5个原因分析:为什么现在可能是加密货币的底部?

PanewsPubblicato 2022-12-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-12-13

Introduzione

早些时候 Bankless 联合创始人David Hoffman 与 Chris 进行了 50 分钟的交谈,Chris 阐述了他 bottom-call 的论点。

早些时候 Bankless 联合创始人David Hoffman 与 Chris 进行了 50 分钟的交谈,Chris 阐述了他 bottom-call 的论点。在这篇文章中,我们将深入探讨 Burniske 认为市场已经触底的核心原因。

2022 年是残酷的一年,Terra、3AC 和 FTX 等前巨头的崩溃对该行业造成了巨大破坏。

人们的情绪低落,价格下跌也非常厉害。加密货币总市值比其峰值下降了71%以上,在短短一年多的时间里蒸发了超过 2.2 万亿美元的价值。

但最糟糕的情况可能已经过去了吗?

Chris Burniske 是这么认为的。作为风险投资公司 Placeholder 的合伙人,Chris 是一位真正的加密货币 OG,经历了多次周期。他写了最早的加密货币投资书籍之一,也是第一位涵盖加密货币的买方分析师。

他还预测了这个熊市,曾经预计牛市 2021 年 11 月见顶,并敦促在 7 月至 8 月的反弹中保持谨慎。

现在,当许多人质疑加密货币的未来时…… Chris 却转为看涨,还认为我们可能已经触底了。

早些时候 David Hoffman ( Bankless 联合创始人)与 Chris 进行了 50 分钟的交谈,Chris 阐述了他 bottom-call 的论点。

在这篇文章中,我们将深入探讨 Burniske 认为市场已经触底的核心原因。

1. 没有强迫性卖家

Chris Burniske 认为我们已经触底的一个关键原因是,已经没有大型的强迫性卖家了。

许多人认为,继 Terra 崩溃之后,FTX 的崩溃将启动继今年5月至7月 Terra 崩溃之后的第二次信贷危机,大规模的蔓延事件。

然而,Chris 认为,FTX 的崩溃并没有创造新一轮的强制抛售浪潮,相反,这可能是“压轴戏”,自 UST 崩溃以来,我们再次看到的大规模平仓和去杠杆化。

谁可能是下一个大型强制卖家?现在很难说。今年夏天的时候比较容易判断,那时更容易确定可能破产的企业。

相对于 Terra 和 3AC 的崩溃,整个行业也更有能力经受住 FTX 风暴,因为现在整个加密货币(以及 TradFi)的信贷现在比这些事件发生时要稳固得多。

虽然我们可能会看到一些破产,但这不会增加市场近期的抛售压力,因为破产公司持有的资产将在更晚的时候被拍卖。

Chris 承认基金赎回存在月末抛售风险,但他认为这对市场的影响可能会降低,因为大多数被兑换的基金可能已经被破坏。

2. BTC 处于深度价值区域

克里斯认为我们已经触底的另一个原因是,各种链上、技术和定量指标表明比特币处于深度价值区域。(深度价值是一种量化投资策略,它根据股票的估值倍数,在众多股票中选择最便宜的股票进行投资。)

BTC MVRV - 来源:Glassnode

Chris 指出的一个指标是市场价值与实现价值 (MVRV) 比率,根据 WooMetrics,“通过对区块链上最后一次移动时的币的市场价值进行加总,近似于为所有现有币支付的价值。”

Chris 认为,当 MVRV 跌破 1 美元时,BTC 处于价值区间,因为这表明大多数投资者处于水下,因此不太可能平仓。

BTC 每日活跃地址——来源:Glassnode

另一个链上指标是每日活跃地址,该地址在 11 月 9 日飙升至 107 万,也就是当下的 local bottom。这是自今年夏天崩盘以来的最高单日总数。Chris 认为,地址的增加表明新买家正在进入市场。

我们还能如何衡量比特币是否触底?一个指标是 200 周简单移动平均线 (SMA),它一直代表着 BTC 的底部。

BTC 资金利率 - 来源:Coinglass

最后,Chris 着眼于永续期货的资金利率来评估交易者的仓位。他特别指出,他正在寻找一个持续的负融资期,或者当空头头寸向多头头寸付款时(多头头寸预计资产价格会上涨,而空头头寸预计资产价格会下跌)。虽然不同的交易所会有很大的不同,但在 Binance 上,年化 BTC 资金是-9.8%。

一个潜在的风险是比特币矿工投降式抛售,(投降式抛售指当多头完全放弃价格上涨的希望时,在熊市的谷底突然爆发的最后一波抛售浪潮。)但他认为,虽然该行业有着制度化,但可能不会像之前的周期那样具有影响力。

3. ETH 的基本面很强

以太坊强劲的基本面也表明,底部可能已经到来。

Chris 认为合并对 ETH 市场结构和流量的影响开始显现。

为了支持这一说法,他指出,ETH 在 11 月 9 日 FTX 抛售深度期间的底部高于 Celsius 和 3AC 爆发期间的底部。Chris 将此归因于合并,正如我们所知,合并消除了矿工的抛售压力并将 ETH 推向了 ultra-sound 障碍,因为它有净通货紧缩发行。

合并后的 ETH 发行——来源:Ultrasound.money

Chris 还着眼于应用层来评估以太坊的基本面。他特别指出,在整场危机中,以太坊上的 DeFi 从未间断。

主要的 DeFi 协议运行无误,主要借贷市场保持完全偿付能力并执行清算,而 DEX 已经促进了数十亿的交易量。Chris 认为,密切关注该领域的资本分配者已经意识到并理解这一点。

ETH 200W SMA - 来源:TradingView

ETH 的技术指标表明,它处于价值区域,因为它的交易价格低于其 200 周移动平均线。然而,为了维持涨势,ETH 需要重返这一水平。

4. 宏观形势的改善

最后一个原因是宏观环境的改善。

尽管担心经济增长,但 Chris 认为不断变化的宏观背景是有利于触底的。

随着美联储加息,风险资产在 2022 年受到重创。无风险利率的急剧上升导致了股市的多重压缩,因为现在有了真正的资本成本,投资者不再愿意接受令人窒息的估值了。

结果就是,高增长的科技公司,尤其是纳斯达克的科技公司(加密货币与其表现出很强的相关性)经历了与 1990 年代末互联网泡沫规模相似的残酷下跌。

然而,一个关键区别是,许多公司的基本面都很强劲,Meta 等企业继续成为提供自由现金流的强力“机器”,在其垂直领域上拥有强大的控制力。

通货膨胀是搅动紧缩政策的一根稻草,也显示出要翻身的迹象,最近的 CPI 和 PPI 数据都很疲软。

正如 Chris 所说,市场关心“边际变化率”或“放缓不好的事情”的概念,这表明未来情况会有所改善。

5. 这些因素是一致的

随着 LUNA 之后的去杠杆化即将结束,BTC 和 ETH 的链上、技术和量化指标看涨,以及宏观背景不断改善,正在向加密货币触底做瞄准。

Chris 预计 2023 年将出现与上次熊市类似的剧烈波动。我们可能会遇到假性反弹,然后是下跌。

然而,上述因素的汇合足以让他相信,最坏的情况(至少在价格方面)很可能已经过去了。

Letture associate

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit14 min fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit14 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit27 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit27 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片