USDT usage at 35% in 2026 – What’s the key factor driving investors to stablecoins?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-13

Introduzione

Investor preference for stability over risk is driving increased usage of stablecoins, with Tether [USDT] projected to reach 35.1% usage by July 2026, up from 29.0% in 2021. This growth is fueled by their expanding real-world utility, particularly in cross-border payments and corporate treasury operations. Major payment firms like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe are integrating stablecoins into their infrastructure, supporting a surge in daily active addresses and a total market value nearing $312 billion. While institutional investors continue to favor stablecoins for efficient transactions over speculative assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum, the growing corporate adoption for practical settlement and payment use cases is strengthening blockchain's long-term foundation beyond mere cost savings.

Despite crypto adoption rising rapidly, investor sentiment is currently favoring stability over risk. The desire for a safe investment choice is increasingly evident, as evidenced by the increase in Tether [USDT] usage as the dominant form of currency throughout the entire market.

Seasonal data shows USDT usage at 35.1% by July 2026, outperforming 2021’s 29.0% in the same period.

Source: TradingView

It also stands well above 2024, during which usage remained in negative territory.

Cross-border payments drive stablecoin utility

That growing stablecoin preference is no longer reflecting caution alone. It is increasingly supporting real economic activity across blockchain networks.

As global payment firms expand stablecoin settlement, users are interacting with these assets far more frequently than in previous cycles.

That shift is clear in the amount of ERC-20 stablecoin activity, which has increased significantly. Active addresses have surged, hovering between 400,000 and 700,000 daily since 2025.

Source: CryptoQuant

Stablecoins are being increasingly utilized by enterprises to support their cross-border settlement processes and treasury operations. This expansion coincides with Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe integrating stablecoins into cross-border payment infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the market has expanded to nearly $312 billion, reinforcing that demand now extends beyond crypto-native participants. If payment adoption accelerates, transaction utility could emerge as a primary growth driver.

As stablecoins gain wider acceptance in global payments, corporate adoption is beginning to strengthen blockchain’s long-term foundation.

The primary motivation for corporations to develop financial products utilizing stablecoins is no longer solely the cost savings associated with reducing settlement costs.

However, institutional investors have yet to rotate their investment into Bitcoin [BTC] or Ethereum [ETH]. This indicates continued preference by institutional investors for cost-efficient transactional outcomes versus speculative returns.

If sustained, corporates will play an increasingly pivotal role in blockchain adoption. This will be through delivering stability through real-world utility rather than cycle-driven speculation.


Final Summary

  • USDT’s demand increasingly reflects payment utility alongside defensive investor positioning.
  • Stablecoin adoption continues expanding as corporate integration strengthens blockchain’s long-term utility.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what percentage of the market is USDT usage projected to reach by July 2026, and how does this compare to 2021?

AUSDT usage is projected to reach 35.1% by July 2026. This outperforms the 29.0% usage in the same period in 2021.

QWhat is identified as a major real-world factor driving the increased utility and demand for stablecoins like USDT?

AThe major factor is their use in cross-border payments and settlements by enterprises, facilitated by integration from major payment firms like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe.

QWhat does the significant rise in daily active addresses for ERC-20 stablecoins (between 400,000 and 700,000 since 2025) indicate?

AIt indicates that users are interacting with stablecoin assets far more frequently than in previous cycles, reflecting growing real economic activity and utility on blockchain networks.

QWhat shift in corporate motivation for using stablecoins does the article describe?

AThe primary motivation is no longer solely cost savings from reduced settlement costs. It is increasingly about gaining stability through real-world utility and supporting treasury operations and payment infrastructure.

QBased on the article's 'Final Summary', what two key points summarize the current state and future of stablecoin adoption?

A1) USDT's demand increasingly reflects payment utility alongside defensive investor positioning. 2) Stablecoin adoption continues expanding as corporate integration strengthens blockchain's long-term utility.

Letture associate

Tokenized Equity Is Unbundling Venture Capital's One-Stop-Shop Financing Business

Tokenized Equity Splits VC's One-Stop Financing Business The article explores how tokenizing company shares on the blockchain fundamentally reshapes the venture capital model. Traditionally, a VC's term sheet is a bundled service providing capital, valuation, curation/signaling, network access, governance, and implied follow-on funding. Tokenized equity, where shares are natively issued and registered on-chain, enables the unbundling of these services. Securitize exemplified this by listing on the NYSE while simultaneously issuing its native stock tokens on Solana and Avalanche. This creates continuous liquidity and price discovery, allowing startups to source services separately. Market-based platforms can handle funding and valuation; specialized service providers manage cap tables, token vesting, and programmable governance; and key individuals or smaller funds can offer brand credibility and network access. While this unbundling commoditizes transactional and administrative functions, core VC value persists in areas resistant to digitization: deep value judgment, strategic guidance, and using personal reputation to attract talent, customers, and future investors. Just as record labels survived by focusing on A&R (artist discovery) after music distribution was digitized, VCs will evolve to specialize in the nuanced, human-centric aspects of startup building. Founders gain the freedom to choose which services to source from the market versus which to obtain from trusted partners, fundamentally changing early-stage decision-making.

Foresight News8 min fa

Tokenized Equity Is Unbundling Venture Capital's One-Stop-Shop Financing Business

Foresight News8 min fa

The Success of Robinhood Chain Proves Ethereum Is Not Dead

The article argues that Robinhood's decision to build its own dedicated blockchain, Robinhood Chain, as an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) using Arbitrum technology is a powerful endorsement of Ethereum's L1+L2 model, not a rejection of it. This move reflects a broader shift in the crypto industry from projects focused on token monetization to real-world businesses building cash-generating operations. Historically, many crypto projects chose infrastructure to support token sales and speculative value. In contrast, businesses like Robinhood and Coinbase (with Base) choose infrastructure based on commercial needs: security, liquidity, customer reach, and control. Ethereum's model provides a trusted, neutral, and liquid global settlement layer (L1) coupled with customizable, high-performance execution environments (L2s). This allows companies to maintain control and specialization without the cost and risk of building an independent L1 from scratch. The author contends that as more traditional enterprises enter the space to build sustainable businesses, they will rationally select Ethereum's L1 for maximum security and liquidity and its L2s for scalability and customization. This trend strengthens Ethereum's network effects and the utility of ETH as the native gas and asset within this expanding ecosystem. Robinhood's choice is thus seen as a landmark example of pragmatic business strategy aligning with Ethereum's architectural strengths.

marsbit46 min fa

The Success of Robinhood Chain Proves Ethereum Is Not Dead

marsbit46 min fa

South Korean Broker's 'Below-Expectations' Forecast Triggers 12% Plunge in SK Hynix, Putting Pressure on Entire Storage Sector

South Korean brokerage KIS released a forecast for SK Hynix's Q2 2026 earnings, predicting operating profit of 60.4 trillion won, up 556% year-over-year. However, this figure was about 8% below the market consensus of 65 trillion won. The shortfall was attributed to SK Hynix's high proportion of HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) revenue. HBM is typically sold under long-term agreements (LTAs) with fixed prices, which limited the company's average selling price (ASP) growth compared to the soaring spot market prices for standard DRAM and NAND. KIS emphasized this was a methodological adjustment to include LTA pricing, not a fundamental deterioration, and maintained its buy rating and 3.8 million won target price. Nevertheless, the report triggered a sharp market sell-off. SK Hynix's stock plunged over 12%, falling below 2 million won and extending its pullback from recent highs. The sell-off spread to related assets: leveraged ETFs tracking SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics fell sharply in Hong Kong, and A-share memory stocks also declined. Analysts note the incident highlights market sensitivity to earnings misses versus high expectations. However, KIS argues the long-term investment thesis remains intact, with the industry shift toward LTAs potentially leading to more stable, sustained profitability rather than volatile quarter-to-quarter ASP gains.

链捕手53 min fa

South Korean Broker's 'Below-Expectations' Forecast Triggers 12% Plunge in SK Hynix, Putting Pressure on Entire Storage Sector

链捕手53 min fa

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

"The 'Bitcoin Treasury' model is facing a critical test. BSTR Holdings, a company founded by Adam Back and holding 30,021 Bitcoin, has called off its planned merger with SPAC Cantor Equity Partners I. The deal, which would have taken it public, fell apart as the attached private investment (PIPE) financing collapsed. This failure highlights a core vulnerability of the 'Bitcoin accumulation company' strategy popularized by MicroStrategy. The model relies on a key metric: mNAV, or the premium of a company's stock market value over the value of its Bitcoin holdings. This premium fuels a cycle where companies issue shares at a premium, use the cash to buy more Bitcoin, and theoretically increase the Bitcoin per share for investors. However, with Bitcoin's price down roughly 49% from its late-2024 peak, this premium has evaporated across the sector. Companies like American Bitcoin and Metaplanet are also under severe pressure. For BSTR, the lack of premium meant investors were unwilling to fund the original deal structure at the proposed terms. The companies are now renegotiating. The next SEC filing detailing any new agreement will be a crucial indicator. It will show if the model can be repriced for a low-premium environment by preserving Bitcoin holdings and investor commitments, or if it requires significantly diluting shareholders and scaling back ambitions. The outcome is a public stress test for the entire 'Bitcoin treasury' investment thesis."

marsbit1 h fa

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片