Backpack Surges Over 150% in Half a Month

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-15

Introduzione

BP, the token of the Backpack exchange, has surged over 150% since early June, driven by the platform's expansion into regulated US stock brokerage and asset tokenization services. On June 2nd, Backpack announced Backpack Securities, offering traditional stock trading and tokenization, causing BP's price to jump over 80%. Momentum continued on June 12th with the launch of SPCX, a tokenized product for SpaceX stock on Solana, facilitating seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. This aligns with the RWA (Real World Assets) narrative, creating a bridge between traditional finance and Solana DeFi. The token's unique economics also support its growth. All 2.5 billion initially circulating tokens were airdropped to the community, with zero allocation to the team or investors at launch. A key feature allows users who stake BP for at least one year to gain the right to convert tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Despite some initial community controversy over airdrop distribution, focus is shifting to BP's long-term utility and value alignment as real products launch.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On June 15, the Backpack exchange token BP surged over 30% again within 24 hours, currently quoted at $0.475 with a market cap of $118.48 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $473.94 million. Since early June this year, BP has skyrocketed from around $0.16, breaking through a high of $0.48.

The direct catalyst for this market surge stems from the platform's latest breakthroughs in traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services.

Venturing into U.S. Stock Brokerage and Tokenization Business

In March 2026, BP completed its Token Generation Event (TGE) on Solana with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 250 million. After listing, the token price briefly touched a high point before rapidly declining, with a single-day drop exceeding 40% at its worst, as the market was once filled with profit-taking pressure. For several weeks thereafter, the price consolidated at lower levels until a turning point emerged in early June.

On June 2, Backpack announced the launch of the Backpack Securities platform, which will provide regulated U.S. stock brokerage services while also supporting the tokenization of traditional stocks for circulation on the blockchain, enabling seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. The brokerage service is planned to launch gradually in June, with initial tokenized products rolled out in the Solana ecosystem through a partnership with Sunrise. BP skyrocketed over 80% in a single day, rapidly climbing from the $0.14-$0.15 range to around $0.27, with its market cap approaching $70 million at one point.

On June 12, coinciding with SpaceX's listing on NASDAQ, its tokenized product SPCX launched on Solana. In the subsequent 24 hours, BP rose approximately 27% further, pushing its price above $0.347. This token is pegged 1:1 to real SpaceX shares, supports 24/7 on-chain trading, and can be redeemed through a Backpack brokerage account into a traditional securities account, achieving interoperability between on-chain and off-chain assets. On its first day of launch, the product generated around $35-38 million in on-chain trading volume across DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium. According to the latest official data, the total on-chain SPCX trading volume exceeds $86 million.

Backpack is building a bridge between traditional U.S. stocks and Solana DeFi. Users can not only trade crypto assets within the platform but also access real stocks through the same account and tokenize portions of their assets for use, trading, or composition on-chain. This pathway aligns highly with the current RWA (Real World Assets) narrative and provides the BP token with clearer use cases and demand support.

BP's recent surge stems more from substantial platform business expansion than short-term speculation. Currently, its official website shows that Backpack's total custodied assets (nominal value) have rebounded to $390 million.

No Tokens for the Team Unless the Company Goes Public

Supporting the above business development is the BP token and its unique economic structure launched as early as March. The total supply of 1 billion tokens is divided into three phases: 25% (250 million) at TGE was entirely airdropped to community users, with approximately 240 million allocated to participants in the points program and 10 million to Mad Lads NFT holders. At launch, the team, founders, and investors received 0 token allocation; 37.5% in the Pre-IPO phase is tied to growth triggers such as regulatory milestones and product launches, continuing to be distributed to users upon unlocking; 37.5% in the Post-IPO phase enters the company treasury, locked for at least one year after an IPO, with the team benefiting only through equity, not directly through tokens.

The most attention-grabbing mechanism is the equity conversion design: users who stake BP for at least 1 year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition, with the bonus increasing with holding time up to the 4th year based on the initial unlock.

Additionally, staking provides benefits such as tiered trading fee discounts, extra yield on USD collateral, free wire transfers, and priority access to the Backpack Card. Currently, about 66% (approximately 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

While the airdrop process was technically smooth, it also sparked community discussion. Supporters argue that the "no insider TGE allocation" model is quite radical, and the points system genuinely rewarded trading and ecosystem participation. Criticism focused on the relatively strict Sybil filtering mechanism, which led to some long-term users having their points removed, resulting in lower-than-expected allocations, as well as noticeable profit-taking during the post-listing price correction. CEO Armani Ferrante publicly denied allegations of team OTC sales.

These controversies temporarily affected market sentiment, but as tangible products like Backpack Securities were launched, the focus is gradually shifting from allocation details to the platform's long-term growth and the token's actual utility. Against the backdrop of the platform's expansion into U.S. stock brokerage and tokenization services, the long-term alignment value of BP's staking and equity mechanisms is being reevaluated.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the key factor driving the recent sharp increase in the price of Backpack's BP token?

AThe key driver is Backpack's expansion into traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services through its new Backpack Securities platform, starting with the tokenized SpaceX (SPCX) offering on Solana.

QWhat is the unique feature of BP's tokenomics regarding team and investor allocation?

AAt TGE, 0 tokens were allocated to the team, founders, or investors. 100% of the initial circulating supply (25% of total) was airdropped to the community. Team members can only benefit through company equity (via a token conversion option post-IPO), not through direct token holdings.

QWhat significant milestone for Backpack occurred on June 12 alongside SpaceX's NASDAQ IPO?

AOn June 12, the tokenized product for SpaceX, SPCX, was launched on Solana. It is a 1:1 tokenized representation of real SpaceX stock, facilitating 24/7 on-chain trading.

QWhat major benefit can BP stakers obtain, and what percentage of the circulating supply is currently staked?

AStakers who lock BP for at least one year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Currently, approximately 66% (about 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

QWhat criticism did the BP token airdrop face from parts of the community?

ACriticism focused on the Sybil filtering mechanism being overly strict, which led to some long-term users having their points invalidated and receiving fewer tokens than expected. There were also accusations of team OTC selling, which the CEO denied.

Letture associate

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbit1 min fa

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbit1 min fa

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight News21 min fa

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight News21 min fa

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

A bettor known as "fishalive" made a stunning profit of nearly $9 million on the Polymarket prediction platform by correctly wagering against favorites during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The account, registered just before the tournament, risked roughly $400,000 on two contracts for a Spain vs. Cape Verde match: one that Spain would *not* win, and another on a Cape Verde +2.5 goal handicap. The resulting 0-0 draw triggered both payouts. This single event, with a total market volume of $64 million, highlighted extreme profit-and-loss divergence. Other traders, like "betoor619" and "leeeeroyjenkins," lost millions by betting heavily on favorites Spain and Belgium to win outright—contracts that become worthless in a draw. The article explains that while markets heavily favored strong teams, the "team to win" contracts are binary and do not account for the common outcome of a draw. This creates high-risk, low-reward scenarios for favorite backers, while asymmetric profits flow to those betting on underdogs or against outright wins. The transparency of Polymarket's on-chain ledger publicly documents these massive wins and losses, driving mainstream media coverage. As the tournament progresses, the author suggests traders may shift towards hedging strategies that account for draws. The piece also notes growing regulatory scrutiny in the US and Europe, questioning whether such large-scale, anonymous sports prediction markets should be regulated as gambling or financial derivatives.

Foresight News50 min fa

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

Foresight News50 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片