transaction capacity according to the proposal?

AThe Leios upgrade aims to increase Cardano's transaction capacity by 10x to 65x, introducing endorser blocks and committee-based validation to enhance throughput while preserving the security model of the existing Ouroboros Praos consensus protocol.

QWhat are the three main objectives of the Leios development work outlined in the proposal?

AThe three main objectives are: 1) Delivering a release candidate with a rewritten consensus, 2) Building high confidence through extensive testing and security exercises, and 3) Enabling the hard fork through client interfaces, documentation, workshops, and ecosystem support.

QWhat are some of the key risks associated with the Leios activation mentioned in the proposal?

AKey risks include community readiness, hard-fork timing dependencies, final node integration, potential governance constraints, higher operational costs for SPOs, increased chain growth, and high-throughput assumptions tied to adversarial stake conditions.

QWhat is the target for Cardano's monthly transactions by 2030 as cited in the article, and why does it necessitate the Leios upgrade?

ACardano's 2030 strategy targets growth from roughly 800,000 to over 27 million monthly transactions. This necessitates the Leios upgrade because sustainable utilization at that level requires at least a 6x increase in capacity, which Leios is designed to provide (10x or more).

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit14 min fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit14 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手14 min fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手14 min fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 h fa

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2 h fa

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ADA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Cardano (ADA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CardanoADA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Cardano (ADA)Dopo aver acquistato Cardano (ADA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Cardano (ADA)Scambia facilmente Cardano (ADA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.2k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2025.03.21

Come comprare ADA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ADA ADA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片