US targets Iran’s crypto sector, cites over $100M in oil-linked payments

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-08-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-25

Introduzione

The U.S. Treasury has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its entire digital asset sector, citing its use for sanctions evasion, including over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The sector-wide determination allows for sanctions on foreign individuals and companies operating in or supporting Iran's crypto industry. This follows a series of U.S. actions against specific Iranian-linked crypto exchanges and wallets, with the Treasury alleging Iran increasingly uses crypto as a "tool of choice" for illicit finance by entities like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The new measure significantly broadens the authority to impose sanctions based on participation in Iran's wider digital asset ecosystem.

The US Treasury has expanded its Iran sanctions framework to cover the country’s digital asset sector, citing more than $100 million in crypto payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales.

On Monday, the Treasury said the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued sectoral sanctions determinations covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping. The agency also sanctioned nearly 60 entities, individuals and vessels across nuclear, missile, cyber and oil networks.

The digital asset determination allows OFAC to sanction foreign individuals and companies that operate in or provide services supporting Iran’s digital asset sector. The Treasury said Iran increasingly uses crypto as a “tool of choice for sanctions evasion,” including for transactions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and government insiders.

It alleged that UAE-based Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov processed over $100 million in crypto payments since 2023 to facilitate oil sales on behalf of the IRGC’s Quds Force. OFAC sanctioned Obukhov and his UAE-based company, Foscom FZE.

US widens crypto enforcement against Iran

The sector-wide measure follows a series of US actions against named crypto exchanges and wallets linked to Iran. In January, OFAC sanctioned UK-registered Zedcex and Zedxion, marking its first Iran-related designations of digital asset exchanges.

On June 3, the Treasury sanctioned four Iranian crypto exchanges, including the country’s largest platform, Nobitex. The action came days after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US had seized nearly $1 billion in cryptocurrency from Iranian exchanges and wallets.

Most recently, OFAC sanctioned exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether on Aug. 7, alleging they facilitated a combined $5 million in digital assets connected to Iran.

Related: Iran-linked entities moved $3.8B through CoinEx, TRM says

Unlike the earlier actions against specific platforms, the latest determination provides a basis for sanctions based on participation in Iran’s wider digital asset sector. The Treasury said the determination “significantly expands” its ability to sanction foreign individuals and companies operating in or providing services supporting the covered sectors.

The accompanying OFAC determination states that any person determined to operate in Iran’s digital asset sector will be subject to sanctions under Executive Order 13902.

The Treasury said designated parties’ US-linked property must be blocked, while foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them could face restrictions on access to US accounts.

Magazine: MiCA cracks down on USDT in Europe... but no one else cares

Domande pertinenti

QWhat specific new authority did the US Treasury grant OFAC regarding Iran's digital asset sector?

AThe US Treasury, through OFAC, issued a sectoral sanctions determination covering digital assets. This determination allows OFAC to sanction foreign individuals and companies that operate in or provide services supporting Iran's wider digital asset sector, based on Executive Order 13902.

QWhat major allegation did the US make regarding the use of cryptocurrency by Iran?

AThe US Treasury alleged that Iran increasingly uses cryptocurrency as a "tool of choice for sanctions evasion," including for transactions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and government insiders.

QWho is Ivan Obukhov and what was he allegedly involved in according to the article?

AIvan Obukhov is a UAE-based Ukrainian broker. The article alleges that he processed over $100 million in crypto payments since 2023 to facilitate oil sales on behalf of the IRGC's Quds Force. OFAC sanctioned him and his company, Foscom FZE.

QHow does the latest sector-wide determination differ from previous US actions against Iranian crypto activities?

APrevious actions targeted specific named crypto exchanges and wallets. The latest sector-wide determination provides a broader basis for sanctions against any foreign person or company based on their participation in or support of Iran's wider digital asset sector, not just specific platforms.

QWhat potential consequences do foreign banks face under these sanctions?

AForeign banks that facilitate significant transactions for parties designated under these sanctions could face restrictions on their access to US correspondent or payable-through accounts.

Letture associate

$66 Billion 'Bitcoin Machine' Strategy Depends on Capital Markets, Not BTC Price: Report

According to a recent analysis by Regime Intelligence, MicroStrategy's $66 billion Bitcoin holdings may be less vulnerable to a cryptocurrency market crash than to a sustained loss of access to capital markets. This risk could threaten the company's ability to fund roughly $1.76 billion in annual obligations without selling Bitcoin. The report states that MicroStrategy's reserves of 840,447 BTC are backed by approximately $22 billion in debt and preferred stock obligations, meaning its accumulation strategy relies on the firm's continued ability to raise new capital. Contrary to popular belief, the primary vulnerability is not a drop in Bitcoin's price or liquidity issues, but this persistent dependence on capital markets. The report notes that MicroStrategy's debt does not function like a typical margin loan on Bitcoin, as there is no BTC-price-linked margin call forcing liquidation if the price falls. A stress test indicated Bitcoin would need to fall about 96% before its BTC assets would no longer cover its convertible notes. However, the risk shifts: MicroStrategy must continue paying about $1.76 billion annually in preferred dividends and interest regardless of Bitcoin's price. The analyst suggests investors monitor the company's cash reserves and the price of its preferred stock. If financing conditions worsen, the accumulation strategy could reverse, forcing the company to sell Bitcoin to meet its obligations, especially in a prolonged BTC downturn where raising capital becomes harder or more expensive. Despite its "never sell" ethos promoted by Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy has sold BTC four times since May to fund dividends, share buybacks, and bolster its dollar reserves. However, CEO Phong Le noted the company has accumulated roughly 25 times more Bitcoin than it sold this year and plans to resume purchases later in 2024.

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

$66 Billion 'Bitcoin Machine' Strategy Depends on Capital Markets, Not BTC Price: Report

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

Crypto Cards Are Turning Stablecoins into a Tool for Everyday Purchases

Cryptocurrencies are moving beyond trading and speculation, with stablecoins emerging as a tool for everyday purchases like groceries, utilities, and tickets. Crypto cards act as the key bridge, allowing instant conversion of wallet balances to fiat at point of sale. Data indicates rapid growth: total card top-ups are projected to reach $13.8 billion by August 2026, with global spending exceeding $1.04 billion in July 2026 alone. While USDT leads in overall market cap, USDC dominates the card payments segment, bolstered by integration with US fintech platforms. However, USDT is gaining share in developing regions. The competition is shifting towards matching the card's funding currency with the merchant's local currency to avoid conversion fees. Technically, the infrastructure is becoming multi-chain. While TRON is often used for storage and top-ups due to liquidity, Base leads in actual card settlement volume, followed by Solana and Polygon. Traditional finance is embracing this trend, with Visa expanding its stablecoin settlement program to nine blockchains. Business models are evolving from cashback subsidies to capital efficiency. New providers offer credit models where users collateralize crypto assets to borrow stablecoins for spending, avoiding capital gains taxes. This complexity is hidden behind a seamless user experience powered by a hybrid seven-layer infrastructure combining blockchain, traditional banking, and payment networks. In conclusion, crypto cards have moved beyond a niche, proving stablecoins as a practical bridge between Web3 and traditional retail. Their integration into global corporate networks shows traditional finance is not fighting innovation but actively incorporating it.

cryptonews.ru5 min fa

Crypto Cards Are Turning Stablecoins into a Tool for Everyday Purchases

cryptonews.ru5 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片