Analyst’s Bitcoin Price Crash Prediction From May 2025 Resurfaces And It Says The Bottom Is Not In

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-02-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-09

Introduzione

A previously published Bitcoin price crash projection from analyst KillaXBT, dating back to May 13, 2025, has regained attention for accurately predicting the current market downturn. The model uses rotational market mathematics to identify cycle stages—accumulation, distribution, and breakdown—and signaled that Bitcoin had not yet reached a macro bottom. The analysis highlighted key levels, including accumulation phases that fueled the rally and distribution zones near $115,000–$120,000 where exhaustion signals emerged. The chart correctly anticipated rejections at highs, fading momentum, and eventual breakdowns, with Bitcoin transitioning into mid-range consolidation around $100,000 before falling further. Currently, Bitcoin is trading in a lower distribution band near $70,000, with the model suggesting extended bearish consolidation. Relief rallies lack strength, and volatility remains high on declines. The projection indicates a potential capitulation toward $50,000 to complete the distribution phase, concluding that the true market bottom has not yet been established.

A previously published Bitcoin price crash projection from May 13, 2025, has re-entered market discourse after several prominent crypto traders on X recirculated the chart and commended the foresight behind the analysis from KillaXBT. The model mapped Bitcoin’s full cycle structure — from accumulation to distribution and breakdown — long before the current correction unfolded. Now, the same framework is signaling that Bitcoin has yet to establish a macro bottom.

Chart Signals That Nailed The Bitcoin Price Crash

KillaXBT’s framework is built on rotational market mathematics, measuring how many times price cycles are within a range before exhaustion. The analyst segmented Bitcoin’s structure into consolidation blocks and assigned swing counts to identify when liquidity had been fully absorbed.

In the early phase, accumulation rotations labeled “(2×2)+1 = 5” and “(5×2)+1 = 11” defined the base that ultimately fueled Bitcoin’s impulsive rally. These counts indicated that internal liquidity cycling was complete, clearing the path for expansion. Once that move matured, the price transitioned into a high-range consolidation beneath the cycle peak.

Inside the 115,000–120,000 distribution zone, the chart identified overlapping exhaustion clusters marked “(2×5)+1 = 9” and “(3×2)+1 = 7.” For traders, stacked counts at highs typically signal supply absorption. Although Bitcoin printed marginal higher highs, momentum was fading — a textbook late-stage distribution signal.

Source: Chart from KillaXBT on X

Market behavior followed that roadmap. Bitcoin formed repeated rejection wicks near the highs, upside momentum slowed, and breakout attempts failed to secure acceptance above resistance. Volume compression reinforced the distribution thesis. Instead of continuation, the price rolled over.

The model then mapped a transition into mid-range consolidation around the 100,000 psychological level, with BTCUSDT referenced near 102,603. Annotated “(2×2)+1 = 5, then subtract 2 = 3,” the structure signaled weakening bounce capacity. Price action mirrored the setup: multiple support tests, lower highs, and eventual breakdown — completing the crash phase outlined in the May 2025 forecast.

Bitcoin Price Could Drop Further Before Hitting Bottom

The resurfaced chart’s larger significance lies in its forward projection. After the six-figure range failed, the model guided Bitcoin into a lower distribution band around 70,000. This zone carried heavier rotational counts — “4×2 = 8” and “(5×5)+1 = 26” — implying extended consolidation within a bearish continuation framework.

Current market behavior continues to align with that structure. Bitcoin has already rotated into lower support territory following the 100K breakdown, while volatility has expanded on selloffs rather than recoveries. Relief rallies remain corrective, lacking the impulsive follow-through required to confirm bottom formation.

The chart’s final stage shows a potential capitulation toward the $50,000 area, marked by a sharp move below the lower range. Structurally, this is an unfinished downside that completes the current distribution phase.

The sequence is straightforward: accumulation pushed prices higher, the rise led to distribution, and now distribution is causing further breakdowns. Because no consolidation has shown the expansion profile typical of a macro base, the model maintains that the true bottom is not yet in.

BTC trading at $69,162 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main prediction of the resurfaced Bitcoin price analysis from May 2025?

AThe analysis predicts that the Bitcoin price crash is not over yet and that the true macro bottom has not been established, with a potential further drop toward the $50,000 area.

QWho created the Bitcoin price projection model that is being discussed?

AThe model was created by an analyst known as KillaXBT.

QWhat key mathematical concept does KillaXBT's framework use to analyze Bitcoin's price action?

AThe framework is built on rotational market mathematics, measuring how many times price cycles are within a range before exhaustion, using formulas like (2x2)+1=5 to identify liquidity absorption and exhaustion clusters.

QAccording to the model, what was the significance of the distribution zone between $115,000 and $120,000?

AThis zone was identified as a high-range distribution area with overlapping exhaustion clusters, signaling supply absorption and marking a late-stage distribution phase before the price rolled over.

QWhat is the model's final projected stage for the current Bitcoin price cycle?

AThe model's final projected stage is a potential capitulation event, involving a sharp move below the lower consolidation range toward the $50,000 area to complete the current distribution phase.

Letture associate

Ethereum Repricing: From Rollup-Centric to the 'Security Settlement Layer'

Ethereum is undergoing a fundamental strategic shift, moving from a "Rollup-Centric" scaling vision to establishing itself as a global "Security Settlement Layer." This pivot, highlighted by Vitalik Buterin's recent reflections, acknowledges the slower-than-expected decentralization of Layer 2s (L2s) and the increasing throughput capacity of the Ethereum mainnet (L1) itself. The core change is a new "L1-first paradigm." L1 will focus on providing the highest levels of security, censorship resistance, and finality, while L2s evolve into a spectrum of networks offering differentiated services (e.g., privacy, AI). This redefines Ethereum's value proposition: its core asset is no longer just transaction throughput ("traffic") but its unparalleled "settlement sovereignty." This shift necessitates a complete recalibration of Ethereum's valuation framework. Traditional corporate models (like P/E ratios) are a category error, as Ethereum is a neutral infrastructure that often prioritizes lower fees and ecosystem growth over protocol revenue. A new model is proposed, weighting four value quadrants: 1. **Security Settlement Layer (45% weight):** ETH's value as a credibly neutral, global settlement base. Priced via validator economics and staking DCF models. 2. **Monetary Property (35%):** ETH's role as the native currency for on-chain finance (stablecoins, DeFi, RWA). Valued using a layered monetary demand model. 3. Platform/Network Effects (10%): Growth optionality from ecosystem expansion, measured by a trust-adjusted Metcalfe model. 4. Protocol Revenue (10%): A cash flow floor during bear markets, valued via P/S and fee yield models. An external "state adaptation" mechanism is suggested to dynamically adjust these weights based on macro conditions, market structure, and on-chain sentiment. Furthermore, the path towards institutionalization—through staking ETFs and using ETH for settlement—could create a "second curve" of demand, transforming ETH from a speculative asset into a yield-bearing, utility-based infrastructure asset. In conclusion, the current market downturn represents not a collapse in value but a "migration of the pricing anchor" towards Ethereum's core structural value as the world's premier security settlement layer.

marsbit37 min fa

Ethereum Repricing: From Rollup-Centric to the 'Security Settlement Layer'

marsbit37 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片