Bitcoin: Here’s how the tides have changed for BTC despite sharks’ input

AmbcryptoPubblicato 2023-01-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-01-20

Introduzione

Stablecoin inflow has been met with a decrease in Bitcoin reserves. Whales behavior could help BTC regain bullishness provided the UTXO value bands maintain status quo.

The euphoria around Bitcoin [BTC] might have come to an abrupt end after the king coin failed to register significant gains for the first time in the new year.

""

At press time, BTC was back at the $20,000 region despite calls to breakout farther. However, the price trend is not the only part that has changed in the Bitcoin system.

""

The flow has now backtracked

""

When the market was in its boom era, there was a massive flow of stablecoins in exchanges. This action depicted investors’ resolve to grab a share of the accumulation and profit taking.

""

According to CryptoQuant analyst Joaowedson, there was a recent inflow of $250 million into the Binance USD [BUSD]. As this generated a lot of buzzes, it also impacted the BTC price uptick.

""

However, the inrush into the spot market meant that there was a decrease in the reserves. So, while there was increased buying pressure in pushing the price, the dip in reserve was also influential in driving down the demand.

""

Besides that, Joaowedson confirmed that the BUSD stablecoin flow tides have changed for the past few days as indicated by the data on CryptoQuant. This decrease means that only a few number of investors were participating in Bitcoin transactions.

Source: CryptoQuant

""

Concerning the social volume, data from Santiment showed that the metric was relatively at a low point compared to the previous peaks it had hit in the last 18 days. At the time of writing, the social volume was 2774.

""

The social volume displays how trendy an arbitrary search for an asset is. Since the volume had decreased, it implied that traders had filtered Bitcoin out of the top crypto searches.

""

Additionally, the positive sentiment accompanied the direction of the social volume with a glaring fall off. This means that investor perception of the coin was no keener.

Source: Santiment

""

Will whales help with the BTC cause?

""

In another CryptoQuant publication, AxelAdler Jr admitted that there were still signs that the market could remain bullish. In defense of his stance, the analyst referred to how Bitcoin whales have massively accumulated the coin.

""

According to AxelAdler Jr, the Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) value bands within the 1,000 to 10,000 range began scooping on 11 January. Those with 100 to 1000 also joined the party on 16 January.

""

Since this indicator displays the behavior of whales, the switch to the green zone shows evident whale presence in the market. Hence, a continual accumulation could influence the market broadly.

Source: CryptoQuant

Letture associate

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1 h fa

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片