Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-30

Introduzione

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 29th, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced two landmark actions on the same day: it formally approved the Bitcoin perpetual contract submitted by KalshiEX, LLC (Kalshi). Additionally, the CFTC issued a no-action letter to Coinbase, allowing Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through its subsidiary.

The CFTC also released a "Policy Statement on the Listing of Perpetual Contracts," providing a clear guidance framework for the listing of perpetual products on regulated markets. This combination of actions signifies a crucial step away from the longstanding regulatory gray area for U.S. crypto derivatives, moving toward a compliant path for genuine perpetual contracts.

Kalshi and Coinbase Both Receive Regulatory Approval

The CFTC's review determined that Kalshi's Bitcoin perpetual contract complies with the core principles of the Commodity Exchange Act and Designated Contract Market (DCM) regulations, including the depth and liquidity of the underlying Bitcoin spot market, contract design, and risk management capabilities. The approval order requires Kalshi to maintain ongoing compliance and clarifies that the perpetual contract design "may not be suitable for all asset classes," encouraging other market participants to engage with regulators and submit formal applications for perpetual products based on different underlying assets.

Furthermore, the CFTC's Division of Market Participants issued an interpretive letter and a no-action letter to the registered futures commission merchant Coinbase Financial Markets (CFM), permitting it to offer crypto options and perpetual contracts listed on Deribit to U.S. users. The letter confirms that these perpetual contracts can be classified as foreign futures under CFTC Regulation 30.1. Under specified conditions, the CFTC stated it would not recommend enforcement action against CFM for transferring customer-held digital commodities and payment stablecoins to its foreign broker affiliate for margin purposes, where the affiliate may exercise rehypothecation rights over such customer assets.

Previously, the U.S. market lacked genuine perpetual contracts (with no expiration date). Coinbase Derivatives had self-certified and launched "perpetual-style" futures in July 2025 (with contract terms up to 5 years), designed to mimic perpetual economic characteristics but still retaining an expiration date. Today's approval and no-action letters provide a dual compliance pathway for "true perpetuals": Kalshi follows the standard DCM futures route, while Coinbase reaches U.S. customers via the foreign futures + crypto collateral route.

Mike Selig

CFTC Chairman Mike Selig emphasized in his statement that perpetual contracts are important tools for risk management and price discovery in the global crypto asset market. Introducing true perpetual contracts in the U.S. is a significant step toward establishing the U.S. as a global crypto hub. He noted that the CFTC has established a workable regulatory framework for crypto asset perpetual contracts and will maintain market integrity by limiting excessive leverage, market volatility, and systemic risk.

Selig also acknowledged that the CFTC's current regulatory stance has not yet been formalized into a permanent rule, and future policies may adjust as the regulatory environment evolves.

The Trillion-Dollar Market Opportunity

So, why had the CFTC not approved true Bitcoin perpetual contracts until now?

Perpetual contracts were considered a "novel" product within the traditional commodity futures framework. They lack an expiration date and final settlement, which conflicts with the conventional understanding under the Commodity Exchange Act that traditional futures "must have an expiration date and a convergence mechanism." The CFTC internally debated whether to classify them as futures or swaps, as different classifications entail entirely different regulatory requirements (including clearing, margin, reporting obligations, etc.). This legal ambiguity made it difficult for platforms to secure a solid compliance path.

Furthermore, concerns about their high leverage and speculative nature, along with fears of market manipulation, have kept the CFTC's approach cautious.

BTCPERP, as a perpetual contract tracking the Bitcoin spot price, has no fixed expiration date. It uses a funding rate mechanism for periodic settlements between long and short positions to maintain a tight peg between the contract price and the spot price.

Perpetual contracts have long dominated the global crypto derivatives market. According to CoinGecko's 2025 annual report, the cumulative trading volume of crypto derivatives on centralized exchanges globally was approximately $85.7 trillion, with perpetual contracts accounting for about 78%. In 2025, the cumulative volume of perpetual contracts on decentralized exchanges reached about $6.7 trillion (a 346% year-over-year increase).

Ironically, while traditionalist regulators in Washington debated compliance, offshore decentralized perpetual platforms like Hyperliquid had already extended their reach to S&P 500, crude oil, and gold through on-chain synthetic assets. By the end of May 2026, Hyperliquid's perpetual trading volume had risen to $586.12 billion, and according to Allium on-chain data, the total open interest for Hyperliquid's network-wide derivatives also hit a record high of nearly $60 billion at the end of May. An increasing number of individuals and institutions are choosing to trade on its platform.

Hyperliquid Latest Open Interest

This unprecedented approval by the CFTC is not just an accommodation to the crypto market; it is a necessary "onshore defense battle" forced upon the compliant world by the innovative pressure from offshore "everything-as-a-perpetual-asset."

In contrast, while regulated Bitcoin futures like those on CME provide stable hedging tools for institutions, their leverage and trading characteristics differ from the perpetual products favored by retail/professional traders.

This approval by the CFTC undoubtedly opens a new battleground for Kalshi in the prediction market. The boundary between prediction markets and traditional crypto derivatives markets has completely blurred; Kalshi can leverage its compliant event-settlement logic to tap into the perpetual capital pool originally belonging to centralized exchanges. For Coinbase, the trading volume and revenue from its perpetual contracts will likely be reflected concretely in its next financial report.

U.S. traders previously relied heavily on offshore platforms, facing custody risks, regulatory uncertainty, and barriers to institutional access. The release of this regulatory policy, which supports crypto collateral, will attract traditional institutions like hedge funds and family offices to participate. Traders can hold leveraged positions long-term to hedge spot exposure without frequent operations; it will also attract some offshore traffic back to U.S. compliant channels.

Simultaneously, the approval for Kalshi and Coinbase will stimulate the accelerated launch of other products like ETH perpetuals, forming a more complete crypto derivatives matrix. In the long term, this policy may enhance the U.S.'s competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives ecosystem, attracting more capital, talent, and infrastructure, creating favorable conditions for deeper integration between crypto assets and traditional finance.

Now may indeed be the most regulation-friendly era for the crypto industry.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat were the two major actions taken by the CFTC on May 29th regarding crypto derivatives?

AOn May 29th, the CFTC officially approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract, and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets, allowing it to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a foreign affiliate.

QWhy was the approval of a 'true' Bitcoin perpetual contract in the U.S. considered a significant step?

AIt was significant because, under the traditional Commodity Exchange Act framework, perpetual contracts (with no expiry date) conflicted with the conventional definition of futures. The approval moves crypto derivatives from a regulatory gray area towards a clear, compliant path for truly perpetual products within the U.S.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global centralized crypto derivatives trading volume do perpetual contracts represent?

AAccording to CoinGecko's 2025 annual report data cited in the article, perpetual contracts accounted for approximately 78% of the cumulative trading volume on global centralized crypto derivatives exchanges.

QWhat does CFTC Chairman Mike Selig say is an important step in making the U.S. a global crypto hub?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated that introducing true perpetual contracts in the United States is an important step in advancing the U.S. as a global crypto hub.

QHow does the article characterize the CFTC's approval in relation to offshore platforms like Hyperliquid?

AThe article characterizes the CFTC's approval as a defensive move 'onshore,' a compromise by the regulated world in response to the innovation and growth of offshore platforms that have already popularized perpetual contracts for a wide range of assets, including traditional ones like the S&P 500.

Letture associate

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

The CLARITY Act, recently advanced by the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, fundamentally reshapes the stablecoin yield economy by closing loopholes left by the earlier GENIUS Act. Its Section 404 expands the ban on "hold-to-earn" rewards to all Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs) and their affiliates, prohibiting any passive, interest-like yield. Crucially, it introduces a legal distinction, permitting "use-to-earn" rewards based on actual activities like spending, trading, or staking. In anticipation of this regulatory shift, major Wall Street asset managers—Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and JPMorgan—have launched a series of tokenized money market funds (e.g., BlackRock's BRSRV, JPMorgan's JLTXX) designed explicitly for stablecoin reserve assets. These products represent a new, compliant yield layer: the stablecoin issuer earns interest from the underlying tokenized fund, which can then be passed to users through redesigned activity-based rewards. This marks a paradigm shift from a "hold-to-earn" to a "use-to-earn" market. While pathways remain for exchanges to redesign rewards (Path A) and for DeFi protocols to offer yield (Path B), the tokenized reserve asset layer (Path C) emerges as the most robust and strategically positioned infrastructure. However, this concentration—exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL fund backing over 90% of USDtb's reserves—introduces new systemic risks. The final outcome hinges on regulatory decisions, particularly the OCC's proposed 20% cap on tokenized assets in reserves, which will determine the scalability of this new financial infrastructure layer.

marsbit12 min fa

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

marsbit12 min fa

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手4 h fa

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手4 h fa

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit4 h fa

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit4 h fa

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手4 h fa

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

342 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2025.07.17

Come comprare ERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片