Crypto Groups Sue Illinois Authorities Over Digital Assets Tax

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-24

Introduzione

The Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association have filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois over its newly enacted 0.2% tax on digital assets, set to begin in January 2027. Filed in an Illinois district court, the lawsuit argues the transaction-based tax violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, due process laws, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act. The groups claim the tax is unconstitutionally vague, forcing residents and brokers to determine which assets are taxable under threat of civil and criminal penalties. They also allege it discriminates against digital commerce, creates a risk of double taxation, and threatens to fragment the national market. This lawsuit follows a similar one from the Digital Chamber of Commerce, highlighting crypto industry groups' pushback against state-level digital asset taxes. Concurrently, prediction markets platform Kalshi is separately suing Illinois over a new state law it says bans sports event contracts and imposes an unconstitutional state-level licensing requirement.

The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and the Blockchain Association (BA) have filed a lawsuit against Illinois authorities over the introduction of a 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency in the state. The tax is planned to be levied starting in January 2027.

In the lawsuit, filed on Friday in the Sangamon County District Court, which is part of the Seventh Judicial District, lawyers for the two cryptocurrency advocacy organizations challenged Illinois' digital assets tax. They argue that it violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, federal and state due process laws, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act. In June, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed a law introducing this "privilege tax" as part of the state's budget for the 2027 fiscal year. The law mandates that cryptocurrency users be taxed based on transaction volume, not income.

In the claim alleging a violation of due process rights, CCI and BA stated that the tax is "unconstitutionally vague," as it requires residents and brokers, "under threat of serious civil and criminal penalties," to determine which assets and in what manner are subject to the tax. The organizations also cited the U.S. Constitution and claimed an alleged violation of the Commerce Clause: according to them, the state tax "creates a risk of double taxation."

"States have an important role in fostering innovation, but these powers have constitutional limits," said Blockchain Association CEO and former U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commissioner Summer Mersinger. "Illinois cannot create a new tax regime that discriminates against digital commerce, creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses, and threatens to fragment a rapidly growing nationwide market."

Source: Blockchain Association

The CCI and BA lawsuit follows a similar one filed by The Digital Chamber in July. The organization stated that the Illinois tax "discriminates against people transacting in digital assets." The lawsuits demonstrate the influence of groups representing digital assets interests opposing laws passed by U.S. state authorities in an election year. Cryptocurrency policies, laws, and regulations can influence voters.

Related: Nigeria Establishes Rules for Collecting Taxes from Crypto Platforms for Digital Assets

Illinois Also Targets Prediction Markets

Opposition to the cryptocurrency tax began against the backdrop of a lawsuit by prediction markets platform Kalshi against Illinois authorities over a law that took effect on July 1. According to the company, the legislation "directly prohibits contracts on sporting events," violating federal law by requiring state-level licensing.

Separately, Pritzker signed an order banning state employees from placing bets on these platforms. The order was signed in April to "prevent insider trading amid the rise of online prediction markets and gambling contracts related to events."

Magazine: Crypto Industry Ties Became a Burden in Illinois Primaries

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason the Crypto Council for Innovation and Blockchain Association are suing the authorities of Illinois?

AThey are suing to challenge the new 0.2% tax on digital assets, arguing it violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, federal and state laws regarding due process, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act.

QAccording to the lawsuit, what specific constitutional issue does the Illinois digital asset tax create?

AThe lawsuit claims the tax violates the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause because it allegedly "threatens double taxation" and discriminates against digital commerce, risking fragmentation of the national market.

QWhat criticism did the Blockchain Association's CEO, Summer Mersinger, direct at the Illinois tax?

ASummer Mersinger stated that Illinois cannot impose a new tax regime that discriminates against digital commerce, creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses, and threatens to fragment the rapidly growing national market.

QWhen is the 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency transactions in Illinois planned to take effect?

AThe tax is planned to be levied starting from January 2027, as part of the state's budget for the 2027 fiscal year.

QBesides the crypto tax, what other recent Illinois law is facing a legal challenge mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that the prediction market platform Kalshi is suing Illinois over a law that took effect on July 1, which the company says directly bans contracts on sports events by imposing state-level licensing requirements in violation of federal law.

Letture associate

Is Bitcoin's Recent Surge a Blessing or a Trap?

Bitcoin recently surged from around $63,000 to almost $80,000. According to Glassnode, this rally is not solely due to low liquidity but driven by real capital inflows. Key factors include aggressive spot market buying, increased trading volumes, improved market depth, and significant institutional demand, as evidenced by high volumes and inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs. Derivatives market data shows investors adopting more aggressive risk management, with strong perpetual futures buying. However, a substantial increase in futures open interest points to heightened speculative activity and leverage use. On-chain metrics support the bullish activity, with growth in active addresses and asset-adjusted transfer volume, indicating accelerated user and economic activity within the network. Investor profitability has also improved significantly, with both unrealized and realized profits rising well above historical averages. This is shifting investor behavior toward profit-taking rather than loss-selling. However, Glassnode cautions that the current market structure is not yet fully based on long-term capital accumulation. It notes that "hot capital," representing short-term, price-sensitive funds, is elevated, while macroeconomic-scale capital inflows remain relatively limited. The rally appears to be supported more by active short-term investors, tactical positioning, and growing speculative appetite than by sustained, long-term accumulation.

cryptonews.ru9 min fa

Is Bitcoin's Recent Surge a Blessing or a Trap?

cryptonews.ru9 min fa

Bitcoin Reaches $80,000: Three Arguments Against a Bull Market

Bitcoin reached $80,000 on August 24, 2026, a 38% rise from its July low of $57,800. While this surge is notable, analyst Rekt Capital presents three arguments against it signaling a true bull market reversal, suggesting it may instead be a rally within a broader bear market. First, if July 2026 was the bear market bottom, its formation time was 27% shorter than historical averages, a conclusion only valid if no new lower low forms by year-end. Second, Bitcoin broke down from a macro triangle pattern in July, but the subsequent ~30% drop was significantly smaller than the 48-62% declines seen after similar breakdowns in past cycles. Third, and crucially, the price has failed to break the long-term descending trendline from early 2025 highs, meaning Bitcoin is still making lower highs on macro timeframes, indicating underlying weakness. Rekt Capital notes the dynamic trendline resistance is near $79,000 this month, dropping to ~$76,300 next month. A monthly close below it could open the door for a correction. On weekly charts, resistance sits at $74.5k-$83.5k, with support at $62.5k-$68.5k. Adding another perspective, Crypto Rover highlights two key liquidation levels on Bitcoin's heatmap: a cluster of short positions at $80k-$90k (which could fuel a squeeze higher) and a concentration of long positions at $48k-$60k, acting as competing price "magnets." The article contrasts Rekt Capital's current cautious stance with his past calls in 2025, noting he correctly identified market direction but underestimated the scale of both the subsequent spring rally and the following autumn/winter decline. His current analysis again emphasizes macro weakness despite the recent price rise.

cryptonews.ru39 min fa

Bitcoin Reaches $80,000: Three Arguments Against a Bull Market

cryptonews.ru39 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片