IOSG Founder: The Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in DeFi History

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-22

Introduzione

IOSG Founder: DeFi's Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma A $230M bad debt remains unresolved, with Aave Collector holding over $200M in liquid assets and LayerZero recently raising $120M—both fully capable of covering the losses. Aave has lost $8.45B in TVL in under two days, while the entire DeFi ecosystem has bled $13.2B. The silence from all parties involved is exacerbating the crisis. The author recalls the DeFi spirit of 2020, when MakerDAO faced collapse during the March 12 crash but took responsibility by auctioning MKR to cover bad debt. Today, in contrast, there is only silence. Users are withdrawing funds not just from Aave but from Spark and other DeFi protocols, voting with their feet. This loss of trust threatens the entire ecosystem. This is not just Aave’s problem. Spark, MakerDAO, and all Ethereum DeFi protocols must coordinate. Trust, once broken, affects everyone. Time is critical—every hour of silence leads to more capital leaving permanently. The author urges Aave’s Stani Kulechov, Vitalik Buterin, AaveDAO, KelpDAO, LayerZero, and RuneKek to communicate publicly and reassure the market. Silence is the worst option.

Author: Jocy, IOSG Founder

$230 million USD bad debt remains unresolved. Aave Collector holds over $200 million in liquid assets, LayerZero just completed a $120 million funding round—both are fully capable of covering the losses. Aave has lost $8.45 billion in TVL in less than two days, while the entire DeFi space has evaporated $13.2 billion. With each passing day, these numbers continue to grow.

But no party has responded to who should be responsible for the stolen assets, and no one has made a statement. They are playing a game of mutual博弈, while the entire DeFi space is suffering.

Where has the DeFi spirit of 2020 gone?

On March 12, 2020, ETH dropped to $80, on-chain liquidation auctions failed due to no bids, and prices一度归零, pushing MakerDAO to the brink of systemic collapse. At that time, the MKR Foundation stepped forward, proposing to auction MKR to buy back ETH and cover the bad debt, with major community participants actively engaging in the bidding.

Back then, the Ethereum community and the DeFi spirit made everyone proud—in the face of crisis, someone took responsibility, someone acted. Today? Silence. Many of my friends are not just withdrawing funds from Aave—they are pulling out from Spark and even other DeFi protocols. They are not panicking; they are voting with their feet: if this ecosystem cannot even resolve a $260 million issue with anyone willing to solve it, why should we keep our money here?

Once these funds leave, they will never return.

Aave has faced many governance crises in the past, with many in the community holding different opinions and disagreements never ceasing. But today is not the time for debating governance philosophy. Looking back at the prosperity of DeFi Summer, looking back at the decentralized financial world we built together—we have come a long way. The future of DeFi should not be destroyed by silence.

This is not just Aave's problem. Spark, MakerDAO, and all DeFi protocols on Ethereum should participate in coordination. Trust collapse does not distinguish between protocols; if this is not handled well, the entire DeFi TVL will be repriced, and everyone will suffer.

Time is extremely precious.

Aave could first commit to covering the losses, then take time to coordinate specific solutions, which would stop the bank run. If the projects remain silent, @VitalikButerin should step in to coordinate—no need to掏钱, just a statement saying "this matter will be properly resolved" would suffice.

Every additional hour of silence means more funds permanently流失.

Calling on @StaniKulechov, @VitalikButerin, @AaveDAO, @KelpDAO, @LayerZero_Core, @RuneKek to communicate publicly and give the market a clear signal.

Silence is the worst option.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core issue described in the article regarding the DeFi ecosystem?

AThe core issue is a $230 million bad debt situation resulting from an exploit, where major entities like Aave and LayerZero have the capacity to cover the losses but remain silent, creating a dangerous prisoner's dilemma that is causing massive capital outflows and eroding trust across the entire DeFi ecosystem.

QHow does the author contrast the current situation with the DeFi community's response during the March 12, 2020 (Black Thursday) crisis?

AThe author contrasts the current silence and inaction with the March 2020 crisis, where the MKR Foundation and community members proactively took responsibility by auctioning MKR to buy back ETH and cover bad debts, showcasing the 'DeFi spirit' of accountability and collective action that is now absent.

QWhat broader consequence does the article suggest if the current crisis is not resolved promptly and transparently?

AThe article suggests that if the crisis is not resolved, it will lead to a permanent loss of user trust and capital, causing a broader re-pricing of Total Value Locked (TVL) across all DeFi protocols, not just Aave, as investors withdraw funds due to a lack of confidence in the ecosystem's security and accountability.

QWhat specific action does the author propose to immediately stop the capital outflow and restore confidence?

AThe author proposes that Aave should immediately commit to covering the losses to halt the bank run, even if the specific reimbursement plan is coordinated later, and suggests that influential figures like Vitalik Buterin could help restore confidence by publicly stating that the situation will be resolved.

QWhich key entities and individuals does the author explicitly call upon to break their silence and communicate publicly?

AThe author explicitly calls upon StaniKulechov (Aave founder), Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum co-founder), AaveDAO, KelpDAO, LayerZero, and RuneKek (founder of MakerDAO) to provide public communication and a clear signal to the market.

Letture associate

Liquidity Forecasts Show Ozak AI Reaching a $1.5 Billion Fully Diluted Valuation Soon After Launch

Updated liquidity forecasts indicate that Ozak AI is positioned to reach a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $1.5 billion shortly after its initial exchange listings. With over $6.8 million raised in its presale—priced at $0.014 per token—and more than 1.17 billion tokens already sold, the project has demonstrated strong early capital formation, reducing downside risk during price discovery. Analysts highlight that Ozak AI’s concentrated early supply and capital-efficient structure could allow smaller liquidity injections to drive significant valuation expansion, potentially bypassing lower valuation ranges entirely. The project’s AI-native infrastructure—including Prediction Agents, the Ozak Stream Network, Data Vaults, EigenLayer integration, and Arbitrum Orbit deployment—supports higher valuation multiples by offering tangible utility rather than speculative appeal. Partnerships with Pyth Network, SINT, HIVE Intel, and Weblume further strengthen liquidity confidence and exchange adoption prospects. With robust presale performance, functional AI infrastructure, and favorable liquidity dynamics, Ozak AI is emerging as a liquidity-driven growth asset with the potential for rapid post-launch valuation scaling.

TheNewsCrypto3 h fa

Liquidity Forecasts Show Ozak AI Reaching a $1.5 Billion Fully Diluted Valuation Soon After Launch

TheNewsCrypto3 h fa

Exchange Exposure Could Push Ozak AI’s Daily Volume Beyond $500 Million Within the First Trading Month

Ozak AI ($OZ) is positioned to capitalize on market shifts from established altcoins to innovative AI-driven projects. With a successful presale raising over $5 million and strong token distribution, the project is expected to achieve significant trading volume upon exchange listing—potentially exceeding $500 million daily within the first month. Key factors driving this outlook include concentrated early investor interest, AI and DePIN utility, and strategic partnerships enhancing functionality and credibility. Unlike hype-driven tokens, Ozak AI’s real-world use cases in staking and ecosystem integrations support sustained trading activity beyond initial speculation.

TheNewsCrypto4 h fa

Exchange Exposure Could Push Ozak AI’s Daily Volume Beyond $500 Million Within the First Trading Month

TheNewsCrypto4 h fa

Clarity Act Reaches Critical Juncture: The U.S. Crypto Regulatory Crossroads

The U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory landscape faces a historic turning point in spring 2026. The fate of the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish a comprehensive market structure framework for digital assets—hangs in the balance. If it fails to clear the Senate Banking Committee by late April, its chances of passage drop drastically, potentially delaying U.S. crypto legislation for years. Simultaneously, the GENIUS Act is reshaping the stablecoin market through stringent prudential regulations, including AML/CFT compliance and reserve requirements, favoring major compliant players like USDC and Tether’s new USAT. A key political compromise led by Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks addresses contentious issues like stablecoin yields, though critical implementation details remain unresolved. The White House strongly supports the legislation as part of a strategy to make the U.S. a global crypto hub, but political challenges—including midterm elections and cross-party demands—threaten its progress. If passed, the CLARITY Act could unlock trillions in institutional capital and help the U.S. compete with the EU’s MiCA framework. If stalled, global regulatory leadership may shift to Europe and Asia. Regardless of outcome, regulatory clarity and compliance infrastructure are becoming central to competitive advantage in the crypto industry.

marsbit4 h fa

Clarity Act Reaches Critical Juncture: The U.S. Crypto Regulatory Crossroads

marsbit4 h fa

Warsh Hearing Concludes: What Are the Notable Signals for the Crypto Industry?

The Senate Banking Committee held a confirmation hearing for Judy Shelton, a Federal Reserve nominee, who faced intense questioning regarding her ability to maintain the central bank's independence amid pressure from President Trump to lower interest rates. Shelton denied any pre-arranged commitments on rate cuts and emphasized her independence, though Democrats remained skeptical, citing contradictions with Trump's public statements. Shelton characterized post-pandemic inflation as a major policy failure and called for a "regime change" in the Fed’s approach, including reforms to inflation measurement and communication strategies. She criticized the current practice of Fed officials frequently signaling future rate moves and did not commit to maintaining post-meeting press conferences, suggesting potential reductions in transparency. Regarding crypto markets, Shelton’s extensive investments in digital asset companies—including Solana, DeFi, and blockchain infrastructure—were noted, though she has pledged to divest these holdings due to ethics rules. Her familiarity with the crypto industry and deregulatory leanings may signal a more open, though cautious, stance toward digital assets. However, concerns were raised about potential conflicts of interest, especially given Trump family involvement in crypto-financial ventures. The timing of her confirmation remains uncertain, pending a Justice Department investigation into current Chair Powell. Shelton’s potential leadership could lead to a more hawkish, productivity-focused Fed with tighter policy communication—factors that may significantly influence liquidity conditions and macro narratives for crypto markets.

marsbit4 h fa

Warsh Hearing Concludes: What Are the Notable Signals for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit4 h fa

"Form Over Substance" Fed Hearing: Warsh Avoids Interest Rates, But Offers Reassurance for Crypto

Kevin Wash, nominee for Federal Reserve Chair, testified before the Senate Banking Committee, emphasizing his independence from former President Trump and stating that Trump never asked him to commit to specific interest rate decisions. Wash avoided extensive discussion on monetary policy but called for institutional reforms at the Fed, advocating for a gradual and cautious reduction of the balance sheet without clear signals on rate cuts. The hearing was seen as largely symbolic, with Wash’s confirmation hinging on political negotiations offstage, particularly whether Trump drops his investigation into current Chair Powell. Notably, Wash expressed a crypto-friendly stance, acknowledging digital assets as part of the U.S. financial services industry and committing to divest his own crypto holdings if confirmed. This marks a positive signal for the crypto market from a potential Fed leader.

Odaily星球日报6 h fa

"Form Over Substance" Fed Hearing: Warsh Avoids Interest Rates, But Offers Reassurance for Crypto

Odaily星球日报6 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures